Unmasking the silent killer: The hidden aggressiveness of signet-ring cell carcinoma in gallbladder cancer.

IF 5.7 4区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Bioscience trends Pub Date : 2024-09-16 Epub Date: 2024-08-25 DOI:10.5582/bst.2024.01230
Zhimeng Cheng, Zilin Jia, Xiaoling Li, Liping Chen, Yulong Cai
{"title":"Unmasking the silent killer: The hidden aggressiveness of signet-ring cell carcinoma in gallbladder cancer.","authors":"Zhimeng Cheng, Zilin Jia, Xiaoling Li, Liping Chen, Yulong Cai","doi":"10.5582/bst.2024.01230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prognostic significance of the signet-ring cell component in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the similarities and differences between gallbladder signet-ring cell carcinoma (GBSRCA) and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) in terms of clinicopathological features and long-term survival. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we analyzed 6,612 patients diagnosed with gallbladder cancer between 2000 and 2021. The cohort included 147 patients with GBSRCA and 6,465 with GBAC. Patients with GBSRCA were significantly younger, with 33.3% being age 60 or younger compared to 23.9% of patients with GBAC (p = 0.009). There was a higher proportion of females in the GBSRCA group (77.6%) compared to the GBAC group (70.1%, p = 0.049). GBSRCA was associated with a more advanced tumor stage (T3-T4: 56.5% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.004), higher rates of lymph node metastasis (43.5% vs. 28.0%, P < 0.001), and poorer differentiation status (poorly to undifferentiated: 80.3% vs. 29.7%, P < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed that patients with GBSRCA had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to patients with GBAC (p < 0.001). GBSRCA was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.001) in the entire cohort, while the T stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with GBSRCA. Even after propensity score matching, patients with GBSRCA still had a poorer prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8957,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience trends","volume":" ","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience trends","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prognostic significance of the signet-ring cell component in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the similarities and differences between gallbladder signet-ring cell carcinoma (GBSRCA) and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) in terms of clinicopathological features and long-term survival. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we analyzed 6,612 patients diagnosed with gallbladder cancer between 2000 and 2021. The cohort included 147 patients with GBSRCA and 6,465 with GBAC. Patients with GBSRCA were significantly younger, with 33.3% being age 60 or younger compared to 23.9% of patients with GBAC (p = 0.009). There was a higher proportion of females in the GBSRCA group (77.6%) compared to the GBAC group (70.1%, p = 0.049). GBSRCA was associated with a more advanced tumor stage (T3-T4: 56.5% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.004), higher rates of lymph node metastasis (43.5% vs. 28.0%, P < 0.001), and poorer differentiation status (poorly to undifferentiated: 80.3% vs. 29.7%, P < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed that patients with GBSRCA had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to patients with GBAC (p < 0.001). GBSRCA was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.001) in the entire cohort, while the T stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with GBSRCA. Even after propensity score matching, patients with GBSRCA still had a poorer prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开无声杀手的面纱:胆囊癌中隐藏的标志环细胞癌的侵袭性。
胆囊癌(GBC)中标志环细胞成分的预后意义尚未得到系统评估。本研究旨在评估胆囊标志环细胞癌(GBSRCA)和胆囊腺癌(GBAC)在临床病理特征和长期生存方面的异同。我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,对 2000 年至 2021 年期间确诊的 6612 名胆囊癌患者进行了分析。其中包括 147 名 GBSRCA 患者和 6465 名 GBAC 患者。GBSRCA患者明显更年轻,33.3%的患者年龄在60岁或以下,而GBAC患者的这一比例为23.9%(P = 0.009)。GBSRCA 组的女性比例(77.6%)高于 GBAC 组(70.1%,p = 0.049)。GBSRCA与更晚的肿瘤分期(T3-T4:56.5% vs. 44.4%,P = 0.004)、更高的淋巴结转移率(43.5% vs. 28.0%,P < 0.001)和更差的分化状态(差分化至未分化:80.3% vs. 29.7%,P < 0.001)有关。生存期分析显示,与GBAC患者相比,GBSRCA患者的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)明显更差(P < 0.001)。在整个队列中,GBSRCA是OS的独立预后因素(P = 0.001),而在GBSRCA患者中,T期和N期是OS和CSS的独立预后因素。即使经过倾向评分匹配,GBSRCA 患者的预后仍然较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BioScience Trends (Print ISSN 1881-7815, Online ISSN 1881-7823) is an international peer-reviewed journal. BioScience Trends devotes to publishing the latest and most exciting advances in scientific research. Articles cover fields of life science such as biochemistry, molecular biology, clinical research, public health, medical care system, and social science in order to encourage cooperation and exchange among scientists and clinical researchers.
期刊最新文献
Ligustrazine alleviates the progression of coronary artery calcification by inhibiting caspase-3/GSDME mediated pyroptosis. How spousal cognitive functioning affects the level of depression in middle-aged and older adults: An instrumental variable study based on CHARLS in China. Financial inclusion and financial gerontology in Japan's aging society. Blocking progression from intervenable mild cognitive impairment to irreversible dementia, what can we do? Exploring the multiple therapeutic mechanisms and challenges of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1