Topical amitriptyline in burning mouth syndrome: A retrospective real-world evidence study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/head.14818
Ashley Lebel, Dylan Da Silva Vieira, Yves Boucher
{"title":"Topical amitriptyline in burning mouth syndrome: A retrospective real-world evidence study.","authors":"Ashley Lebel, Dylan Da Silva Vieira, Yves Boucher","doi":"10.1111/head.14818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of topical amitriptyline as a potential route of administration for the management of burning mouth syndrome.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Burning mouth syndrome is a complex, idiopathic, and debilitating orofacial pain disorder that impairs quality of life, with a prevalence of up to 18% in menopausal women. Available drugs to alleviate its burning sensation have inconsistent and limited efficacy. Given its physicochemical properties, excellent tolerability, and ability to target peripheral pathways, topical amitriptyline seems a promising mechanistically specific analgesic drug for burning mouth syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cross-sectional real-world evidence study, patients with burning mouth syndrome who were prescribed topical amitriptyline for 8 weeks were identified. Eligibility criteria stemmed from ICHD-3, ICOP, and consensus definitions. The primary outcome measure was mean daily pain intensity (on a 0-10 scale); secondary outcomes included adverse events and patient global impression of improvement. Data are given as the mean ± SD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included and analyzed. Mean daily pain was 6.7 ± 2.1 at baseline and 3.7 ± 2.3 after treatment, with a mean reduction of 3.1 ± 2.8 (p = 0.002). Half of the patients experienced a decrease in pain by at least 50% (p = 0.008). Several mild adverse events were reported, such as somnolence or dry mouth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical amitriptyline may be a safe and potent route of administration in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome, a hypothesis to be tested in further controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1167-1173"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of topical amitriptyline as a potential route of administration for the management of burning mouth syndrome.

Background: Burning mouth syndrome is a complex, idiopathic, and debilitating orofacial pain disorder that impairs quality of life, with a prevalence of up to 18% in menopausal women. Available drugs to alleviate its burning sensation have inconsistent and limited efficacy. Given its physicochemical properties, excellent tolerability, and ability to target peripheral pathways, topical amitriptyline seems a promising mechanistically specific analgesic drug for burning mouth syndrome.

Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional real-world evidence study, patients with burning mouth syndrome who were prescribed topical amitriptyline for 8 weeks were identified. Eligibility criteria stemmed from ICHD-3, ICOP, and consensus definitions. The primary outcome measure was mean daily pain intensity (on a 0-10 scale); secondary outcomes included adverse events and patient global impression of improvement. Data are given as the mean ± SD.

Results: A total of 15 patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included and analyzed. Mean daily pain was 6.7 ± 2.1 at baseline and 3.7 ± 2.3 after treatment, with a mean reduction of 3.1 ± 2.8 (p = 0.002). Half of the patients experienced a decrease in pain by at least 50% (p = 0.008). Several mild adverse events were reported, such as somnolence or dry mouth.

Conclusions: Topical amitriptyline may be a safe and potent route of administration in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome, a hypothesis to be tested in further controlled trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外用阿米替林治疗灼口综合征:一项真实世界证据的回顾性研究。
摘要评估外用阿米替林作为治疗口腔烧灼综合征的潜在给药途径的有效性、耐受性和安全性:背景:灼热口腔综合征是一种复杂、特发性、使人衰弱的口面部疼痛疾病,会影响生活质量,在更年期妇女中的发病率高达 18%。现有的缓解烧灼感的药物疗效不稳定且有限。鉴于阿米替林的理化特性、良好的耐受性以及靶向外周通路的能力,外用阿米替林似乎是一种很有前景的治疗烧灼感口腔综合征的机理特异性镇痛药物:在这项回顾性横断面真实世界证据研究中,确定了接受 8 周局部阿米替林治疗的口腔烧灼综合征患者。资格标准源自 ICHD-3、ICOP 和共识定义。主要结果指标为平均每日疼痛强度(0-10 级);次要结果指标包括不良事件和患者对病情改善的总体印象。数据以平均值 ± SD 表示:共纳入并分析了 15 名符合资格标准的患者。基线时平均每日疼痛为 6.7 ± 2.1,治疗后为 3.7 ± 2.3,平均减轻 3.1 ± 2.8(p = 0.002)。半数患者的疼痛至少减轻了 50%(p = 0.008)。此外,还报告了一些轻微的不良反应,如嗜睡或口干:外用阿米替林可能是治疗口腔灼烧综合征的一种安全有效的给药途径,这一假设有待进一步的对照试验来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Anxiety, depression, and headache-related disability in a large pediatric clinic-based sample. Associations of comorbid headache disorders and depression with leisure-time physical activity among 14,088 adults in The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review. Comparative bioavailability of single-dose zavegepant during and between migraine attacks: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1