Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL-2): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae081
Matthew G Davey, Noel E Donlon, Stewart R Walsh, Claire L Donohoe
{"title":"Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL-2): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Matthew G Davey, Noel E Donlon, Stewart R Walsh, Claire L Donohoe","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A proportion of patients undergoing midline laparotomy will develop surgical site infections after surgery. These complications place considerable financial burden on healthcare economies and have negative implications for patient health and quality of life. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy devices has been mooted as a pragmatic strategy to reduce surgical site infections. Nevertheless, further availability of multicentre randomized clinical trial data evaluating the prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy following midline laparotomy is warranted to definitely provide consensus in relation to these closure methods, while also deciphering potential differences among subgroups. The aim of this study is to determine whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing midline laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PROPEL-2 is a multicentre prospective randomized clinical trial designed to compare standard surgical dressings (control arm) with negative pressure wound therapy dressings (Prevena™ and PICO™ being the most commonly utilized). Patient recruitment will include adult patients aged 18 years or over, who are indicated to undergo emergency or elective laparotomy. To achieve 90% power at the 5% significance level, 1006 patients will be required in each arm, which when allowing for losses to follow-up, 10% will be added to each arm, leaving the total projected sample size to be 2013 patients, who will be recruited across a 36-month enrolment period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PROPEL-2 trial will be the largest independent multicentre randomized clinical trial designed to assess the role of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients indicated to undergo midline laparotomy. The comparison of standard treatment to two commercially available negative pressure wound therapy devices will help provide consensus on the routine management of laparotomy wounds. Enrolment to PROPEL-2 began in June 2023. Registration number: NCT05977816 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A proportion of patients undergoing midline laparotomy will develop surgical site infections after surgery. These complications place considerable financial burden on healthcare economies and have negative implications for patient health and quality of life. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy devices has been mooted as a pragmatic strategy to reduce surgical site infections. Nevertheless, further availability of multicentre randomized clinical trial data evaluating the prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy following midline laparotomy is warranted to definitely provide consensus in relation to these closure methods, while also deciphering potential differences among subgroups. The aim of this study is to determine whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing midline laparotomy.

Methods: PROPEL-2 is a multicentre prospective randomized clinical trial designed to compare standard surgical dressings (control arm) with negative pressure wound therapy dressings (Prevena™ and PICO™ being the most commonly utilized). Patient recruitment will include adult patients aged 18 years or over, who are indicated to undergo emergency or elective laparotomy. To achieve 90% power at the 5% significance level, 1006 patients will be required in each arm, which when allowing for losses to follow-up, 10% will be added to each arm, leaving the total projected sample size to be 2013 patients, who will be recruited across a 36-month enrolment period.

Conclusion: The PROPEL-2 trial will be the largest independent multicentre randomized clinical trial designed to assess the role of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients indicated to undergo midline laparotomy. The comparison of standard treatment to two commercially available negative pressure wound therapy devices will help provide consensus on the routine management of laparotomy wounds. Enrolment to PROPEL-2 began in June 2023. Registration number: NCT05977816 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开腹手术伤口预防性负压疗法(NPWT)(PROPEL-2):随机临床试验方案。
背景:一部分接受中线开腹手术的患者会在术后发生手术部位感染。这些并发症给医疗经济造成了巨大的经济负担,并对患者的健康和生活质量产生了负面影响。预防性应用负压伤口治疗设备被认为是减少手术部位感染的实用策略。尽管如此,仍有必要进一步提供多中心随机临床试验数据,对中线开腹手术后预防性使用负压伤口疗法进行评估,以便就这些闭合方法达成共识,同时解读亚组之间的潜在差异。本研究旨在确定预防性负压伤口疗法是否能减少中线开腹手术患者的术后伤口并发症:PROPEL-2 是一项多中心前瞻性随机临床试验,旨在比较标准手术敷料(对照组)和负压伤口治疗敷料(Prevena™ 和 PICO™ 是最常用的敷料)。患者招募将包括年龄在 18 周岁或以上、有接受急诊或择期开腹手术指征的成年患者。为了在5%的显著性水平下达到90%的功率,每组需要1006名患者,如果考虑到随访损失,每组将增加10%,因此预计样本总数为2013名患者,招募期为36个月:PROPEL-2试验将是规模最大的独立多中心随机临床试验,旨在评估预防性负压伤口疗法在中线开腹手术患者中的作用。将标准治疗与两种市售负压伤口治疗设备进行比较,将有助于就开腹手术伤口的常规管理达成共识。PROPEL-2 于 2023 年 6 月开始注册。注册号NCT05977816 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
期刊最新文献
Classifying histopathological growth patterns for resected colorectal liver metastasis with a deep learning analysis. Short-term outcomes depending on type of oesophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective study based on a Korean Nationwide Survey for Gastric Cancer in 2019. Association of postoperative opioid type with mortality and readmission rates: multicentre retrospective cohort study. Effects of the superior mesenteric artery approach versus the no-touch approach during pancreatoduodenectomy on the mobilization of circulating tumour cells and clusters in pancreatic cancer (CETUPANC): randomized clinical trial. Reported outcomes in studies of intermittent claudication - first step toward a core outcome set: systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1