The Whys and Wherefores of Reducing Cannabis Use in Early Psychosis: A Qualitative Study of Service Users' Experiences of Quitting and the Support.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2024.2369517
Luke Sheridan Rains, Laura Middleton-Curran, Oliver Mason, Nicola Morant, Sonia Johnson
{"title":"The Whys and Wherefores of Reducing Cannabis Use in Early Psychosis: A Qualitative Study of Service Users<i>'</i> Experiences of Quitting and the Support.","authors":"Luke Sheridan Rains, Laura Middleton-Curran, Oliver Mason, Nicola Morant, Sonia Johnson","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2024.2369517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Cannabis is the most widely used substance among people with recent onset psychosis, but it can have significant negative consequences for long term wellbeing in this cohort. We explored the perspectives of people with recent onset psychosis who used cannabis on their motivations for quitting, their experiences of trying to do so, and their views of the support they had received and the strategies that they had tried. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty one-to-one qualitative interviews were conducted with Early Intervention in Psychosis service users in England who had participated in the CIRCLE trial. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a mix of demographic, cannabis use status, and other characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Quitting cannabis is often very challenging for people and can require making substantial changes in their lives, including to their social relationships, living arrangements, or pathways through work or education. Participants reported wanting help, but often experienced support from mental health services as insubstantial and poorly tailored. Support from peers with relevant lived-experience, where available, was highly valued. Common reasons for quitting included its impact on key life goals or engaging with hobbies, finances, mental health, incompatibility with self-image, and negative use expectancies of intoxication. Concerns regarding mental health were primarily related to psychotic illness, including fear of exacerbating symptoms or experiencing future hospital admissions. <b>Discussion:</b> It is currently unclear how best to support people in this cohort. Interventions that provide support from people with relevant lived experience may be more valued and more clinically effective than current offerings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2024.2369517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cannabis is the most widely used substance among people with recent onset psychosis, but it can have significant negative consequences for long term wellbeing in this cohort. We explored the perspectives of people with recent onset psychosis who used cannabis on their motivations for quitting, their experiences of trying to do so, and their views of the support they had received and the strategies that they had tried. Methods: Twenty one-to-one qualitative interviews were conducted with Early Intervention in Psychosis service users in England who had participated in the CIRCLE trial. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a mix of demographic, cannabis use status, and other characteristics. Results: Quitting cannabis is often very challenging for people and can require making substantial changes in their lives, including to their social relationships, living arrangements, or pathways through work or education. Participants reported wanting help, but often experienced support from mental health services as insubstantial and poorly tailored. Support from peers with relevant lived-experience, where available, was highly valued. Common reasons for quitting included its impact on key life goals or engaging with hobbies, finances, mental health, incompatibility with self-image, and negative use expectancies of intoxication. Concerns regarding mental health were primarily related to psychotic illness, including fear of exacerbating symptoms or experiencing future hospital admissions. Discussion: It is currently unclear how best to support people in this cohort. Interventions that provide support from people with relevant lived experience may be more valued and more clinically effective than current offerings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期精神病患者减少使用大麻的原因和理由:对服务使用者的戒毒经历和支持的定性研究。
目的:大麻是新近发病的精神病患者中使用最广泛的药物,但它会对这一群体的长期健康产生严重的负面影响。我们从使用大麻的新近发病的精神病患者的角度,探讨了他们的戒毒动机、他们尝试戒毒的经历,以及他们对所获得的支持和所尝试的策略的看法。访谈方法我们对英格兰参与 CIRCLE 试验的精神病早期干预服务使用者进行了 20 次一对一定性访谈。访谈采用了有目的的抽样方法,以招募具有不同人口统计学特征、大麻使用状况和其他特征的人员。结果:戒除大麻对人们来说通常非常具有挑战性,可能需要对他们的生活做出重大改变,包括改变他们的社会关系、生活安排或工作或教育途径。参与者表示希望得到帮助,但心理健康服务机构提供的支持往往不够充实且针对性不强。在有相关生活经验的情况下,来自同龄人的支持受到高度重视。戒烟的常见原因包括戒烟对主要生活目标或兴趣爱好的影响、经济、心理健康、与自我形象不符以及对醉酒的负面使用预期。对心理健康的担忧主要与精神病有关,包括担心症状加重或将来入院治疗。讨论:目前尚不清楚如何为这一群体提供最好的支持。与目前的干预措施相比,由具有相关生活经验的人提供支持的干预措施可能更有价值,临床效果也更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
期刊最新文献
The Whys and Wherefores of Reducing Cannabis Use in Early Psychosis: A Qualitative Study of Service Users' Experiences of Quitting and the Support. Reduction of Psychosis Proneness in a Daycare Hospital Program for Patients with Severe Alcohol Use Disorder. Eligibility for Substance Use Clinical Trials Among Emergency Psychiatry Patients: The Impact of Exclusion Criteria. Examining Profiles and Treatment Outcomes in Dual Diagnosis: Comparison of Coordinated Treatment With Mental Health Services Versus Addiction Center Alone. A Real-World Data Analysis. Factors Associated With Increased Substance Use Disorder Care in VA PTSD Specialty Outpatient Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1