Effectiveness of rVSV-ZEBOV vaccination during the 2018-20 Ebola virus disease epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a retrospective test-negative study.

IF 36.4 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00419-5
Sophie Meakin, Justus Nsio, Anton Camacho, Richard Kitenge, Rebecca M Coulborn, Etienne Gignoux, John Johnson, Esther Sterk, Elisabeth Mukamba Musenga, Stephane Hans Bateyi Mustafa, Flavio Finger, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke
{"title":"Effectiveness of rVSV-ZEBOV vaccination during the 2018-20 Ebola virus disease epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a retrospective test-negative study.","authors":"Sophie Meakin, Justus Nsio, Anton Camacho, Richard Kitenge, Rebecca M Coulborn, Etienne Gignoux, John Johnson, Esther Sterk, Elisabeth Mukamba Musenga, Stephane Hans Bateyi Mustafa, Flavio Finger, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00419-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-Zaire Ebola virus (rVSV-ZEBOV) vaccine is the only WHO prequalified vaccine recommended for use to respond to outbreaks of Ebola virus (species Zaire ebolavirus) by WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization. Despite the vaccine's widespread use during several outbreaks, no real-world effectiveness estimates are currently available in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective test-negative analysis to estimate effectiveness of rVSV-ZEBOV vaccination against Ebola virus disease during the 2018-20 epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, using data on suspected Ebola virus disease cases collected from Ebola treatment centres. Those eligible for inclusion had an available Ebola virus RT-PCR result, available key data, were eligible for vaccination during the outbreak, and had symptom onset aligning with the period in which a ring-vaccination protocol was in use. After imputing missing data, each individual confirmed by RT-PCR to be Ebola virus disease-positive (defined as a case) was matched to one individual negative for Ebola virus disease (control) by sex, age, health zone, and month of symptom onset. Effectiveness was estimated from the odds ratio of being vaccinated (≥10 days before symptom onset) versus being unvaccinated among cases and controls, after adjusting for the matching factors. The imputation, matching and effectiveness estimation, was repeated 500 times.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>1273 (4·8%) of 26 438 eligible individuals were positive for Ebola virus disease (cases) and 25 165 (95·2%) were negative (controls). 40 (3·1%) cases and 1271 (5·1%) controls were reported as being vaccinated at least 10 days before symptom onset. After selecting individuals who reported exposure to an individual with Ebola virus disease within the 21 days before symptom onset and matching, the analysis datasets comprised a median of 309 cases and 309 controls. 10 days or more after vaccination, the effectiveness of rVSV-ZEBOV against Ebola virus disease was estimated to be 84% (95% credible interval 70-92).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This analysis is the first to provide estimates of the real-world effectiveness of the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine against Ebola virus disease, amid the widespread use of the vaccine during a large Ebola virus disease outbreak. Our findings confirm that rVSV-ZEBOV is highly protective against Ebola virus disease and support its use during outbreaks, even in challenging contexts such as in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Médecins Sans Frontières.</p><p><strong>Translation: </strong>For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":49923,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1357-1365"},"PeriodicalIF":36.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00419-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-Zaire Ebola virus (rVSV-ZEBOV) vaccine is the only WHO prequalified vaccine recommended for use to respond to outbreaks of Ebola virus (species Zaire ebolavirus) by WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization. Despite the vaccine's widespread use during several outbreaks, no real-world effectiveness estimates are currently available in the literature.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective test-negative analysis to estimate effectiveness of rVSV-ZEBOV vaccination against Ebola virus disease during the 2018-20 epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, using data on suspected Ebola virus disease cases collected from Ebola treatment centres. Those eligible for inclusion had an available Ebola virus RT-PCR result, available key data, were eligible for vaccination during the outbreak, and had symptom onset aligning with the period in which a ring-vaccination protocol was in use. After imputing missing data, each individual confirmed by RT-PCR to be Ebola virus disease-positive (defined as a case) was matched to one individual negative for Ebola virus disease (control) by sex, age, health zone, and month of symptom onset. Effectiveness was estimated from the odds ratio of being vaccinated (≥10 days before symptom onset) versus being unvaccinated among cases and controls, after adjusting for the matching factors. The imputation, matching and effectiveness estimation, was repeated 500 times.

