To improve estimates of neotropical forest carbon stocks more direct measurements are needed: An example from the Southwestern Amazon

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122195
{"title":"To improve estimates of neotropical forest carbon stocks more direct measurements are needed: An example from the Southwestern Amazon","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tropical forests play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, storing 40–55 % of terrestrial plant carbon and significantly contributing to primary productivity. However, uncertainties persist in estimating carbon stocks and fluxes, exhibiting variation across the Neotropics, Africa, and Asia tropical forest regions. Despite hosting some of the most densely sampled forests, significant uncertainties persist in biomass and forest carbon stock estimates in the Neotropics. Although the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) forests span over 20 million hectares, no specific biomass or above- and below-ground carbon model has been calibrated for this region thus far. In our study, we conducted direct forest inventories in the SWA to address the following question: Do the allometric patterns, biomass, and carbon stocks observed in the Southwestern Amazon differ from those found in other regions of the Amazon or Pantropical? Our research reveals substantial differences in water and carbon content, biomass stocks, above- and below-ground oven-dry biomass ratios, and allometric patterns between SWA forests and other Amazonian and Pantropical forests. We have demonstrated that these differences result in overestimations of forest biomass when applying allometric equations developed for other Amazonian and Pantropical regions to the open forests of Southwestern Amazonia. This overestimation can reach up to 37 % when using equations from the eastern Amazon, and between 26 % and 46 % depending on the applied Pantropical equation. The use of an inappropriate factor for the root-to-shoot ratio in the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) can lead to overestimates of belowground oven-dry biomass by up to 20 %. To reduce uncertainties related to estimates of forest carbon stock and flux in Neotropical forests, it is necessary to enhance the density of direct biomass measurements, particularly in southwestern Amazonia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical forests play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, storing 40–55 % of terrestrial plant carbon and significantly contributing to primary productivity. However, uncertainties persist in estimating carbon stocks and fluxes, exhibiting variation across the Neotropics, Africa, and Asia tropical forest regions. Despite hosting some of the most densely sampled forests, significant uncertainties persist in biomass and forest carbon stock estimates in the Neotropics. Although the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) forests span over 20 million hectares, no specific biomass or above- and below-ground carbon model has been calibrated for this region thus far. In our study, we conducted direct forest inventories in the SWA to address the following question: Do the allometric patterns, biomass, and carbon stocks observed in the Southwestern Amazon differ from those found in other regions of the Amazon or Pantropical? Our research reveals substantial differences in water and carbon content, biomass stocks, above- and below-ground oven-dry biomass ratios, and allometric patterns between SWA forests and other Amazonian and Pantropical forests. We have demonstrated that these differences result in overestimations of forest biomass when applying allometric equations developed for other Amazonian and Pantropical regions to the open forests of Southwestern Amazonia. This overestimation can reach up to 37 % when using equations from the eastern Amazon, and between 26 % and 46 % depending on the applied Pantropical equation. The use of an inappropriate factor for the root-to-shoot ratio in the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) can lead to overestimates of belowground oven-dry biomass by up to 20 %. To reduce uncertainties related to estimates of forest carbon stock and flux in Neotropical forests, it is necessary to enhance the density of direct biomass measurements, particularly in southwestern Amazonia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为了改进对新热带森林碳储量的估算,需要进行更直接的测量:以亚马逊西南部为例
热带森林在全球碳循环中发挥着至关重要的作用,储存了陆地植物碳的 40-55% 并对初级生产力做出了重大贡献。然而,碳储量和碳通量的估算仍存在不确定性,在新热带、非洲和亚洲热带森林地区表现出差异。尽管新热带地区拥有一些取样最密集的森林,但其生物量和森林碳储量估算仍存在很大的不确定性。尽管亚马逊西南部(SWA)森林面积超过 2000 万公顷,但迄今为止还没有针对该地区的特定生物量或地上地下碳模型进行过校准。在我们的研究中,我们对西南亚马逊地区的森林进行了直接调查,以解决以下问题:在亚马逊西南部观察到的异速模式、生物量和碳储量是否与亚马逊或泛热带其他地区的不同?我们的研究揭示了西南部亚马逊森林与其他亚马逊和泛热带森林在水分和碳含量、生物量储量、地面和地下烘干生物量比率以及异速模式方面的巨大差异。我们已经证明,如果将为其他亚马逊和泛热带地区开发的异计量方程应用到亚马逊西南部的疏林中,这些差异会导致对森林生物量的高估。当使用亚马逊东部地区的方程时,高估率可达 37%,而根据所使用的泛热带方程,高估率在 26% 至 46% 之间。在亚马逊西南部(SWA)使用不恰当的根茎比系数会导致地下烘干生物量的高估达 20%。为了减少与新热带森林碳储量和碳通量估算相关的不确定性,有必要提高直接生物量测量的密度,尤其是在亚马逊西南部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Post-fire management and biocrust development interact in mid-term soil recovery after a wildfire Landscape forest cover and local vegetation structure mediate multitrophic relationships but not the leaf damage in cacao trees Legacy of traditional forest management: The impact of historical charcoal burning on soil biodiversity after centuries Spatial patterns of damage and tree mortality in a selectively logged Atlantic Forest Disentangling the contributions of ecological conditions to biomass in longleaf pine forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1