The impact of cadaveric donor transplant on the development of chronic rhinosinusitis and recalcitrant disease.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1002/alr.23429
Estephania Candelo, Anyull D Bohorquez-Caballero, Karol Avila-Castano, Hani Wadei, Angela M Donaldson
{"title":"The impact of cadaveric donor transplant on the development of chronic rhinosinusitis and recalcitrant disease.","authors":"Estephania Candelo, Anyull D Bohorquez-Caballero, Karol Avila-Castano, Hani Wadei, Angela M Donaldson","doi":"10.1002/alr.23429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Key points: </strong>The study found a higher incidence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and recalcitrant CRS in cadaveric organ transplant recipients compared to those receiving living donor transplants. Recipients of cadaveric transplants were 1.32 times more likely to develop CRS and 1.68 times more likely to develop medically recalcitrant CRS. Living kidney transplants significantly reduced the risk of developing CRS (OR = 0.12) and recalcitrant CRS (OR = 0.11), highlighting a potentially protective effect against these conditions. In contrast, cadaveric liver transplants were associated with an increased risk of CRS and medically recalcitrant CRS. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a significant difference in time to CRS onset between cadaveric and living donor transplants. Median time to CRS onset was longer for living donor recipients (21.1 months) compared to cadaveric recipients (15.6 months). This study underscores the need for transplant teams and otolaryngologist to consider donor type during transplant follow-up due to differing risks of CRS development.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Key points: The study found a higher incidence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and recalcitrant CRS in cadaveric organ transplant recipients compared to those receiving living donor transplants. Recipients of cadaveric transplants were 1.32 times more likely to develop CRS and 1.68 times more likely to develop medically recalcitrant CRS. Living kidney transplants significantly reduced the risk of developing CRS (OR = 0.12) and recalcitrant CRS (OR = 0.11), highlighting a potentially protective effect against these conditions. In contrast, cadaveric liver transplants were associated with an increased risk of CRS and medically recalcitrant CRS. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a significant difference in time to CRS onset between cadaveric and living donor transplants. Median time to CRS onset was longer for living donor recipients (21.1 months) compared to cadaveric recipients (15.6 months). This study underscores the need for transplant teams and otolaryngologist to consider donor type during transplant follow-up due to differing risks of CRS development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尸体供体移植对慢性鼻炎和顽固性疾病发展的影响。
要点研究发现,与接受活体器官移植的受者相比,尸体器官移植受者的慢性鼻炎(CRS)和顽固性CRS发病率更高。尸体器官移植受者患 CRS 的几率是活体器官移植受者的 1.32 倍,患药物难治性 CRS 的几率是活体器官移植受者的 1.68 倍。活体肾移植大大降低了罹患CRS(OR = 0.12)和顽固性CRS(OR = 0.11)的风险,凸显了对这些疾病的潜在保护作用。相比之下,尸体肝移植与CRS和医学上顽固的CRS风险增加有关。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,尸体移植和活体移植的CRS发病时间存在显著差异。活体器官移植受者发生 CRS 的中位时间(21.1 个月)长于尸体器官移植受者(15.6 个月)。这项研究强调,由于 CRS 发生的风险不同,移植团队和耳鼻喉科医生在移植随访过程中需要考虑供体类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
期刊最新文献
Guidance for the evaluation by payors of claims submitted using Current Procedural Terminology codes 95165, 95115, and 95117. Making "scents" of nutrients: Investigating the relationship between olfactory dysfunction and vitamin intake. Surgery versus biologics for nasal polyposis: Perspective on contemporary data. Issue Information Ambient particulate matter and frequency of outpatient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1