Routine Hearing Screening for Older Adults in Primary Care: Insights of Patients and Clinic Personnel.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae107
Mina Silberberg, Anisha Singh, Janet Prvu Bettger, Sherri L Smith, Howard W Francis, Judy R Dubno, Kristine A Schulz, Rowena J Dolor, Amy R Walker, Debara L Tucci
{"title":"Routine Hearing Screening for Older Adults in Primary Care: Insights of Patients and Clinic Personnel.","authors":"Mina Silberberg, Anisha Singh, Janet Prvu Bettger, Sherri L Smith, Howard W Francis, Judy R Dubno, Kristine A Schulz, Rowena J Dolor, Amy R Walker, Debara L Tucci","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Hearing loss frequently goes undiagnosed and untreated, with serious sequelae. Hearing screening facilitates diagnosis and treatment but is not routinely conducted in primary care. This study addresses the attitudes and insights of patients and primary care clinic personnel relative to the routinization of hearing screening in primary care for older adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data presented are from the qualitative portion of a larger study. The main study compared screening completion for 3 approaches to coordinating telephone-based hearing screening with primary care-1 offering hearing screening within the primary care encounter and 2 providing information for at-home screening ( 1 with and 1 without provider encouragement). Focus groups/interviews were conducted with personnel (n = 38) at the 6 participating clinics, patients who completed screening and were referred for diagnosis (n = 14), and patients who did not complete screening (n = 10). Analysis used the general inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients had unaddressed hearing concerns prior to the study. Negative attitudes toward hearing loss/treatment were common, and experiences of family and friends influenced attitudes, but lack of urgency was the primary barrier to screening completion. Respondents favored routine primary care-based hearing screening for older adults, but clinic personnel noted challenges of time, space, workflow, and reimbursement.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings favor greater routinization of hearing screening in primary care. Routinization will be enhanced by improved reimbursement for screening and follow-up; specialist engagement with primary care and the public (including leveraging older adults' social networks); and further research on specific integration options.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hearing loss frequently goes undiagnosed and untreated, with serious sequelae. Hearing screening facilitates diagnosis and treatment but is not routinely conducted in primary care. This study addresses the attitudes and insights of patients and primary care clinic personnel relative to the routinization of hearing screening in primary care for older adults.

Research design and methods: Data presented are from the qualitative portion of a larger study. The main study compared screening completion for 3 approaches to coordinating telephone-based hearing screening with primary care-1 offering hearing screening within the primary care encounter and 2 providing information for at-home screening ( 1 with and 1 without provider encouragement). Focus groups/interviews were conducted with personnel (n = 38) at the 6 participating clinics, patients who completed screening and were referred for diagnosis (n = 14), and patients who did not complete screening (n = 10). Analysis used the general inductive approach.

Results: Most patients had unaddressed hearing concerns prior to the study. Negative attitudes toward hearing loss/treatment were common, and experiences of family and friends influenced attitudes, but lack of urgency was the primary barrier to screening completion. Respondents favored routine primary care-based hearing screening for older adults, but clinic personnel noted challenges of time, space, workflow, and reimbursement.

Discussion and implications: Findings favor greater routinization of hearing screening in primary care. Routinization will be enhanced by improved reimbursement for screening and follow-up; specialist engagement with primary care and the public (including leveraging older adults' social networks); and further research on specific integration options.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层医疗机构对老年人的常规听力筛查:患者和诊所工作人员的见解。
背景和目的:听力损失常常得不到诊断和治疗,并带来严重的后遗症。听力筛查有助于诊断和治疗,但并未在初级保健中常规开展。本研究探讨了患者和初级保健诊所工作人员对于在初级保健中对老年人进行常规听力筛查的态度和见解:所提供的数据来自一项大型研究的定性部分。主要研究比较了三种协调电话听力筛查与初级保健的筛查完成情况,一种是在初级保健中提供听力筛查,另两种是提供在家筛查的信息(一种有提供者鼓励,另一种没有提供者鼓励)。对六家参与诊所的工作人员(38 人)、完成筛查并转诊的患者(14 人)和未完成筛查的患者(10 人)进行了焦点小组/访谈。分析采用一般归纳法:结果:大多数患者在参加研究前都有听力问题未得到解决。受访者普遍对听力损失/治疗持消极态度,家人和朋友的经历也影响了他们的态度,但缺乏紧迫感是完成筛查的主要障碍。受访者赞成对老年人进行常规的初级保健听力筛查,但诊所人员指出时间、空间、工作流程和报销方面存在挑战:讨论与启示:研究结果支持在初级保健中进一步将听力筛查常规化。通过改善筛查和随访的报销、专家与初级保健和公众的接触(包括利用老年人的社交网络)以及对具体整合方案的进一步研究,将促进常规化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and healthcare utilization among aging veterans in supported housing: A comparison with independently housed age-matched veterans. Communications needs of family caregivers of geriatric unit residents at end-of-life. Taking Action to Support Nursing Home Resident Wellbeing: Perspectives of U.S. Nursing Home Staff During COVID-19. Supporting older people experiencing homelessness and memory problems in hostels: Learning from an ethnographic study. Focusing on Caregiver Neglect: A Novel Strategy for Mistreatment of Older Adults Screening and Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1