Effects of family caregivers keeping a “Good Things Diary of Caregiving” on mental health, caregiving burden, and positive evaluations of caregiving: A randomized controlled trial

Takeshi Kurinobu , Akitoshi Tomita , Ryo Matsukuma
{"title":"Effects of family caregivers keeping a “Good Things Diary of Caregiving” on mental health, caregiving burden, and positive evaluations of caregiving: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Takeshi Kurinobu ,&nbsp;Akitoshi Tomita ,&nbsp;Ryo Matsukuma","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We explored the impact of writing a “Good Things Diary (GTDiary) of Caregiving” on family caregivers’ mental health and their evaluation of caregiving roles.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We analyzed data from 27 Japanese caregivers for their parents recruited through crowdsourcing. We randomly assigned the participants to one of two groups: the GTDiary of Caregiving group (15 participants) or the Control Diary of Caregiving group (12 participants). We instructed both groups to write a diary for 14 days. Pre- and post-diary questionnaires assessed participants’ well-being, caregiving burden, positive evaluations of caregiving, and stress levels.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed significant improvements in well-being and positive evaluations of caregiving only in the GTDiary of Caregiving group, which had higher well-being and more positive evaluations of caregiving after keeping the diary. However, both groups experienced reductions in caregiving burden and stress.</p></div><div><h3>Limitation</h3><p>Our group of participants included children and stepchildren of caregivers since we made use of crowdsourcing services. Additionally, this study had a mostly male representation among participants, which does not match with the higher occurrence of female family caregivers in Japan. Consequently, the study's participants may not fully reflect the broader population of family caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Writing a caregiving diary helps family caregivers reduce their perceived burden and stress. Focusing on “good things” in caregiving elevates their perception of positive aspects and enhances well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001161/pdfft?md5=1f82936803d27ef840d0d849ee9ccc5f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001161-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We explored the impact of writing a “Good Things Diary (GTDiary) of Caregiving” on family caregivers’ mental health and their evaluation of caregiving roles.

Method

We analyzed data from 27 Japanese caregivers for their parents recruited through crowdsourcing. We randomly assigned the participants to one of two groups: the GTDiary of Caregiving group (15 participants) or the Control Diary of Caregiving group (12 participants). We instructed both groups to write a diary for 14 days. Pre- and post-diary questionnaires assessed participants’ well-being, caregiving burden, positive evaluations of caregiving, and stress levels.

Results

We observed significant improvements in well-being and positive evaluations of caregiving only in the GTDiary of Caregiving group, which had higher well-being and more positive evaluations of caregiving after keeping the diary. However, both groups experienced reductions in caregiving burden and stress.

Limitation

Our group of participants included children and stepchildren of caregivers since we made use of crowdsourcing services. Additionally, this study had a mostly male representation among participants, which does not match with the higher occurrence of female family caregivers in Japan. Consequently, the study's participants may not fully reflect the broader population of family caregivers.

Conclusions

Writing a caregiving diary helps family caregivers reduce their perceived burden and stress. Focusing on “good things” in caregiving elevates their perception of positive aspects and enhances well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭照护者记录 "照护好事日记 "对心理健康、照护负担和照护积极评价的影响:随机对照试验
背景我们探讨了撰写 "护理好日记(GTDiary)"对家庭护理者心理健康和护理角色评估的影响。方法我们分析了通过众包招募的 27 名日本父母护理者的数据。我们将参与者随机分配到两组中的一组:GTD 日记护理组(15 人)或对照护理日记组(12 人)。我们要求这两个小组的参与者写 14 天的日记。结果我们观察到,只有 "照护日记 "对照组在照护幸福感和照护积极评价方面有显著改善,他们在写日记后幸福感更高,对照护的积极评价也更高。局限性由于我们使用了众包服务,因此我们的参与者包括照顾者的子女和继子女。此外,本研究的参与者大多为男性,这与日本女性家庭照顾者较多的情况不符。因此,本研究的参与者可能无法完全反映更广泛的家庭照顾者群体。关注护理工作中的 "好事 "会提升他们对积极方面的感知并增强幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in serum correlate with symptom severity in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study Developing and validating the Sierra Leone perinatal psychological distress scale through an emic-etic approach Examining concurrent and longitudinal associations between quality of interpersonal relations and depressive symptoms among young adults in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1