Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 mimic: An important neurological condition

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123199
{"title":"Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 mimic: An important neurological condition","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>In 2024, the sequalae of the acute phase of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection, which include neurological symptoms and are commonly referred to as long COVID or post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (PASC), continue to be a substantial health concern; however, similar symptoms are observed in individuals with no previous COVID-19 infection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive case series study. Data were obtained from patients who visited our outpatient clinic specializing in PASC between June 1, 2021, and May 31, 2023. We compared antibody test results between patients with confirmed acute phase infection and those without. We compared differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with positive results during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection and positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests (true-PASC), and those with neither (PASC-mimic).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 437 patients diagnosed with PASC according to World Health Organization criteria, 222 underwent COVID-19 antibody tests. Of these, 193 patients (86.9%) had a history of confirmed acute phase infection, whereas 29 (13.1%) did not. Of the former, 186 patients (96.4%) were seropositive for anti-nucleotide SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (true-PASC), whereas 19 of the latter tested seronegative for anti-nucleotide SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (PASC-mimic). There were no significant differences in symptom characteristics between true-PASC and PASC-mimic participants.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It was difficult to identify any clinical features to aid in diagnosing PASC without confirmation of acute COVID-19 infection. The findings indicate the existence of a “PASC-mimic” condition that should be acknowledged and excluded in future PASC-related research studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003344/pdfft?md5=3b11d8e68e0b4667439db827c7b5e392&pid=1-s2.0-S0022510X24003344-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

In 2024, the sequalae of the acute phase of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection, which include neurological symptoms and are commonly referred to as long COVID or post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (PASC), continue to be a substantial health concern; however, similar symptoms are observed in individuals with no previous COVID-19 infection.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive case series study. Data were obtained from patients who visited our outpatient clinic specializing in PASC between June 1, 2021, and May 31, 2023. We compared antibody test results between patients with confirmed acute phase infection and those without. We compared differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with positive results during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection and positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests (true-PASC), and those with neither (PASC-mimic).

Results

Of 437 patients diagnosed with PASC according to World Health Organization criteria, 222 underwent COVID-19 antibody tests. Of these, 193 patients (86.9%) had a history of confirmed acute phase infection, whereas 29 (13.1%) did not. Of the former, 186 patients (96.4%) were seropositive for anti-nucleotide SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (true-PASC), whereas 19 of the latter tested seronegative for anti-nucleotide SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (PASC-mimic). There were no significant differences in symptom characteristics between true-PASC and PASC-mimic participants.

Conclusions

It was difficult to identify any clinical features to aid in diagnosing PASC without confirmation of acute COVID-19 infection. The findings indicate the existence of a “PASC-mimic” condition that should be acknowledged and excluded in future PASC-related research studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模仿 SARS-CoV-2 的急性后遗症:一种重要的神经系统疾病
背景和目标2024年,冠状病毒病-19(COVID-19)感染急性期的后遗症(包括神经系统症状,通常称为长COVID或严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)急性期后遗症(PASC))仍然是一个重大的健康问题;然而,在以前没有感染过COVID-19的人身上也能观察到类似的症状。数据来自 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日期间到我们的 PASC 专科门诊就诊的患者。我们比较了确诊急性期感染和未确诊急性期感染患者的抗体检测结果。我们比较了 COVID-19 感染急性期检测结果呈阳性和抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测结果呈阳性的患者(真性 PASC)与两者均无的患者(模拟 PASC)在人口统计学和临床特征方面的差异。结果在根据世界卫生组织标准确诊为 PASC 的 437 名患者中,有 222 人接受了 COVID-19 抗体检测。其中,193 名患者(86.9%)有确诊的急性期感染病史,29 名患者(13.1%)没有。在前者中,186 名患者(96.4%)的抗核苷酸 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清反应呈阳性(真-PASC),而后者中有 19 名患者的抗核苷酸 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清反应呈阴性(模拟 PASC)。结论 在没有确认急性 COVID-19 感染的情况下,很难找出任何临床特征来帮助诊断 PASC。研究结果表明存在一种 "模仿 PASC "的病症,在未来与 PASC 相关的研究中应认识到并排除这种病症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Importance of focusing on subjective symptoms to maintain quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease for over 5 years. Bridging transdisciplinary in medical education: A pathway to achieve SDG 3 in Global Health. Response to letter from Catamo, Costa, Buque & Nzwalo (2024) titled "Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome" regarding Spencer, Valdes Angues & Palmer's paper titled "Nodding syndrome: A role for environmental biotoxins that dysregulate MECP2 expression?" JNS. 2024;462:123077. Doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123077. Response to the letter “Acute stroke care inequities: Cross-cultural insights and the need for multi-ethnic research” Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1