Questioning the Correlation Between Incidence of Hirschsprung Disease and Indications for Rectal Biopsy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1089/lap.2023.0534
Go Miyano, Takamasa Suzuki, Risa Masuda, Masaki Ito, Hisae Iida, Kotaro Kaneko, Eri Abe, Michiaki Ikegami, Koki Nikai, Junya Ishii, Geoffrey J Lane, Atsuyuki Yamataka, Tadaharu Okazaki
{"title":"Questioning the Correlation Between Incidence of Hirschsprung Disease and Indications for Rectal Biopsy.","authors":"Go Miyano, Takamasa Suzuki, Risa Masuda, Masaki Ito, Hisae Iida, Kotaro Kaneko, Eri Abe, Michiaki Ikegami, Koki Nikai, Junya Ishii, Geoffrey J Lane, Atsuyuki Yamataka, Tadaharu Okazaki","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Aim:</i></b> To review the indications for rectal mucosal/submucosal biopsy (RMSBx) used for diagnosing Hirschsprung's disease (HD) in pediatric patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The medical records of all children between 1 and 15 years old assessed for chronic constipation between 2012 and 2022 were reviewed. Until the end of 2018, enema usage (E+) was a major indication for RMSBx. In 2019, laxative use for 3 months irrespective of enema use was added as an indication (L+). To determine the relevance of enema usage, L+ was subdivided by enema usage into (L+E+) and (L+E-) groups. The effect of changing the indications for RMSBx on the incidence of HD was investigated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 562 eligible subjects, E+ = 410, L+ = 152; demographics are similar. RMSBx rate in E+ (E+RMSBx) was 36/410 (8.8%) and in L+ (L+RMSBx) was 42/152 (27.6%;) (<i>P</i> < .05). For L+RMSBx, 15/42 were L+E+ and 27/42 were L+E-. HD incidence in E+RMSBx was 8/36 (22.2%; E+HD) and in L+RMSBx was 13/42 (31.0%; L+HD) (<i>p</i> = ns). In L+RMSBx, HD incidence in L+E+ was 5/15 (33.3%; L+E+HD) and in L+E- was 8/27 (29.6%; L+E-HD) (<i>P</i> = ns). Differences in daily bowel motion frequency 6 months postoperatively were not statistically significant; E+HD (1.75/d) versus L+HD (2.03/d) and L+E+HD (1.60/day) versus L+E-HD (2.31/day). Unassisted voluntary defecation was confirmed 12 months postoperatively in 7/8 (87.5%) E+HD, 11/13 (84.6%) L+HD, 4/5 (80.0%) L+E+HD, and 7/8 (87.5%) L-E-HD; differences were not significant. Laxatives were still required in 2/8 (25.0%) E+HD, 3/13 (23.1%) L+HD, in 1/5 (20.0%) in L+E+HD, and 2/8 (25.0%) L+E-HD; differences were not significant. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Incidence of HD was higher in L+HD, but not significantly different suggesting that indications for RMSBx have potential to influence incidence of HD and hint that the incidence of HD could actually be higher. Further assessment of additional indications is warranted to diagnose HD with greater accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"1031-1034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To review the indications for rectal mucosal/submucosal biopsy (RMSBx) used for diagnosing Hirschsprung's disease (HD) in pediatric patients. Methods: The medical records of all children between 1 and 15 years old assessed for chronic constipation between 2012 and 2022 were reviewed. Until the end of 2018, enema usage (E+) was a major indication for RMSBx. In 2019, laxative use