Effects of longitudinal profile shape on scour and flow resistance in rills

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/ejss.13561
Alessio Nicosia, Vincenzo Palmeri, Costanza Di Stefano, Vincenzo Pampalone, Gaetano Guida, Vito Ferro
{"title":"Effects of longitudinal profile shape on scour and flow resistance in rills","authors":"Alessio Nicosia,&nbsp;Vincenzo Palmeri,&nbsp;Costanza Di Stefano,&nbsp;Vincenzo Pampalone,&nbsp;Gaetano Guida,&nbsp;Vito Ferro","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The literature regarding how rill longitudinal profile (concave and convex) affects soil loss and flow resistance is still lacking. The only analysis available in the literature for rills is limited by the fact that measurements were performed for a unique mean slope value <i>s</i><sub>p</sub> (18%). In this article, further rill measurements were conducted on a plot with <i>s</i><sub>p</sub> = 15% and complex profile shapes and were used to widen the knowledge about the influence of longitudinal profile shape on rill scour, eroded volume, and flow resistance. The findings highlighted that the concave profile has a homogeneous spatial distribution of moderate scours, whereas the scours in the convex one are deeper and more confined, but they are not placed after the slope change as found for <i>s</i><sub>p</sub> = 18%. The mean scour depth, which accounts for the discharge and profile shape effects, is not (concave) or is weakly (convex) related to the flow discharge. The concave profile determined a reduction of approximately 57% of the total eroded volume when compared with the convex profile shape, confirming that a concave hillslope limits erosive phenomena. Finally, the flow resistance equation guaranteed a precise estimation of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13561","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature regarding how rill longitudinal profile (concave and convex) affects soil loss and flow resistance is still lacking. The only analysis available in the literature for rills is limited by the fact that measurements were performed for a unique mean slope value sp (18%). In this article, further rill measurements were conducted on a plot with sp = 15% and complex profile shapes and were used to widen the knowledge about the influence of longitudinal profile shape on rill scour, eroded volume, and flow resistance. The findings highlighted that the concave profile has a homogeneous spatial distribution of moderate scours, whereas the scours in the convex one are deeper and more confined, but they are not placed after the slope change as found for sp = 18%. The mean scour depth, which accounts for the discharge and profile shape effects, is not (concave) or is weakly (convex) related to the flow discharge. The concave profile determined a reduction of approximately 57% of the total eroded volume when compared with the convex profile shape, confirming that a concave hillslope limits erosive phenomena. Finally, the flow resistance equation guaranteed a precise estimation of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵剖面形状对激流冲刷和流动阻力的影响
有关溪流纵剖面(凹面和凸面)如何影响土壤流失和流动阻力的文献仍然缺乏。文献中仅有的关于碾压的分析受到了以下事实的限制:测量是针对唯一的平均坡度值 sp(18%)进行的。本文对 sp = 15%、剖面形状复杂的地块进行了进一步的碾压测量,以拓宽纵剖面形状对碾压冲刷、侵蚀量和流动阻力影响的认识。研究结果表明,凹形剖面上的中等冲刷空间分布均匀,而凸形剖面上的冲刷则更深、更密集,但它们并不像 sp = 18% 时那样位于坡度变化之后。考虑到排水量和剖面形状影响的平均冲刷深度与排水量无关(凹)或关系不大(凸)。与凸形剖面相比,凹形剖面决定了侵蚀总量减少了约 57%,这证实了凹形山坡限制了侵蚀现象。最后,流阻方程保证了对达西-韦斯巴赫摩擦因数的精确估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input? No relationship between outputs of simple humus balance calculators (VDLUFA and STAND) and soil organic carbon trends A GSD‐driven approach to deriving stochastic soil strength parameters under hybrid machine learning models Further reduction in soil bacterial diversity under severe acidification in European temperate forests Effect of brackish water inundation on temperate coastal acid sulfate soils under different vegetation types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1