Is there a role for acromioplasty and tuberoplasty in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to improve impingement-free range of motion?

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.008
María Brotat-Rodríguez MD, PhD , Juan David Lacouture MD , Riccardo Ranieri MD , Olivier Dhollander MD , Pascal Boileau MD, PhD
{"title":"Is there a role for acromioplasty and tuberoplasty in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to improve impingement-free range of motion?","authors":"María Brotat-Rodríguez MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Juan David Lacouture MD ,&nbsp;Riccardo Ranieri MD ,&nbsp;Olivier Dhollander MD ,&nbsp;Pascal Boileau MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Hypothesis and Background</h3><p>Lateralizing the center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty<span> (RSA) decreases the risk of scapular notching due to inferior impingement but may limit range of motion (ROM) in abduction and forward flexion related to superior acromial impingement. Our primary hypothesis was that, using a 3-dimensional (3D) computer model, a virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) could improve abduction and forward flexion following RSA for cuff tear arthritis (CTA) or massive cuff tear. Our secondary hypothesis was that, based on the virtual planning, a surgical acromioplasty could be performed safely during RSA, without increasing the risk of postoperative acromial fracture.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty seven patients with CTA scheduled for RSA were analyzed with a 3D software and impingement-free ROM was measured. After virtual prosthesis implantation, early acromio-humeral impingement (abduction ≤ 80° or forward flexion ≤ 120°) was observed in 25% of the cases (22/87). A virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) was then performed and glenohumeral ROM was measured again. Based on this 3D planning, a surgical acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) was performed to improve ROM in the vertical plane in these 22 patients with early acromial impingement. Patients were followed with minimum 24 months of follow-up to assess final shoulder ROM and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After virtual acromioplasty alone (n = 11) or acromioplasty with tuberoplasty (n = 11), glenohumeral abduction significantly increased from 75° ± 6.9 before to 89.5° ± 23.4, and forward flexion from 119.3° ± 12 to 135.2° ± 10 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). After surgical acromioplasty/tuberoplasty, the final mean global forward flexion was 148° ± 5 and mean global abduction 150° ± 8 in these patients. At last follow-up, no acromial fracture was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In a 3D model, early acromial impingement may limit abduction (≤80°) or forward flexion (≤120°) after virtual RSA implantation for CTA or massive cuff tear. Virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) shows improved ROM in abduction and flexion. In patients with early impingement, a surgical acromioplasty can be performed safely during RSA, through a deltopectoral approach, without increasing the risk of postoperative acromial fracture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 617-625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypothesis and Background

Lateralizing the center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) decreases the risk of scapular notching due to inferior impingement but may limit range of motion (ROM) in abduction and forward flexion related to superior acromial impingement. Our primary hypothesis was that, using a 3-dimensional (3D) computer model, a virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) could improve abduction and forward flexion following RSA for cuff tear arthritis (CTA) or massive cuff tear. Our secondary hypothesis was that, based on the virtual planning, a surgical acromioplasty could be performed safely during RSA, without increasing the risk of postoperative acromial fracture.

Methods

Eighty seven patients with CTA scheduled for RSA were analyzed with a 3D software and impingement-free ROM was measured. After virtual prosthesis implantation, early acromio-humeral impingement (abduction ≤ 80° or forward flexion ≤ 120°) was observed in 25% of the cases (22/87). A virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) was then performed and glenohumeral ROM was measured again. Based on this 3D planning, a surgical acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) was performed to improve ROM in the vertical plane in these 22 patients with early acromial impingement. Patients were followed with minimum 24 months of follow-up to assess final shoulder ROM and complications.

Results

After virtual acromioplasty alone (n = 11) or acromioplasty with tuberoplasty (n = 11), glenohumeral abduction significantly increased from 75° ± 6.9 before to 89.5° ± 23.4, and forward flexion from 119.3° ± 12 to 135.2° ± 10 (P < .001). After surgical acromioplasty/tuberoplasty, the final mean global forward flexion was 148° ± 5 and mean global abduction 150° ± 8 in these patients. At last follow-up, no acromial fracture was observed.

Conclusion

In a 3D model, early acromial impingement may limit abduction (≤80°) or forward flexion (≤120°) after virtual RSA implantation for CTA or massive cuff tear. Virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) shows improved ROM in abduction and flexion. In patients with early impingement, a surgical acromioplasty can be performed safely during RSA, through a deltopectoral approach, without increasing the risk of postoperative acromial fracture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩峰成形术和肩关节结节成形术在反向肩关节成形术中用于改善无撞击活动范围吗?
假设与背景在反向肩关节置换术(RSA)中将旋转中心偏向一侧可降低由于下肩峰撞击造成肩胛骨切迹的风险,但可能会限制与上肩峰撞击有关的外展和前屈活动范围(ROM)。我们的主要假设是,使用三维(3D)计算机模型,虚拟肩峰成形术(带或不带结节成形术)可改善肩袖撕裂性关节炎(CTA)或肩袖大面积撕裂的RSA术后外展和前屈。我们的次要假设是,根据虚拟规划,手术肩峰成形术可在 RSA 期间安全进行,且不会增加术后肩峰骨折的风险。方法使用三维软件分析了计划进行 RSA 的七名 CTA 患者,并测量了无撞击 ROM。虚拟假体植入后,25%的病例(22/87)观察到了早期肩峰-肱骨撞击(外展≤80°或前屈≤120°)。随后进行了虚拟肩峰成形术(带或不带结节成形术),并再次测量了盂肱关节的活动度。在此三维规划的基础上,对这22名早期肩峰撞击症患者进行了手术肩峰成形术(带或不带结节成形术),以改善垂直面的ROM。结果单纯虚拟肩峰成形术(n = 11)或肩峰成形术加小结节成形术(n = 11)后,盂肱外展从之前的 75° ± 6.9 显著增加到 89.5° ± 23.4,前屈从 119.3° ± 12 增加到 135.2° ± 10(P < .001)。手术肩峰成形术/肘峰成形术后,这些患者的最终平均整体前屈为 148° ± 5,平均整体外展为 150° ± 8。结论 在三维模型中,因 CTA 或肩袖大面积撕裂而植入虚拟 RSA 后,早期肩峰撞击可能会限制外展(≤80°)或前屈(≤120°)。虚拟肩峰成形术(无论有无结节成形术)可改善外展和屈曲的 ROM。对于早期撞击的患者,可通过胸骨下入路,在RSA期间安全地进行肩峰成形术,而不会增加术后肩峰骨折的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using hybrid glenoid fixation with a porous-coated titanium post. Two- to ten-year follow-up of 256 cases with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1