Findings: 1273 (4·8%) of 26 438 eligible individuals were positive for Ebola virus disease (cases) and 25 165 (95·2%) were negative (controls). 40 (3·1%) cases and 1271 (5·1%) controls were reported as being vaccinated at least 10 days before symptom onset. After selecting individuals who reported exposure to an individual with Ebola virus disease within the 21 days before symptom onset and matching, the analysis datasets comprised a median of 309 cases and 309 controls. 10 days or more after vaccination, the effectiveness of rVSV-ZEBOV against Ebola virus disease was estimated to be 84% (95% credible interval 70-92).

Interpretation: This analysis is the first to provide estimates of the real-world effectiveness of the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine against Ebola virus disease, amid the widespread use of the vaccine during a large Ebola virus disease outbreak. Our findings confirm that rVSV-ZEBOV is highly protective against Ebola virus disease and support its use during outbreaks, even in challenging contexts such as in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Funding: Médecins Sans Frontières.

Translation: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2018-20年刚果民主共和国埃博拉病毒病流行期间rVSV-ZEBOV疫苗接种的有效性:一项回顾性阴性试验研究。
背景:重组水泡性口炎病毒-扎伊尔埃博拉病毒(rVSV-ZEBOV)疫苗是世卫组织免疫接种战略咨询专家组建议用于应对埃博拉病毒(扎伊尔埃博拉病毒物种)暴发的唯一通过世卫组织预认证的疫苗。尽管该疫苗在数次疫情爆发中被广泛使用,但目前尚无文献对其实际效果进行评估:我们利用从埃博拉治疗中心收集到的埃博拉病毒病疑似病例数据,进行了一项回顾性试验阴性分析,以估计 2018-20 年刚果民主共和国疫情期间接种 rVSV-ZEBOV 疫苗预防埃博拉病毒病的效果。符合纳入条件的病例具有可用的埃博拉病毒 RT-PCR 结果、可用的关键数据、符合在疫情爆发期间接种疫苗的条件,并且症状出现的时间与使用环状疫苗接种方案的时间一致。在对缺失数据进行估算后,每个经 RT-PCR 证实为埃博拉病毒病阳性的个体(定义为病例)与一个埃博拉病毒病阴性个体(对照)按性别、年龄、卫生区和症状出现月份进行配对。在对匹配因素进行调整后,根据病例和对照组中接种疫苗(症状出现前≥10 天)与未接种疫苗的几率比例估算有效性。估算、匹配和有效性估算重复进行了 500 次:在 26 438 名符合条件的人中,1273 人(4-8%)对埃博拉病毒病呈阳性反应(病例),25 165 人(95-2%)呈阴性反应(对照组)。据报告,40 例(3-1%)病例和 1271 例(5-1%)对照在症状出现前至少 10 天接种过疫苗。在筛选出报告在症状出现前 21 天内接触过埃博拉病毒感染者的个体并进行匹配后,分析数据集的中位数为 309 例病例和 309 例对照。在接种疫苗10天或更长时间后,rVSV-ZEBOV对埃博拉病毒病的有效率估计为84%(95%可信区间为70-92):这项分析首次对rVSV-ZEBOV疫苗预防埃博拉病毒疾病的实际有效性进行了估计,而该疫苗在埃博拉病毒疾病大爆发期间得到了广泛使用。我们的研究结果证实,rVSV-ZEBOV对埃博拉病毒疾病有很强的保护作用,并支持在疫情爆发期间使用该疫苗,即使是在刚果民主共和国东部等具有挑战性的环境中:资助:无国界医生组织:摘要的法文译文见 "补充材料 "部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Infectious Diseases
Lancet Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
60.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
1064
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Infectious Diseases was launched in August, 2001, and is a lively monthly journal of original research, review, opinion, and news covering international issues relevant to clinical infectious diseases specialists worldwide.The infectious diseases journal aims to be a world-leading publication, featuring original research that advocates change or sheds light on clinical practices related to infectious diseases. The journal prioritizes articles with the potential to impact clinical practice or influence perspectives. Content covers a wide range of topics, including anti-infective therapy and immunization, bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections, emerging infectious diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, mycobacterial infections, infection control, infectious diseases epidemiology, neglected tropical diseases, and travel medicine. Informative reviews on any subject linked to infectious diseases and human health are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Correction to Lancet Infect Dis 2024; published online Oct 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00527-9 Effectiveness of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine for seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Uganda: a three-arm, open-label, non-inferiority and superiority, cluster-randomised, controlled trial Expanding seasonal malaria chemoprevention beyond the Sahel region Interim analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine NVX-CoV2601 as a heterologous booster dose Immunogenicity and safety of a monovalent omicron XBB.1.5 SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine as a heterologous booster dose in US adults: interim analysis of a single-arm phase 2/3 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1