Racial Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fixed-dose Combination of Dapagliflozin/Sitagliptin in Western and Korean Healthy Adults

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.07.007
Pradeep B. Lukka PhD , Weifeng Tang PhD , Ann Hammarstedt PhD , Tom Conrad PhD , Maria Heijer MSc , Cecilia Karlsson MD, PhD , David W. Boulton PhD
{"title":"Racial Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fixed-dose Combination of Dapagliflozin/Sitagliptin in Western and Korean Healthy Adults","authors":"Pradeep B. Lukka PhD ,&nbsp;Weifeng Tang PhD ,&nbsp;Ann Hammarstedt PhD ,&nbsp;Tom Conrad PhD ,&nbsp;Maria Heijer MSc ,&nbsp;Cecilia Karlsson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David W. Boulton PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin/sitagliptin versus individual component (IC) tablets in healthy Western and Korean participants. The combination of these antihyperglycemic drugs provides efficient glucose control, and the use of FDC has generally been shown to improve medication adherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, single-center, crossover bioequivalence studies conducted on healthy fasted German participants (aged 18–55 years; Western study) and South Korean participants (aged 19–55 years; Korean study) were included. In both studies, pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum [peak] plasma concentration [C<sub>max</sub>], area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration [AUC<sub>last</sub>], and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to infinity [AUC<sub>inf</sub>]) were used to assess the bioequivalence of 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC (Treatment A) with their ICs (Treatment B) under fasted conditions. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Forty-six healthy participants (male, 60.9%; mean age, 39.5 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 23.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomized in the Western study, and 51 healthy participants (male, 100.0%; mean age, 24.6 years; mean BMI, 23.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomized in the Korean study. In both studies, the participants were randomized 1:1 into treatment sequence AB and treatment sequence BA. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC was bioequivalent to IC tablets in both Western and Korean studies, as the 90% confidence interval of the FDC to IC ratios of the geometric least-squares means of the pharmacokinetic parameters for both dapagliflozin and sitagliptin was within the 0.8000–1.2500 bioequivalence criterion limit. The observed differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, such as C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>last</sub>, and AUC<sub>inf</sub>, between the Western and Korean studies were not clinically meaningful. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC and their ICs were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported in any of the study populations.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>The 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC and IC formulations were bioequivalent in fasted healthy Western and Korean participants, with no new safety concerns identified, thus offering a useful alternative for patients currently receiving individual medications as part of their treatment regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>Western study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05266404) and Korean study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05453786).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291824002054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin/sitagliptin versus individual component (IC) tablets in healthy Western and Korean participants. The combination of these antihyperglycemic drugs provides efficient glucose control, and the use of FDC has generally been shown to improve medication adherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

Two randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, single-center, crossover bioequivalence studies conducted on healthy fasted German participants (aged 18–55 years; Western study) and South Korean participants (aged 19–55 years; Korean study) were included. In both studies, pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum [peak] plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to infinity [AUCinf]) were used to assess the bioequivalence of 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC (Treatment A) with their ICs (Treatment B) under fasted conditions. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.

Findings

Forty-six healthy participants (male, 60.9%; mean age, 39.5 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 23.9 kg/m2) were randomized in the Western study, and 51 healthy participants (male, 100.0%; mean age, 24.6 years; mean BMI, 23.9 kg/m2) were randomized in the Korean study. In both studies, the participants were randomized 1:1 into treatment sequence AB and treatment sequence BA. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC was bioequivalent to IC tablets in both Western and Korean studies, as the 90% confidence interval of the FDC to IC ratios of the geometric least-squares means of the pharmacokinetic parameters for both dapagliflozin and sitagliptin was within the 0.8000–1.2500 bioequivalence criterion limit. The observed differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, such as Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf, between the Western and Korean studies were not clinically meaningful. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC and their ICs were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported in any of the study populations.

Implications

The 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC and IC formulations were bioequivalent in fasted healthy Western and Korean participants, with no new safety concerns identified, thus offering a useful alternative for patients currently receiving individual medications as part of their treatment regimen.

Clinical trial registration

Western study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05266404) and Korean study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05453786).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西方和韩国健康成年人服用达帕格列净/西他列汀固定剂量复方制剂的药代动力学和安全性的种族比较
目的:我们评估了达帕利洛嗪/西他列汀固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)与单个成分片剂(IC)在西方和韩国健康参与者中的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性。这些降糖药物的联合用药可有效控制血糖,而且使用固定剂量复方制剂通常可提高2型糖尿病患者的服药依从性:方法: 两项随机、开放标签、两阶段、两疗程、单剂量、单中心、交叉生物等效性研究分别针对空腹的健康德国参与者(18-55 岁;西方研究)和韩国参与者(19-55 岁;韩国研究)。在这两项研究中,药代动力学参数(最大[峰值]血浆浓度[Cmax]、从零到最后可定量浓度的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUClast]和从零到无穷大的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUCinf])被用于评估 10 毫克达帕格列净/100 毫克西他列汀 FDC(治疗 A)与它们的 IC(治疗 B)在禁食条件下的生物等效性。在整个研究过程中对安全性和耐受性进行了评估:在西方研究中,46名健康参与者(男性,60.9%;平均年龄,39.5岁;平均体重指数[BMI],23.9 kg/m2)被随机选中;在韩国研究中,51名健康参与者(男性,100.0%;平均年龄,24.6岁;平均体重指数[BMI],23.9 kg/m2)被随机选中。在这两项研究中,参与者按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到治疗序列 AB 和治疗序列 BA 中。在西方和韩国的研究中,达帕格列净/西他列汀 FDC 与 IC 片剂具有生物等效性,因为达帕格列净和西他列汀的药代动力学参数几何最小二乘均值的 FDC 与 IC 比值的 90% 置信区间均在 0.8000-1.2500 生物等效性标准限内。在药代动力学参数(如 Cmax、AUClast 和 AUCinf)方面,西方研究与韩国研究之间观察到的差异没有临床意义。达帕格列净/西他列汀 FDC 及其 ICs 的耐受性良好,在所有研究人群中均未报告严重不良事件:10毫克达帕格列净/100毫克西他列汀FDC和IC制剂在空腹的西方和韩国健康参与者中具有生物等效性,没有发现新的安全性问题,因此为目前接受单药治疗的患者提供了一种有用的替代方案:临床试验注册:西方研究(clinicaltrials.gov:NCT05266404)和韩国研究(clinicaltrials.gov:NCT05453786)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Sex and Gender in Precision Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review and Proposed Hierarchy. Sex Differences in Testing for Pulmonary Embolism Among Emergency Department Patients Aged 18-49 by Chief Complaint. The Efficacy Research of Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in Preventing Neutropenia in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis. Correlation Between Vitamin D, Inflammatory Markers, and T Lymphocytes With the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and its Effect on the Risk of Acute Exacerbation: A Single Cross-sectional Study. Understanding Variation Among Medical Device Reporting Sources: A Study of the MAUDE Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1