Comparison of Biological Augmentation in Rotator Cuff Repair Using Inflamed Versus Noninflamed Bursal Tissue in Rats

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.036
Anja Z. Zhang M.D., Andreas Ficklscherer M.D., Thomas R. Niethammer M.D., Matthias Woiczinski Ph.D., Patricia Davies-Knorr M.Sc., Boris M. Holzapfel M.D., Peter E. Müller M.D.
{"title":"Comparison of Biological Augmentation in Rotator Cuff Repair Using Inflamed Versus Noninflamed Bursal Tissue in Rats","authors":"Anja Z. Zhang M.D.,&nbsp;Andreas Ficklscherer M.D.,&nbsp;Thomas R. Niethammer M.D.,&nbsp;Matthias Woiczinski Ph.D.,&nbsp;Patricia Davies-Knorr M.Sc.,&nbsp;Boris M. Holzapfel M.D.,&nbsp;Peter E. Müller M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To examine how augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with inflamed versus noninflamed bursal tissue affects tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 136 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to an inflamed or noninflamed bursal tissue application group. After detachment, the supraspinatus tendon was reattached with bursal tissue sewn onto the tendon-to-bone interface. The specimens were analyzed biomechanically 6 and at 7 weeks and immunohistologically at 1 and at 7 weeks after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Immunohistological results showed no significant difference in the percentage of collagen type II in the tendon-to-bone interface at 1 (<em>P</em> = .87) and 7 weeks (<em>P</em> = .42) when using autologous noninflamed bursal tissue in comparison with inflamed bursal tissue specimens. The inflamed bursa group also showed no significant difference in collagen I to III quotient (<em>P</em> = .14) after surgery in comparison with noninflamed bursa groups after surgery. Biomechanical assessment showed that tendon stiffness (<em>P</em> = .87 inflamed versus noninflammed (resp.) <em>P</em> = .1) and the tendon viscoelasticity (<em>P</em> = .12 resp. <em>P</em> = .07) was the same after 6 and 7 weeks when we compared the inflamed bursa with the noninflamed bursa group. There was no significant difference (<em>P</em> = .8 resp. <em>P</em> = .87) in load to failure between in both inflamed and noninflamed bursa groups after 6 and 7 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Autologous inflamed bursal tissue derived from the Achilles bursa and implanted to the tendon-to-bone interface after rotator cuff repair facilitates the same histologic and biomechanical healing response as using a noninflamed bursa interposition in rats.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>During augmentation of a rotator cuff repair, it is irrelevant whether the bursa tissue is inflamed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"Pages 1316-1325"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324005723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To examine how augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with inflamed versus noninflamed bursal tissue affects tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model of rotator cuff repair.

Methods

A total of 136 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to an inflamed or noninflamed bursal tissue application group. After detachment, the supraspinatus tendon was reattached with bursal tissue sewn onto the tendon-to-bone interface. The specimens were analyzed biomechanically 6 and at 7 weeks and immunohistologically at 1 and at 7 weeks after surgery.

Results

Immunohistological results showed no significant difference in the percentage of collagen type II in the tendon-to-bone interface at 1 (P = .87) and 7 weeks (P = .42) when using autologous noninflamed bursal tissue in comparison with inflamed bursal tissue specimens. The inflamed bursa group also showed no significant difference in collagen I to III quotient (P = .14) after surgery in comparison with noninflamed bursa groups after surgery. Biomechanical assessment showed that tendon stiffness (P = .87 inflamed versus noninflammed (resp.) P = .1) and the tendon viscoelasticity (P = .12 resp. P = .07) was the same after 6 and 7 weeks when we compared the inflamed bursa with the noninflamed bursa group. There was no significant difference (P = .8 resp. P = .87) in load to failure between in both inflamed and noninflamed bursa groups after 6 and 7 weeks.

Conclusions

Autologous inflamed bursal tissue derived from the Achilles bursa and implanted to the tendon-to-bone interface after rotator cuff repair facilitates the same histologic and biomechanical healing response as using a noninflamed bursa interposition in rats.

Clinical Relevance

During augmentation of a rotator cuff repair, it is irrelevant whether the bursa tissue is inflamed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大鼠肩袖修复中使用发炎和未发炎滑囊组织进行生物增量的比较。
目的:在大鼠肩袖修复模型中,研究用发炎和未发炎的滑囊组织增强肩袖修复对肌腱与骨愈合的影响。方法:将 136 只 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠随机分配到发炎和未发炎的滑囊组织应用组。分离冈上肌腱后,将滑囊组织缝合在肌腱与骨的界面上。对标本进行了术后 6 周和 7 周的生物力学分析,以及术后 1 周和 7 周的免疫组织学分析:免疫组织学结果显示,在术后 1 周(p = 0.97)和 7 周(p = 0.42),使用自体非炎症滑囊组织与炎症滑囊组织标本相比,肌腱与骨界面中 II 型胶原蛋白的百分比无明显差异。与手术后的非发炎滑囊组相比,发炎滑囊组术后的胶原蛋白 I 至 III 商数也无明显差异(p= 0.14)。生物力学评估显示,6周和7周后,肌腱僵硬度(p = 0.87,p = 0.1)和肌腱粘弹性(p = 0.12,p = 0.07)与发炎滑囊组和未发炎滑囊组相比相同。6周和7周后,发炎滑囊组和未发炎滑囊组的破坏载荷无明显差异(p = 0.8 resp:结论:从跟腱滑囊中提取的自体发炎滑囊组织植入肩袖修复后的肌腱-骨界面,与在大鼠体内使用非发炎滑囊植入物相比,具有相同的组织学和生物力学愈合反应:临床相关性:在肩袖修复的增强过程中,滑囊组织是否发炎并不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Hip Microinstability-Now We Know What It Is, But What Do We Do About It? Introducing Matthew Salzler, M.D., as Deputy Editor. The Literature Shows Heterogeneity and Promise for the Role of Hip Arthroscopy Combined With Periacetabular Osteotomy for Dysplastic Patients, But Nuanced Decision Making and Further Research Are Required. Editorial Commentary: Subscapularis Tears With Advanced Fatty Infiltration: When Every Option Is Imperfect. Open Antegrade Muscle Advancement Reduces Retear Rates Compared to Arthroscopic Repair With Intra-articular Release in Subscapularis Tears With Advanced Fatty Infiltration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1