Effect of minimal cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with acute insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.003
{"title":"Effect of minimal cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with acute insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The current literature lacks a clear evaluation of the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) on acute insomnia. Our study aims to address this issue through a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in April 2024 for RCTs comparing patients with clinically significant insomnia symptoms for less than 6 months (ie, acute insomnia) assigned to 1–6 weeks of CBT-I versus no CBT-I.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included four RCTs comprising 327 patients with acute insomnia, of whom 162 (49.5 %) were randomized to CBT-I. CBT-I significantly reduced the Insomnia Severity Index score (MD –5.28; 95 % CI −6.01, −4.56; p &lt; 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 18 %), the incidence of chronic insomnia (MD 0.50; 95 % CI 0.35, 0.70; p &lt; 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %), and the sleep latency (MD -11.04; 95 % CI –18.46, −3.61; p = 0.004; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings provide preliminary evidence that minimal CBT-I may be a feasible and effective preventive measure against chronic insomnia. However, future RCTs and effectiveness trials are necessary to validate, with greater statistical power, the hypothesis that CBT-I can prevent transition from acute to chronic insomnia, given the limited number of studies in our meta-analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The current literature lacks a clear evaluation of the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) on acute insomnia. Our study aims to address this issue through a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).

Method

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in April 2024 for RCTs comparing patients with clinically significant insomnia symptoms for less than 6 months (ie, acute insomnia) assigned to 1–6 weeks of CBT-I versus no CBT-I.

Results

We included four RCTs comprising 327 patients with acute insomnia, of whom 162 (49.5 %) were randomized to CBT-I. CBT-I significantly reduced the Insomnia Severity Index score (MD –5.28; 95 % CI −6.01, −4.56; p < 0.00001; I2 = 18 %), the incidence of chronic insomnia (MD 0.50; 95 % CI 0.35, 0.70; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0 %), and the sleep latency (MD -11.04; 95 % CI –18.46, −3.61; p = 0.004; I2 = 0 %).

Conclusion

These findings provide preliminary evidence that minimal CBT-I may be a feasible and effective preventive measure against chronic insomnia. However, future RCTs and effectiveness trials are necessary to validate, with greater statistical power, the hypothesis that CBT-I can prevent transition from acute to chronic insomnia, given the limited number of studies in our meta-analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最小认知行为疗法对急性失眠患者的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析
目的目前的文献缺乏对失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)对急性失眠症疗效的明确评估。我们的研究旨在通过对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析来解决这一问题。方法我们在 2024 年 4 月系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆的 RCTs,比较了临床症状明显的失眠患者接受 1-6 周 CBT-I 与未接受 CBT-I 治疗的情况。CBT-I 可明显降低失眠严重程度指数得分(MD -5.28; 95 % CI -6.01, -4.56; p < 0.00001; I2 = 18 %)、慢性失眠发生率(MD 0.50; 95 % CI 0.35, 0.70; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0 %)和睡眠潜伏期(MD -11.04; 95 % CI -18.46, -3.61; p = 0.004; I2 = 0 %)。然而,鉴于我们的荟萃分析中的研究数量有限,未来有必要进行研究性临床试验和有效性试验,以更大的统计能力验证 CBT-I 可以预防急性失眠向慢性失眠转变的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
期刊最新文献
Signal detection of drugs associated with obstructive and central sleep apnoea. Sleepless in the Pursuit of perfection: A longitudinal investigation of bidirectional relationships between insomnia and perfectionism in Adolescent males and females. History of symptoms consistent with REM sleep behavior disorder in a population with Parkinson's Disease. Investigation of the influence of 45-minute pre-sleep social media use on sleep quality and memory consolidation in adolescents. Classification of cyclic alternating patterns of sleep using EEG signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1