for 3 months irrespective of enema use was added as an indication (L+). To determine the relevance of enema usage, L+ was subdivided by enema usage into (L+E+) and (L+E-) groups. The effect of changing the indications for RMSBx on the incidence of HD was investigated. Results: Of 562 eligible subjects, E+ = 410, L+ = 152; demographics are similar. RMSBx rate in E+ (E+RMSBx) was 36/410 (8.8%) and in L+ (L+RMSBx) was 42/152 (27.6%;) (P < .05). For L+RMSBx, 15/42 were L+E+ and 27/42 were L+E-. HD incidence in E+RMSBx was 8/36 (22.2%; E+HD) and in L+RMSBx was 13/42 (31.0%; L+HD) (p = ns). In L+RMSBx, HD incidence in L+E+ was 5/15 (33.3%; L+E+HD) and in L+E- was 8/27 (29.6%; L+E-HD) (P = ns). Differences in daily bowel motion frequency 6 months postoperatively were not statistically significant; E+HD (1.75/d) versus L+HD (2.03/d) and L+E+HD (1.60/day) versus L+E-HD (2.31/day). Unassisted voluntary defecation was confirmed 12 months postoperatively in 7/8 (87.5%) E+HD, 11/13 (84.6%) L+HD, 4/5 (80.0%) L+E+HD, and 7/8 (87.5%) L-E-HD; differences were not significant. Laxatives were still required in 2/8 (25.0%) E+HD, 3/13 (23.1%) L+HD, in 1/5 (20.0%) in L+E+HD, and 2/8 (25.0%) L+E-HD; differences were not significant. Conclusion: Incidence of HD was higher in L+HD, but not significantly different suggesting that indications for RMSBx have potential to influence incidence of HD and hint that the incidence of HD could actually be higher. Further assessment of additional indications is warranted to diagnose HD with greater accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质疑赫氏胃肠病发病率与直肠活检指征之间的相关性
目的:回顾用于诊断儿科赫氏病(HD)的直肠粘膜/粘膜下活检(RMSBx)的适应症。检查方法回顾2012年至2022年期间所有因慢性便秘而接受评估的1至15岁儿童的病历。直到 2018 年底,灌肠使用(E+)一直是 RMSBx 的主要适应症。2019 年,无论是否使用灌肠剂,连续 3 个月使用泻药也被列为一项适应症(L+)。为确定灌肠使用的相关性,L+按灌肠使用情况细分为(L+E+)和(L+E-)两组。研究了改变 RMSBx 适应症对 HD 发病率的影响。结果显示在 562 名符合条件的受试者中,E+ = 410 人,L+ = 152 人;人口统计学特征相似。E+(E+RMSBx)的RMSBx率为36/410(8.8%),L+(L+RMSBx)为42/152(27.6%)(P < .05)。L+RMSBx中,15/42为L+E+,27/42为L+E-。E+RMSBx的HD发生率为8/36(22.2%;E+HD),L+RMSBx为13/42(31.0%;L+HD)(P = ns)。在 L+RMSBx 中,L+E+ 的 HD 发生率为 5/15(33.3%;L+E+HD),L+E- 的 HD 发生率为 8/27(29.6%;L+E-HD)(P = ns)。术后 6 个月每日排便次数的差异无统计学意义;E+HD(1.75/d)对 L+HD(2.03/d),L+E+HD(1.60/天)对 L+E-HD(2.31/天)。术后 12 个月,7/8(87.5%)E+HD、11/13(84.6%)L+HD、4/5(80.0%)L+E+HD 和 7/8(87.5%)L-E-HD 患者确认无辅助自主排便;差异不显著。2/8(25.0%)E+HD、3/13(23.1%)L+HD、1/5(20.0%)L+E+HD 和 2/8(25.0%)L+E-HD 仍需使用泻药;差异无显著性。结论L+HD的HD发生率较高,但差异不显著,这表明RMSBx的适应症有可能影响HD的发生率,并暗示HD的发生率实际上可能更高。有必要进一步评估其他适应症,以便更准确地诊断 HD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Application of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Pringle Maneuver: A Comparative Study with the Pringle Maneuver. Short-Term Efficacy of LCBDE+LC Versus ERCP/EST+LC in the Treatment of Cholelithiasis Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Evaluation of Surgical Results and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approaches in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Analysis. Is Endoscopic Resection Essential for Patients with Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor? Is It Necessary to Endoscopically Evaluate the Anastomosis in Robotic or Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures for Colorectal Cancer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1