Òscar Miró, Enrique Martín Mojarro, Gabrielle Huré, Pere Llorens, Víctor Gil, Aitor Alquézar-Arbé, Carlos Bibiano, Nayra Cabrera González, Marta Massó, Ivo Strebel, Begoña Espinosa, Silvia Mínguez Masó, Desiree Wussler, Samyut Shrestha, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Javier Jacob, Javier Millán, Juan Antonio Andueza, Héctor Alonso, Silvia Larrondo Pàmies, Jaume Farré Cerdà, Celia Planco Martínez, Pablo Herrero, W Frank Peacock, Christian Mueller
{"title":"Digoxin initiation after an acute heart failure episode and its association with post-discharge outcomes: an international multicenter analysis.","authors":"Òscar Miró, Enrique Martín Mojarro, Gabrielle Huré, Pere Llorens, Víctor Gil, Aitor Alquézar-Arbé, Carlos Bibiano, Nayra Cabrera González, Marta Massó, Ivo Strebel, Begoña Espinosa, Silvia Mínguez Masó, Desiree Wussler, Samyut Shrestha, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Javier Jacob, Javier Millán, Juan Antonio Andueza, Héctor Alonso, Silvia Larrondo Pàmies, Jaume Farré Cerdà, Celia Planco Martínez, Pablo Herrero, W Frank Peacock, Christian Mueller","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03744-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digoxin is commonly used to treat acute heart failure (AHF), especially in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). Nonetheless, there is little consensus about in which patients digoxin should be given, the proper time for digoxin initiation, and whether digoxin initiation is associated with improved outcomes. We investigated factors related to digoxin initiation after an episode of AHF and whether patients receiving digoxin presented better short-term outcomes. We analyzed digoxin-naïve AHF patients from a Spanish and Swiss database, who were dichotomized into cohorts based on their receipt of digoxin treatment at discharge. The relationship between digoxin initiation and 23 additional patient covariates, including chronic treatment, was investigated, as well as its association with 90-day combined adverse events (defined as all-cause death or AHF hospitalization). Of 13,105 patients (10,600/2505 from the Spanish/Swiss cohorts, respectively), the median (interquartile range) age was 83 (74.87) years, and 51% were women. Of these, 484 (3.7%) received digoxin at discharge, which was associated with AF, female sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and coming from the Spanish cohort. Parameters inversely associated with receiving digoxin at discharge included some chronic treatments, diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Digoxin initiation was not association with 90-day adverse events, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.939 (0.769-1.146), but there was an interaction for CKD, aHR = 1.390 (0.831-2.325) vs. 0.854 (0.682-1.183), p = 0.039, and for cohort pertinence, with higher risk in the Swiss cohort; aHR = 1.405 (0.827-2.386) vs. 0.862 (0.689-1.077), p = 0.046. Digoxin initiation after an AHF episode was more frequent in the Spanish cohort and was associated with certain patient characteristics (AF, female sex, reduced LVEF, no DM, no CKD), but had no effect on 90-day outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"65-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03744-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digoxin is commonly used to treat acute heart failure (AHF), especially in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). Nonetheless, there is little consensus about in which patients digoxin should be given, the proper time for digoxin initiation, and whether digoxin initiation is associated with improved outcomes. We investigated factors related to digoxin initiation after an episode of AHF and whether patients receiving digoxin presented better short-term outcomes. We analyzed digoxin-naïve AHF patients from a Spanish and Swiss database, who were dichotomized into cohorts based on their receipt of digoxin treatment at discharge. The relationship between digoxin initiation and 23 additional patient covariates, including chronic treatment, was investigated, as well as its association with 90-day combined adverse events (defined as all-cause death or AHF hospitalization). Of 13,105 patients (10,600/2505 from the Spanish/Swiss cohorts, respectively), the median (interquartile range) age was 83 (74.87) years, and 51% were women. Of these, 484 (3.7%) received digoxin at discharge, which was associated with AF, female sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and coming from the Spanish cohort. Parameters inversely associated with receiving digoxin at discharge included some chronic treatments, diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Digoxin initiation was not association with 90-day adverse events, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.939 (0.769-1.146), but there was an interaction for CKD, aHR = 1.390 (0.831-2.325) vs. 0.854 (0.682-1.183), p = 0.039, and for cohort pertinence, with higher risk in the Swiss cohort; aHR = 1.405 (0.827-2.386) vs. 0.862 (0.689-1.077), p = 0.046. Digoxin initiation after an AHF episode was more frequent in the Spanish cohort and was associated with certain patient characteristics (AF, female sex, reduced LVEF, no DM, no CKD), but had no effect on 90-day outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.