Limitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series.

Stephen C Rush, Michael J Lauria, Erik Scott DeSoucy, Eric J Koch, Jonathan J Kamler, Michael A Remley, Nate Always, Fredrick Brodie, Andrew Foudrait, Paul Barendregt, Michael Atkins, Keary Miller, Richard Hines, Matthew Champagne, Lorenzo Paladino, Stacy A Shackelford, Ethan A Miles, Joseph Obiajulu, Warren C Dorlac, Jennifer M Gurney, Douglas Robb, Ricky C Kue
{"title":"Limitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series.","authors":"Stephen C Rush, Michael J Lauria, Erik Scott DeSoucy, Eric J Koch, Jonathan J Kamler, Michael A Remley, Nate Always, Fredrick Brodie, Andrew Foudrait, Paul Barendregt, Michael Atkins, Keary Miller, Richard Hines, Matthew Champagne, Lorenzo Paladino, Stacy A Shackelford, Ethan A Miles, Joseph Obiajulu, Warren C Dorlac, Jennifer M Gurney, Douglas Robb, Ricky C Kue","doi":"10.55460/0GO5-QW03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mass casualty events (MASCALs) in the combat environment, which involve large numbers of casualties that overwhelm immediately available resources, are fundamentally chaotic and dynamic and inherently dangerous. Formal triage systems use diagnostic algorithms, colored markers, and four or more named categories. We hypothesized that formal triage systems are inadequately trained and practiced and too complex to successfully implement in true MASCAL events. This retrospective analysis evaluates the real-world application of triage systems in prehospital military MASCALs and other aspects of MASCAL management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed Special Operations Forces (SOF) medics known to us who have participated in military prehospital MASCALs and analyzed them. Aggregated data describing the scope of the incidents, the use of formal triage algorithms and colored markers, the number of categories, and the interventions on scene were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and lessons learned were consolidated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1996 to 2022 we identified 29 MASCALs that were managed by military medics in the prehospital setting. There was a median of three providers (range 1-85) and 15 casualties (range 6-519) per event. Four or more formal triage categories were used in only one event. Colored markers and formal algorithms were not used. Life-saving interventions were performed in 27 of 29 (93%) missions and blood transfusions were performed in four (17%) MASCALs. The top lessons learned were: 1) security and accountability are cornerstones of MASCAL management; 2) casualty movement is a priority; 3) intuitive triage categories are the default; 4)life-saving interventions are performed as time and tacticspermit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Formal triage systems requiring the use ofdiagnostic algorithms, colored tags, and four or five categories are seldom implemented in real-world military prehospitalMASCAL management. The training of field triage should besimplified and pragmatic, as exemplified by these instances.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/0GO5-QW03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mass casualty events (MASCALs) in the combat environment, which involve large numbers of casualties that overwhelm immediately available resources, are fundamentally chaotic and dynamic and inherently dangerous. Formal triage systems use diagnostic algorithms, colored markers, and four or more named categories. We hypothesized that formal triage systems are inadequately trained and practiced and too complex to successfully implement in true MASCAL events. This retrospective analysis evaluates the real-world application of triage systems in prehospital military MASCALs and other aspects of MASCAL management.

Methods: We surveyed Special Operations Forces (SOF) medics known to us who have participated in military prehospital MASCALs and analyzed them. Aggregated data describing the scope of the incidents, the use of formal triage algorithms and colored markers, the number of categories, and the interventions on scene were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and lessons learned were consolidated.

Results: From 1996 to 2022 we identified 29 MASCALs that were managed by military medics in the prehospital setting. There was a median of three providers (range 1-85) and 15 casualties (range 6-519) per event. Four or more formal triage categories were used in only one event. Colored markers and formal algorithms were not used. Life-saving interventions were performed in 27 of 29 (93%) missions and blood transfusions were performed in four (17%) MASCALs. The top lessons learned were: 1) security and accountability are cornerstones of MASCAL management; 2) casualty movement is a priority; 3) intuitive triage categories are the default; 4)life-saving interventions are performed as time and tacticspermit.

Conclusion: Formal triage systems requiring the use ofdiagnostic algorithms, colored tags, and four or five categories are seldom implemented in real-world military prehospitalMASCAL management. The training of field triage should besimplified and pragmatic, as exemplified by these instances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军队大规模伤亡响应中分流的局限性:病例系列。
导言:作战环境中的大规模伤亡事件(MASCALs)涉及大量人员伤亡,使即时可用的资源不堪重负。正式分流系统使用诊断算法、彩色标记和四个或更多命名类别。我们假设,正规的分流系统没有经过充分的培训和实践,而且过于复杂,无法在真正的 MASCAL 事件中成功实施。这项回顾性分析评估了分诊系统在院前军事MASCAL中的实际应用情况以及MASCAL管理的其他方面:我们调查了我们所知道的参加过军事院前 MASCAL 的特种作战部队 (SOF) 医护人员,并对他们进行了分析。我们使用描述性统计对事件范围、正式分诊算法和彩色标记的使用、类别数量以及现场干预措施等综合数据进行了分析,并总结了经验教训:从 1996 年到 2022 年,我们共发现了 29 起由军事医疗人员在院前环境中处理的 MASCAL 事件。每次事件的中位数为 3 名医护人员(范围为 1-85)和 15 名伤员(范围为 6-519)。仅在一次事件中使用了四个或四个以上的正式分流类别。未使用彩色标记和正式算法。在 29 次任务中有 27 次(93%)实施了救生干预,在 4 次(17%)MASCAL 中实施了输血。最重要的经验教训是1) 安全和问责制是 MASCAL 管理的基石;2) 伤员转移是优先事项;3) 默认采用直观的分流类别;4) 在时间和战术允许的情况下实施救生干预:结论:在实际的军事院前 MASCAL 管理中,很少使用要求使用诊断算法、彩色标签和四五个类别的正式分流系统。现场分诊培训应简化、务实,这些实例就是很好的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Limitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series. REBOA Use in a Medicalized Prehospital Setting Proposal for a First Protocol Based on the Delphi Method. Military Medical Student Specialty Preferences During the DHA Transition: A Retrospective Analysis. The Effect of Radiological Assessment of Volunteers for French Paratrooper Training A Five-Year Retrospective Study. Vascular Repair in Wartime Casualties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1