Célia F. Camara, Alejandra Sel, Carina C.J.M. de Klerk, Paul H.P. Hanel
{"title":"Direct and indirect effects of interpersonal callousness on aggression through empathy and moral disengagement","authors":"Célia F. Camara, Alejandra Sel, Carina C.J.M. de Klerk, Paul H.P. Hanel","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Interpersonal and callous traits in psychopathy have long been recognised as a precursor of antisocial and aggressive behaviour. While these traits commonly describe behaviours attributed to deficient empathy, research has not yet investigated to which extent different facets of empathy mediate the associations between interpersonal callousness and aggression. In the present paper, we seek to address this gap across two studies. In Study 1, we predicted and found that deficiencies in affective empathy, rather than cognitive empathy, were more strongly correlated with interpersonal callousness, and mediated the association of interpersonal callousness with proactive aggression and social deviance. Study 2 replicated these results and further revealed that the mediating effect of affective empathy on proactive aggression was amplified in participants with more tendencies to rationalise and morally disengage from immoral actions. These findings suggest that deficits in affective empathy and moral sensitivity play a more crucial role than cognitive empathy for the association of interpersonal callousness with proactive aggression and social deviance, indicating a critical avenue for targeted interventions aimed at mitigating these effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 112836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924002964/pdfft?md5=bd27878d7235793b30e9b6c80e9e0c5c&pid=1-s2.0-S0191886924002964-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924002964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interpersonal and callous traits in psychopathy have long been recognised as a precursor of antisocial and aggressive behaviour. While these traits commonly describe behaviours attributed to deficient empathy, research has not yet investigated to which extent different facets of empathy mediate the associations between interpersonal callousness and aggression. In the present paper, we seek to address this gap across two studies. In Study 1, we predicted and found that deficiencies in affective empathy, rather than cognitive empathy, were more strongly correlated with interpersonal callousness, and mediated the association of interpersonal callousness with proactive aggression and social deviance. Study 2 replicated these results and further revealed that the mediating effect of affective empathy on proactive aggression was amplified in participants with more tendencies to rationalise and morally disengage from immoral actions. These findings suggest that deficits in affective empathy and moral sensitivity play a more crucial role than cognitive empathy for the association of interpersonal callousness with proactive aggression and social deviance, indicating a critical avenue for targeted interventions aimed at mitigating these effects.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.