3-Year Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Valves

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Cardiovascular interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.06.001
{"title":"3-Year Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Valves","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A prior Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry–based analysis reported similar 1-year clinical outcomes with small (20-mm) vs large (≥23-mm) balloon-expandable valves (BEV).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to describe mid-term 3-year clinical outcomes for small vs large BEV and the relationship between discharge echocardiographic mean gradient (MG) and different definitions of prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) with clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the TVT Registry with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services linkage, a propensity-matched analysis of patients receiving 20- vs ≥23-mm BEVs was performed. Spline curves and Kaplan-Meier plots with adjusted HRs determined the relationship between MG and 3-year mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 316,091 patients were analyzed; after propensity matching, 8,100 pairs of each group were compared. The 20-mm BEV was associated with higher MGs compared with ≥23-mm BEVs (16.2 ± 7.2 mm Hg vs 11.8 ± 5.7 mm Hg; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). At 3 years, there was no difference in mortality between 20- and ≥23-mm BEVs (31.5% vs 32.5%, respectively; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.90-1.05). Compared with an MG of 10 to 30 mm Hg, an MG &lt;10 mm Hg (HR: 1.25; 95% CI:1.22-1.27) was associated with increased 3-year mortality. Measured severe PPM and predicted no PPM were associated with increased 3-year mortality (33.5% vs 32.9% vs 32.1%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and (33.5% vs 31.1% vs 30%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), respectively. Low MG and severe measured PPM were associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with small-prosthesis BEVs (20 mm) had identical 3-year survival as those with larger (≥23-mm) BEV valves. Severe measured PPM and low MG (&lt;10 mm Hg), but not predicted severe PPM, were associated with lower LVEF and increased mortality, suggesting that LVEF is the culprit for worse outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879824008574/pdfft?md5=208ccfa7d91dfbfede1b2c638328c8f0&pid=1-s2.0-S1936879824008574-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879824008574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A prior Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry–based analysis reported similar 1-year clinical outcomes with small (20-mm) vs large (≥23-mm) balloon-expandable valves (BEV).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to describe mid-term 3-year clinical outcomes for small vs large BEV and the relationship between discharge echocardiographic mean gradient (MG) and different definitions of prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) with clinical outcomes.

Methods

Using the TVT Registry with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services linkage, a propensity-matched analysis of patients receiving 20- vs ≥23-mm BEVs was performed. Spline curves and Kaplan-Meier plots with adjusted HRs determined the relationship between MG and 3-year mortality.

Results

In total, 316,091 patients were analyzed; after propensity matching, 8,100 pairs of each group were compared. The 20-mm BEV was associated with higher MGs compared with ≥23-mm BEVs (16.2 ± 7.2 mm Hg vs 11.8 ± 5.7 mm Hg; P < 0.0001). At 3 years, there was no difference in mortality between 20- and ≥23-mm BEVs (31.5% vs 32.5%, respectively; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.90-1.05). Compared with an MG of 10 to 30 mm Hg, an MG <10 mm Hg (HR: 1.25; 95% CI:1.22-1.27) was associated with increased 3-year mortality. Measured severe PPM and predicted no PPM were associated with increased 3-year mortality (33.5% vs 32.9% vs 32.1%; P < 0.0001) and (33.5% vs 31.1% vs 30%; P < 0.0001), respectively. Low MG and severe measured PPM were associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Conclusions

Patients with small-prosthesis BEVs (20 mm) had identical 3-year survival as those with larger (≥23-mm) BEV valves. Severe measured PPM and low MG (<10 mm Hg), but not predicted severe PPM, were associated with lower LVEF and increased mortality, suggesting that LVEF is the culprit for worse outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
球囊扩张瓣膜的 3 年疗效:20 毫米与更大的瓣膜(≥23 毫米)。
背景:之前胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会 TVT(经导管瓣膜治疗)注册中心的一项分析报告显示,小型(20 毫米)与大型(≥23 毫米)球囊扩张瓣膜(BEV)的 1 年临床疗效相似:本研究旨在描述小瓣膜与大瓣膜的 3 年中期临床疗效,以及出院超声心动图平均梯度(MG)和假体与患者不匹配(PPM)的不同定义与临床疗效之间的关系:利用与美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)链接的 TVT 注册表,对接受 20 毫米与≥23 毫米 BEV 的患者进行倾向匹配分析。结果显示,MG与3年死亡率之间的关系是通过Spline曲线和Kaplan-Meier图以及调整后的HRs确定的:共分析了 316,091 例患者;经过倾向匹配后,每组有 8,100 对患者进行了比较。与≥23毫米的BEV相比,20毫米的BEV与较高的MG有关(16.2 ± 7.2毫米汞柱 vs 11.8 ± 5.7毫米汞柱;P < 0.0001)。3 年后,20 mm 和 ≥23 mm BEV 之间的死亡率没有差异(分别为 31.5% vs 32.5%;HR:0.97;95% CI:0.90-1.05)。与 10 至 30 mm Hg 的 MG 相比,MG 更低:小人工瓣膜(20 毫米)患者与大人工瓣膜(≥23 毫米)患者的 3 年生存率相同。测量到的严重 PPM 和低 MG (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.80%
发文量
756
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A Novel Technique for the Common Femoral Artery and its Bifurcation Impact of Severity and Extent of Iliofemoral Atherosclerosis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing TAVR The Hostile Score Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1