Effectiveness of exercise interventions, alone or in combination with dietary modifications, on working memory in overweight and obese individuals: A systematic review

Carlos Cristi-Montero, Victoria Barriga, Humberto Peña-Jorquera, Ricardo Martínez-Flores, Juan Pablo Espinoza-Puelles, Luis Alberto Flores Olivares, Estefania Quintana Mendias, Liliana Aracely Enriquez-del Castillo
{"title":"Effectiveness of exercise interventions, alone or in combination with dietary modifications, on working memory in overweight and obese individuals: A systematic review","authors":"Carlos Cristi-Montero,&nbsp;Victoria Barriga,&nbsp;Humberto Peña-Jorquera,&nbsp;Ricardo Martínez-Flores,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Espinoza-Puelles,&nbsp;Luis Alberto Flores Olivares,&nbsp;Estefania Quintana Mendias,&nbsp;Liliana Aracely Enriquez-del Castillo","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review aimed to establish the effectiveness of exercise interventions, alone or in combination with dietary modifications, on working memory (WM) in individuals living with overweight and obesity. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus, PubMed, Springer-Link, RefSeek, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant publications up to January 18, 2024. Data on participants' characteristics, intervention settings, and key outcomes related to WM were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. A total of 15 articles met pre-established inclusion criteria, involving participants across nine countries with a range of 12–125 individuals and ages spanning from 6 to 80 years old. Among the studies analyzed, 10 exclusively investigated exercise interventions, whereas five explored the combined effects. Notably, 70% of the exercise interventions (7 out of 10) exhibited positive improvements in WM. Likewise, 60% of the combined interventions (3 out of 5) demonstrated favorable enhancements in WM. No differences were found between the two protocols. Common features between the protocols were identified and described. Both protocols showed favorable and promising effects on WM in this clinical population. Nonetheless, the limited evidence addressing the combination of exercise and diet in the same research approach reduces the generalizability of the findings. This review offers valuable insights for future clinical and research applications in people with overweight and obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to establish the effectiveness of exercise interventions, alone or in combination with dietary modifications, on working memory (WM) in individuals living with overweight and obesity. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus, PubMed, Springer-Link, RefSeek, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant publications up to January 18, 2024. Data on participants' characteristics, intervention settings, and key outcomes related to WM were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. A total of 15 articles met pre-established inclusion criteria, involving participants across nine countries with a range of 12–125 individuals and ages spanning from 6 to 80 years old. Among the studies analyzed, 10 exclusively investigated exercise interventions, whereas five explored the combined effects. Notably, 70% of the exercise interventions (7 out of 10) exhibited positive improvements in WM. Likewise, 60% of the combined interventions (3 out of 5) demonstrated favorable enhancements in WM. No differences were found between the two protocols. Common features between the protocols were identified and described. Both protocols showed favorable and promising effects on WM in this clinical population. Nonetheless, the limited evidence addressing the combination of exercise and diet in the same research approach reduces the generalizability of the findings. This review offers valuable insights for future clinical and research applications in people with overweight and obesity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动干预(单独或与饮食调整相结合)对超重和肥胖者工作记忆的效果:系统综述。
本系统综述旨在确定运动干预(单独或与饮食调整相结合)对超重和肥胖症患者工作记忆(WM)的有效性。我们使用 Scopus、PubMed、Springer-Link、RefSeek 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以确定截至 2024 年 1 月 18 日的相关出版物。提取了与 WM 相关的参与者特征、干预设置和主要结果的数据。研究质量采用 PEDro 量表进行评估。共有 15 篇文章符合预先确定的纳入标准,涉及 9 个国家的参与者,人数在 12-125 人之间,年龄从 6 岁到 80 岁不等。在所分析的研究中,有 10 篇专门研究了运动干预,而有 5 篇则探讨了运动干预的综合效果。值得注意的是,70%的运动干预(10 项研究中的 7 项)显示出了对 WM 的积极改善。同样,60%的综合干预(5 项中的 3 项)也显示出了对 WM 的积极改善。两种方案之间没有发现差异。研究人员确定并描述了两种方案的共同特征。在这一临床人群中,两种方案都显示出了对 WM 有利且有希望的效果。尽管如此,在同一研究方法中结合运动和饮食的证据有限,降低了研究结果的普遍性。本综述为超重和肥胖症患者未来的临床和研究应用提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's rugby as a catalyst for advancing female-specific science and safety in sport. Case study of a world hour record simulation in an elite cyclist: Insight into task failure. Psychological and social factors associated with mental health of European dual career athletes: A systematic review. The effectiveness of cryostimulation exposure on sleep and recovery in male athletes: Timing considerations. The effects of plyometric versus resistance training on running economy and 5-km running time in middle-aged recreational runners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1