Getinet Ayano , Rosanna Rooney , Christina M. Pollard , Jaya A.R. Dantas , Roanna Lobo , Zakia Jeemi , Sharyn Burns , Robert Cunningham , Stephen Monterosso , Lynne Millar , Sharinaz Hassan , Sender Dovchin , Rhonda Oliver , Kael Coleman , Rosa Alati
{"title":"Risk and protective factors of youth crime: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses","authors":"Getinet Ayano , Rosanna Rooney , Christina M. Pollard , Jaya A.R. Dantas , Roanna Lobo , Zakia Jeemi , Sharyn Burns , Robert Cunningham , Stephen Monterosso , Lynne Millar , Sharinaz Hassan , Sender Dovchin , Rhonda Oliver , Kael Coleman , Rosa Alati","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on the risk and protective factors of youth crime. This study aims to consolidate this evidence using an umbrella review methodology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic electronic search was conducted using multiple electronic databases. Strength of associations was evaluated using quantitative umbrella review criteria, and AMSTAR was used to assess the quality of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 58 factors identified, 11 factors were supported by highly suggestive or suggestive evidence. Evidence of association was highly suggestive (class II) for substance use (odds ratio [OR] = 2·29, 95%CI 1·58–3.01), previous history of crime (OR = 2·03, 95%CI 1·62–2·45), moral development (OR = 3·98, 95%CI 3·57–4·39), psychopathology (OR = 2·22, 95%CI 1.40–2.69), adverse childhood experiences (OR = 1·37, 95%CI = 1·36–1·38), poor parental supervision (OR = 1·85, 95%CI 1·83–1·87), maltreatment or neglect (OR = 1·34, 95%CI 1·08–1·65), attachment (OR = 1·94; 95%CI 1.93–1·95), and school bullying (OR = 2·50; 95%CI 2·03–3·08); and suggestive (class III) for peer pressure (OR = 2·11, 95%CI 2·06–2·16) and supportive school environments (OR = 0·56; 95%CI 0·55–0·57).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The evidence-based atlas of key risk and protective factors identified in this umbrella review could be used as a benchmark for advancing research, prevention, and early intervention strategies for youth crime.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102479"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001004/pdfft?md5=648bcbdbc167c8b954a8f45287d934df&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001004-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on the risk and protective factors of youth crime. This study aims to consolidate this evidence using an umbrella review methodology.
Methods
A systematic electronic search was conducted using multiple electronic databases. Strength of associations was evaluated using quantitative umbrella review criteria, and AMSTAR was used to assess the quality of the studies.
Results
Among the 58 factors identified, 11 factors were supported by highly suggestive or suggestive evidence. Evidence of association was highly suggestive (class II) for substance use (odds ratio [OR] = 2·29, 95%CI 1·58–3.01), previous history of crime (OR = 2·03, 95%CI 1·62–2·45), moral development (OR = 3·98, 95%CI 3·57–4·39), psychopathology (OR = 2·22, 95%CI 1.40–2.69), adverse childhood experiences (OR = 1·37, 95%CI = 1·36–1·38), poor parental supervision (OR = 1·85, 95%CI 1·83–1·87), maltreatment or neglect (OR = 1·34, 95%CI 1·08–1·65), attachment (OR = 1·94; 95%CI 1.93–1·95), and school bullying (OR = 2·50; 95%CI 2·03–3·08); and suggestive (class III) for peer pressure (OR = 2·11, 95%CI 2·06–2·16) and supportive school environments (OR = 0·56; 95%CI 0·55–0·57).
Conclusion
The evidence-based atlas of key risk and protective factors identified in this umbrella review could be used as a benchmark for advancing research, prevention, and early intervention strategies for youth crime.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.