Appendectomy: Cross-sectional study of the effects of COVID-19 in a hospital in South Brazil

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.08.003
{"title":"Appendectomy: Cross-sectional study of the effects of COVID-19 in a hospital in South Brazil","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 has further burdened the Brazilian healthcare system, especially emergencies. Patients may have delayed seeking care for surgical abdominal pain. Delays in the approach may have impacted clinical evolution and outcomes. This study evaluated appendectomies and their complications performed by the public system during one-year follow-up of COVID-19 in a hospital in southern Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, we included adult patients who underwent appendectomy from March 2019 to April 2021 (n = 162). Patients were divided into pre-pandemic (n = 78) and pandemic (n = 84) groups based on the surgery date. The analyzed variables included hospitalization duration, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgical approach, histopathological findings, COVID-19 testing, patient outcomes, and 30-day survival rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cohorts exhibited similar epidemiology, with the sex ratio and average age being maintained. No statistical difference was found in the 30-day survival rate and clinical outcomes. Of the four patients admitted to the ICU, three belonged to the pandemic cohort and tested negative for COVID-19. Only 47.6 % of the patients in the pandemic cohort underwent COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction examination; one tested positive (2.5 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrated that there was no increased risk for appendectomies during the first wave of the pandemic. Surgeries were safe during this period. Patients continued to access the emergency service despite surgical abdominal pain and restrictive measures imposed by health authorities. The similar results observed across cohorts are attributed to the readiness of the teams and the availability of medical surgical equipment in safe quantities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001131/pdfft?md5=c5271b6fd984bfdd1db3b3a7eff21fa4&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024001131-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 has further burdened the Brazilian healthcare system, especially emergencies. Patients may have delayed seeking care for surgical abdominal pain. Delays in the approach may have impacted clinical evolution and outcomes. This study evaluated appendectomies and their complications performed by the public system during one-year follow-up of COVID-19 in a hospital in southern Brazil.

Materials and methods

In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, we included adult patients who underwent appendectomy from March 2019 to April 2021 (n = 162). Patients were divided into pre-pandemic (n = 78) and pandemic (n = 84) groups based on the surgery date. The analyzed variables included hospitalization duration, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgical approach, histopathological findings, COVID-19 testing, patient outcomes, and 30-day survival rate.

Results

The cohorts exhibited similar epidemiology, with the sex ratio and average age being maintained. No statistical difference was found in the 30-day survival rate and clinical outcomes. Of the four patients admitted to the ICU, three belonged to the pandemic cohort and tested negative for COVID-19. Only 47.6 % of the patients in the pandemic cohort underwent COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction examination; one tested positive (2.5 %).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that there was no increased risk for appendectomies during the first wave of the pandemic. Surgeries were safe during this period. Patients continued to access the emergency service despite surgical abdominal pain and restrictive measures imposed by health authorities. The similar results observed across cohorts are attributed to the readiness of the teams and the availability of medical surgical equipment in safe quantities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阑尾切除术:南巴西一家医院对 COVID-19 效果的横断面研究
背景COVID-19 进一步加重了巴西医疗系统的负担,尤其是急诊。患者可能推迟了手术腹痛的就医时间。治疗方法的延误可能会影响临床演变和治疗效果。本研究对巴西南部一家医院在 COVID-19 一年随访期间由公共系统实施的阑尾切除术及其并发症进行了评估。在这项基于医院的横断面研究中,我们纳入了在 2019 年 3 月至 2021 年 4 月期间接受阑尾切除术的成年患者(n = 162)。根据手术日期将患者分为大流行前组(n = 78)和大流行组(n = 84)。分析变量包括住院时间、入住重症监护室(ICU)、手术方式、组织病理学结果、COVID-19检测、患者预后和30天存活率。30 天存活率和临床结果无统计学差异。在重症监护室收治的四名患者中,三名属于大流行组群,COVID-19检测结果呈阴性。只有 47.6% 的大流行患者接受了 COVID-19 聚合酶链反应检查;其中一人检测结果呈阳性(2.5%)。在此期间,手术是安全的。尽管有手术腹痛和卫生当局采取的限制措施,但患者仍继续使用急诊服务。不同组别中观察到的结果相似,这归功于医疗队的准备充分以及安全数量的医疗手术设备的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Rapid liver graft implantation in canine: A preliminary study A nomogram for cancer-specific survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients: A SEER based analysis Investigation and self-assessment of liver transplantation training physicians at Shanghai Renji Hospital: A preliminary study Optimizing the role of scrub nurses during robotic surgery console time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1