Health inequality in medieval Cambridge, 1200–1500 CE

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.24993
Jenna M. Dittmar, Sarah A. Inskip, Alice K. Rose, Craig Cessford, Piers D. Mitchell, Tamsin C. O'Connell, John E. Robb
{"title":"Health inequality in medieval Cambridge, 1200–1500 CE","authors":"Jenna M. Dittmar,&nbsp;Sarah A. Inskip,&nbsp;Alice K. Rose,&nbsp;Craig Cessford,&nbsp;Piers D. Mitchell,&nbsp;Tamsin C. O'Connell,&nbsp;John E. Robb","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.24993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Health inequality is not only a major problem today; it left its mark upon past societies too. For much of the past, health inequality has been poorly studied, mostly because bioarchaeologists have concentrated upon single sites rather than a broader social landscape. This article compares 476 adults in multiple locations of medieval Cambridge (UK). Samples include ordinary townspeople (All Saints), people living in a charitable institution (the Hospital of St. John), and members of a religious order (the Augustinian Friary). These groups shared many conditions of life, such as a similar range of diseases, risk of injury, and vertebral disk degeneration. However, people living on charity had more indicators of poor childhood health and diet, lower adult stature, and a younger age at death, reflecting the health effects of poverty. In contrast, the Augustinian friars were members of a prosperous, well-endowed religious house. Compared with other groups, they were taller (perhaps a result of a richer diet during their adolescent growth period); their adult carbon and nitrogen isotope values are higher, suggesting a diet higher in terrestrial and/or marine animal protein; and they had the highest prevalence of foot problems related to fashionable late medieval footwear. As this illustrates, health inequality will take particular forms depending upon the specificities of a social landscape; except in unusual circumstances where a site and its skeletal samples represent a real cross-section of society, inequality is best investigated by comparison across sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"185 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajpa.24993","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health inequality is not only a major problem today; it left its mark upon past societies too. For much of the past, health inequality has been poorly studied, mostly because bioarchaeologists have concentrated upon single sites rather than a broader social landscape. This article compares 476 adults in multiple locations of medieval Cambridge (UK). Samples include ordinary townspeople (All Saints), people living in a charitable institution (the Hospital of St. John), and members of a religious order (the Augustinian Friary). These groups shared many conditions of life, such as a similar range of diseases, risk of injury, and vertebral disk degeneration. However, people living on charity had more indicators of poor childhood health and diet, lower adult stature, and a younger age at death, reflecting the health effects of poverty. In contrast, the Augustinian friars were members of a prosperous, well-endowed religious house. Compared with other groups, they were taller (perhaps a result of a richer diet during their adolescent growth period); their adult carbon and nitrogen isotope values are higher, suggesting a diet higher in terrestrial and/or marine animal protein; and they had the highest prevalence of foot problems related to fashionable late medieval footwear. As this illustrates, health inequality will take particular forms depending upon the specificities of a social landscape; except in unusual circumstances where a site and its skeletal samples represent a real cross-section of society, inequality is best investigated by comparison across sites.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中世纪剑桥(公元 1200-1500 年)的健康不平等现象。
健康不平等不仅是当今的一个主要问题,它在过去的社会中也留下了印记。在过去的大部分时间里,人们对健康不平等的研究很少,这主要是因为生物考古学家只关注单个遗址,而不是更广泛的社会景观。本文比较了英国剑桥中世纪多个地点的 476 名成年人。样本包括普通城镇居民(万圣)、生活在慈善机构(圣约翰医院)的人以及宗教团体(奥古斯丁修道会)的成员。这些群体有许多共同的生活条件,如相似的疾病种类、受伤风险和椎间盘退化。然而,靠慈善为生的人有更多的童年健康和饮食不良指标,成年后身材矮小,死亡年龄较小,这反映了贫穷对健康的影响。与此相反,奥古斯丁修士是一个富裕的宗教团体的成员。与其他群体相比,他们的身高更高(可能是青少年生长期饮食更丰富的结果);他们的成年碳和氮同位素值更高,表明他们的饮食中陆地和/或海洋动物蛋白含量更高;他们的足部疾病发病率最高,这与中世纪晚期流行的鞋类有关。由此可见,健康方面的不平等会因社会环境的特殊性而表现出特定的形式;除非在特殊情况下,某个遗址及其骨骼样本代表了社会的真实横截面,否则最好通过对不同遗址进行比较来研究不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger? Examining Relationships Between Early-Life Stress, Later-Life Inflammation and Mortality Risk in Skeletal Remains Dietary Variation Among Herculaneum's Victims of Mt. Vesuvius via Dental Microwear Texture Analysis Inter-Observer Processing and Measurement Error Are Low for 2D Dental Measurements on Shared microCT Scans Cover & Editorial Board Outreach inspo, anthropology style. Review of: Cool anthropology: How to engage the public with academic research. By Kristina Baines, Victoria Costa (Eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2022. pp. 270. $32.95/$26.95 (paperback/ebook). ISBN: 9781487524418
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1