Sleep bruxism (SB) may be not associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): A comprehensive assessment employing a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 11.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101994
Bartłomiej Błaszczyk , Marta Waliszewska-Prosół , Mieszko Więckiewicz , Rafał Poręba , Piotr Niemiec , Jakub Przegrałek , Helena Martynowicz
{"title":"Sleep bruxism (SB) may be not associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): A comprehensive assessment employing a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Bartłomiej Błaszczyk ,&nbsp;Marta Waliszewska-Prosół ,&nbsp;Mieszko Więckiewicz ,&nbsp;Rafał Poręba ,&nbsp;Piotr Niemiec ,&nbsp;Jakub Przegrałek ,&nbsp;Helena Martynowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sleep bruxism (SB) are the subject of discussion but have not been confirmed definitively. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the relationship between OSA and SB. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were screened up to February 2024. The risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. 2260 records were identified, but only 14 studies were included. The odds of SB presence in OSA did not differ from the control group (OR: 1.23, 95 % CI: 0.47–3.20). The chance of SB compared to controls also did not differ in mild OSA (OR: 1.56, 95 % CI: 0.76–3.18), in moderate OSA (OR: 1.51, 95 % CI: 0.77–2.94) and in severe OSA (OR: 1.50, 95 % CI: 0.68–3.29). Additionally, the odds of SB were not increased in moderate OSA in comparison to mild OSA (OR: 1.14, 95 % CI: 0.63–2.94), in severe OSA compared to moderate OSA (OR: 1.31, 95 % CI: 0.61–2.79) or in severe OSA compared to mild OSA (OR = 1.42, 95 % CI: 0.69–2.93). The presence of SB in OSA did not differ between genders (OR: 2.14, 95 % CI: 0.65–7.05). The quality of the major studies included is low; therefore, the noted lack of correlation between OSA and SB may require further research. The relationship between OSA and SB seems to be multi-faceted. Presented results should not exempt clinicians from exact diagnosis of concomitant sleep conditions in OSA subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101994"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000984/pdfft?md5=e219d7a506ed1a81ea067c1376d03a41&pid=1-s2.0-S1087079224000984-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000984","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sleep bruxism (SB) are the subject of discussion but have not been confirmed definitively. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the relationship between OSA and SB. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were screened up to February 2024. The risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. 2260 records were identified, but only 14 studies were included. The odds of SB presence in OSA did not differ from the control group (OR: 1.23, 95 % CI: 0.47–3.20). The chance of SB compared to controls also did not differ in mild OSA (OR: 1.56, 95 % CI: 0.76–3.18), in moderate OSA (OR: 1.51, 95 % CI: 0.77–2.94) and in severe OSA (OR: 1.50, 95 % CI: 0.68–3.29). Additionally, the odds of SB were not increased in moderate OSA in comparison to mild OSA (OR: 1.14, 95 % CI: 0.63–2.94), in severe OSA compared to moderate OSA (OR: 1.31, 95 % CI: 0.61–2.79) or in severe OSA compared to mild OSA (OR = 1.42, 95 % CI: 0.69–2.93). The presence of SB in OSA did not differ between genders (OR: 2.14, 95 % CI: 0.65–7.05). The quality of the major studies included is low; therefore, the noted lack of correlation between OSA and SB may require further research. The relationship between OSA and SB seems to be multi-faceted. Presented results should not exempt clinicians from exact diagnosis of concomitant sleep conditions in OSA subjects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠磨牙症(SB)可能与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)无关:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析进行全面评估
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与睡眠磨牙症(SB)之间的关系一直是讨论的主题,但尚未得到明确证实。因此,本荟萃分析旨在研究 OSA 与 SB 之间的关系。本系统综述根据 PRISMA 2020 指南进行。对截至 2024 年 2 月的 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了筛选。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。共找到 2260 条记录,但仅纳入了 14 项研究。OSA 患者出现 SB 的几率与对照组没有差异(OR:1.23,95 % CI:0.47-3.20)。与对照组相比,轻度 OSA(OR:1.56,95 % CI:0.76-3.18)、中度 OSA(OR:1.51,95 % CI:0.77-2.94)和重度 OSA(OR:1.50,95 % CI:0.68-3.29)出现 SB 的几率也没有差异。此外,中度 OSA 与轻度 OSA 相比(OR:1.14,95 % CI:0.63-2.94)、重度 OSA 与中度 OSA 相比(OR:1.31,95 % CI:0.61-2.79)或重度 OSA 与轻度 OSA 相比(OR = 1.42,95 % CI:0.69-2.93),SB 的几率均未增加。OSA 中是否存在 SB 在性别上没有差异(OR:2.14,95 % CI:0.65-7.05)。所纳入的主要研究质量较低;因此,OSA 和 SB 之间缺乏相关性可能需要进一步研究。OSA 和 SB 之间的关系似乎是多方面的。临床医生不应该因为这些结果而放弃对 OSA 患者同时存在的睡眠问题进行准确诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Sleep Medicine Reviews 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels. Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine. The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of self-help cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia. Weighing the evidence for excess weight and weight loss in the management of obstructive sleep apnea.‘Fat’ or fiction? Broken clocks: The effects of delayed school start time on adolescent sleep in solar vs. standard time Novel applications of sleep pharmacology as delirium therapeutics Iatrogenic infection associated with positive airway pressure therapy: A review of precedent, epidemiology, bioaerosols and risk mitigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1