Dynamics of spontaneous thoughts: Exploration, attentional profile and the segmentation of the stream of thoughts

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103735
Adrien Kérébel , Jacques-Antoine Caille , Jérôme Sackur
{"title":"Dynamics of spontaneous thoughts: Exploration, attentional profile and the segmentation of the stream of thoughts","authors":"Adrien Kérébel ,&nbsp;Jacques-Antoine Caille ,&nbsp;Jérôme Sackur","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For a long time, clinical knowledge and first-person reports have pointed to individual differences in the dynamics of spontaneous thoughts, in particular in the extreme case of psychiatric conditions (e.g. racing thoughts in Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD; rumination in depression). We used a novel procedure to investigate this individual variability by combining verbal fluency tasks and introspective reports of thought content. Our goal was twofold. First, we tested the hypothesis that a greater segmentation of the stream of thoughts would be associated with trait inattention, in line with subjective reports of ADHD patients. Second, we tested whether the segmentation of the stream of thoughts increased with an increased tendency for exploratory behavior, following recent theoretical claims on the mechanisms underpinning the generation of spontaneous thoughts. Our results support both hypotheses, shedding light on the factors contributing to the individual variability in the dynamics of the stream of thought.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 103735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024001028/pdfft?md5=8844461dfebfbe6dd6864b069f621d0d&pid=1-s2.0-S1053810024001028-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024001028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a long time, clinical knowledge and first-person reports have pointed to individual differences in the dynamics of spontaneous thoughts, in particular in the extreme case of psychiatric conditions (e.g. racing thoughts in Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD; rumination in depression). We used a novel procedure to investigate this individual variability by combining verbal fluency tasks and introspective reports of thought content. Our goal was twofold. First, we tested the hypothesis that a greater segmentation of the stream of thoughts would be associated with trait inattention, in line with subjective reports of ADHD patients. Second, we tested whether the segmentation of the stream of thoughts increased with an increased tendency for exploratory behavior, following recent theoretical claims on the mechanisms underpinning the generation of spontaneous thoughts. Our results support both hypotheses, shedding light on the factors contributing to the individual variability in the dynamics of the stream of thought.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自发思维的动力:探索、注意力状况和思维流的分割。
长期以来,临床知识和第一手报告都表明,自发思维的动态存在个体差异,尤其是在精神疾病的极端情况下(例如,注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)中的思维奔逸;抑郁症中的反刍)。我们采用了一种新颖的程序,通过将语言流畅性任务与思想内容的内省报告相结合来研究这种个体差异性。我们的目标有两个。首先,我们根据多动症患者的主观报告,检验了思维流的更大分割与特质性注意力不集中相关的假设。其次,根据最近关于自发思维产生机制的理论主张,我们测试了思维流的细分程度是否会随着探索行为倾向的增加而增加。我们的研究结果支持这两个假设,揭示了导致思维流动态个体差异的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
期刊最新文献
The vividness of visualisations and autistic trait expression are not strongly associated Audiomotor temporal recalibration modulates feeling of control: Exploration through an online experiment and Bayesian modeling Optimising episodic encoding within segmented virtual contexts Opening the black box: Think Aloud as a method to study the spontaneous stream of consciousness Immersive exposure to simulated visual hallucinations modulates high-level human cognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1