Outcomes following antegrade-only versus retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the CCTOP registry.

Abstract

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be performed using an antegrade-only (AO) approach or a retrograde approach (RA). Whether an RA carries a higher risk of complications needs further investigation.

Methods: The Canadian CTO PCI (CCTOP) was a multicenter, prospective, investigator-initiated cohort study conducted at 6 experienced centers across Canada between March 2014 and October 2019. Patients who underwent an RA were compared to AO patients. The primary endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, any post-PCI cardiac enzyme elevation, urgent revascularization, and tamponade. A multivariable analysis was performed to control for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 1033 patients were included in the study, and an RA was used in 48.4% of the cases. The RA was associated with higher lesions complexity (J-CTO score 2.7 ± 1.1 vs 2.3 ± 1.1, P < .001) and lower technical success (81.2% vs 91.5%, P < .001). The risk of in-hospital MACE was higher with the RA (10.2% vs 4.7%, P < .001), and all deaths occurred in the RA group (0.8% vs 0%, P = .038). In the multivariable model, the RA remained associated with an increased risk of MACE (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.26 to 4.02).

Conclusions: Our experience confirms that the RA is associated with an independent increased risk of in-hospital MACE when compared with an AO approach.