Practice variation in home care nursing: mapping potential explanations through a scoping review of the literature.

A E M Brabers, M A M Meijer, P P Groenewegen, N Bleijenberg, S Zwakhalen, J D de Jong
{"title":"Practice variation in home care nursing: mapping potential explanations through a scoping review of the literature.","authors":"A E M Brabers, M A M Meijer, P P Groenewegen, N Bleijenberg, S Zwakhalen, J D de Jong","doi":"10.1007/s43999-024-00048-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Needs assessment is the starting point of good home care as it determines which care is necessary, based on the needs of patients, their personal situation, and social context. There are indications that practice variation in needs assessment exists among home care nurses. However, little is known about potential explanations for this variation. Therefore, we explored potential explanations for practice variation in other areas and examined whether these explanations can be applied to explain variation in needs assessment in home care nursing. We conducted a scoping review of the literature on practice variation in (1) needs assessment in home care nursing, (2) home care nursing in general, and (3) medical care in general, with searches in PubMed and CINAHL. We assessed over 6,000 references. Ultimately, 386 studies were included. Explanations for practice variation were grouped into micro, meso and macro level. This scoping review provided insight into a wide variety of variables that might play a role in explaining practice variation in (needs assessment in) home care nursing, such as availability of guidelines, organisational culture, team norms, resources, and preferences of patients. However, the small literature on needs assessment by home care nurses devoted more attention to patients and their social context, compared to the literature on practice variation in general. We discuss how and to what extent these variables could relate to practice variation in (needs assessment in) home care nursing. Future research should empirically examine the role of these variables in explaining the observed practice variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520076,"journal":{"name":"Research in health services & regions","volume":"3 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11336153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in health services & regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43999-024-00048-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Needs assessment is the starting point of good home care as it determines which care is necessary, based on the needs of patients, their personal situation, and social context. There are indications that practice variation in needs assessment exists among home care nurses. However, little is known about potential explanations for this variation. Therefore, we explored potential explanations for practice variation in other areas and examined whether these explanations can be applied to explain variation in needs assessment in home care nursing. We conducted a scoping review of the literature on practice variation in (1) needs assessment in home care nursing, (2) home care nursing in general, and (3) medical care in general, with searches in PubMed and CINAHL. We assessed over 6,000 references. Ultimately, 386 studies were included. Explanations for practice variation were grouped into micro, meso and macro level. This scoping review provided insight into a wide variety of variables that might play a role in explaining practice variation in (needs assessment in) home care nursing, such as availability of guidelines, organisational culture, team norms, resources, and preferences of patients. However, the small literature on needs assessment by home care nurses devoted more attention to patients and their social context, compared to the literature on practice variation in general. We discuss how and to what extent these variables could relate to practice variation in (needs assessment in) home care nursing. Future research should empirically examine the role of these variables in explaining the observed practice variation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居家护理中的实践差异:通过对文献的概括性回顾找出潜在的解释。
需求评估是良好家庭护理的起点,因为它根据病人的需求、个人情况和社会环境来确定哪些护理是必要的。有迹象表明,家庭护理护士在需求评估方面存在实践差异。然而,人们对造成这种差异的潜在原因知之甚少。因此,我们探讨了其他领域实践差异的潜在解释,并研究了这些解释是否可用于解释居家护理需求评估的差异。我们通过在 PubMed 和 CINAHL 上检索,对有关以下领域实践差异的文献进行了范围性综述:(1) 居家护理需求评估;(2) 一般居家护理;(3) 一般医疗护理。我们评估了 6,000 多篇参考文献。最终纳入了 386 项研究。对实践差异的解释分为微观、中观和宏观三个层面。通过此次范围界定综述,我们深入了解了在解释居家护理(需求评估)实践差异方面可能起作用的各种变量,如指南的可用性、组织文化、团队规范、资源和患者偏好。然而,与有关一般实践差异的文献相比,有关居家护理护士需求评估的少量文献更关注病人及其社会背景。我们讨论了这些变量如何以及在多大程度上与居家护理(需求评估)中的实践差异相关。未来的研究应从实证角度研究这些变量在解释所观察到的实践差异中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regional variation in ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations for people with type 2 diabetes in Germany: insights from a claims data analysis using the PopGrouper. Using the Socio-Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) approach to support chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management resource allocation in integrated care systems in England. Adapting the German demand planning guideline for physiotherapy: a cross-sectional analysis from Lower Saxony. Online reviews in primary care - a mimicry indicator of quality? A comparative analysis across urban and rural regions in Germany. Attitudes toward and regional utilization of age-specific vaccinations from the age of 60 in Saxony-Anhalt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1