Efficacy of low-level laser therapy and microsurgery on neurosensory recovery following inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injuries: A systematic review
{"title":"Efficacy of low-level laser therapy and microsurgery on neurosensory recovery following inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injuries: A systematic review","authors":"Gharam Alharbi , Jingade Krishnojirao Dayashankara Rao , Tariq Alnaim , Norah Alzamil , Ramesh nagarajappa","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review evaluates the relative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and microsurgery for neurosensory recovery following sustained iatrogenic injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) more than 6 months in Oral and Maxillofacial surgery procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six articles were included. The mean age of microsurgery studies was 41.5 years and that of LLLT studies was 31.5 with female predominance in all studies. The majority of the included studies have been based on both subjective and objective assessments for neurosensory, two investigating microsurgery and four investigating LLLT following a Six-month post-IAN and LN injury.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Each modality demonstrated positive outcomes in both subjective and objective assessments of neurosensory function. Notably, LLLT exhibited efficacy even when employed beyond a six-month interval following the initial injury. Early intervention is generally recommended, particularly for microsurgical approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>LLLT shows exciting promise as a minimally invasive approach for neurosensory rehabilitation even after six months of injury, while microsurgery studies revealed an improvement and the recommendation for early intervention post-nerve injury, the potential of LLLT and optimize its use for neurosensory rehabilitation, additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods, and blinding protocols are necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"14 5","pages":"Pages 631-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001222/pdfft?md5=6c62f439ada9418ed649cae60882819d&pid=1-s2.0-S2212426824001222-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This systematic review evaluates the relative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and microsurgery for neurosensory recovery following sustained iatrogenic injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) more than 6 months in Oral and Maxillofacial surgery procedures.
Methods
Six articles were included. The mean age of microsurgery studies was 41.5 years and that of LLLT studies was 31.5 with female predominance in all studies. The majority of the included studies have been based on both subjective and objective assessments for neurosensory, two investigating microsurgery and four investigating LLLT following a Six-month post-IAN and LN injury.
Results
Each modality demonstrated positive outcomes in both subjective and objective assessments of neurosensory function. Notably, LLLT exhibited efficacy even when employed beyond a six-month interval following the initial injury. Early intervention is generally recommended, particularly for microsurgical approaches.
Conclusion
LLLT shows exciting promise as a minimally invasive approach for neurosensory rehabilitation even after six months of injury, while microsurgery studies revealed an improvement and the recommendation for early intervention post-nerve injury, the potential of LLLT and optimize its use for neurosensory rehabilitation, additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods, and blinding protocols are necessary.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.