Dans quelle mesure stigmatisons-nous les patients souffrant de douleurs chroniques, enquête nationale auprès des kinésithérapeutes français ?

Q4 Medicine Kinesitherapie Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.kine.2024.05.011
{"title":"Dans quelle mesure stigmatisons-nous les patients souffrant de douleurs chroniques, enquête nationale auprès des kinésithérapeutes français ?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.kine.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chronic pain represents a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Therapeutic Alliance appears to be a key determinant of treatment outcomes in the context of chronic pain. Conversely, stigmatization could have a detrimental effect. To date, no study has documented the stigmatization behavior among French physiotherapists treating chronic pain.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A mixed-method study was self-administered online to assess both stigmatization behavior and the tool used by the physiotherapist to evaluate therapeutic alliance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty participants included. In all, 92,5% of physiotherapists have already been compelled to refuse a patient due to the chronic nature of their pain. Stigmatizing behaviors are very common. Very few of them assess the quality of their therapeutic alliance in practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Stigmatization is common among French physiotherapist when treating chronic pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35491,"journal":{"name":"Kinesitherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesitherapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1779012324001621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic pain represents a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Therapeutic Alliance appears to be a key determinant of treatment outcomes in the context of chronic pain. Conversely, stigmatization could have a detrimental effect. To date, no study has documented the stigmatization behavior among French physiotherapists treating chronic pain.

Material and methods

A mixed-method study was self-administered online to assess both stigmatization behavior and the tool used by the physiotherapist to evaluate therapeutic alliance.

Results

Forty participants included. In all, 92,5% of physiotherapists have already been compelled to refuse a patient due to the chronic nature of their pain. Stigmatizing behaviors are very common. Very few of them assess the quality of their therapeutic alliance in practice.

Conclusions

Stigmatization is common among French physiotherapist when treating chronic pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国物理治疗师全国调查:我们在多大程度上鄙视慢性疼痛患者?
背景慢性疼痛给患者和医疗系统都带来了沉重的负担。治疗联盟似乎是决定慢性疼痛治疗效果的关键因素。相反,污名化可能会产生不利影响。迄今为止,还没有一项研究记录了法国物理治疗师在治疗慢性疼痛时的鄙视行为。材料与方法一项混合方法研究通过在线自填的方式对鄙视行为和物理治疗师用于评估治疗联盟的工具进行评估。92.5%的物理治疗师曾因患者的慢性疼痛而不得不拒绝其治疗。污名化行为非常普遍。结论法国物理治疗师在治疗慢性疼痛时普遍存在鄙视行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kinesitherapie
Kinesitherapie Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Kinésithérapie, la revue adresse aux praticiens et aux étudiants qui veulent lire des informations accessibles et utiles. Ce est la première revue francophone paramédicale à être indexée dans une base de données internationale - Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature : CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Sommaire Agenda Microscopique versus macroscopique, ou l’arbre qui cache la forêt Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1