Interval-specific likelihood ratios and probability-based models for interpreting combined CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinica Chimica Acta Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2024.119941
Jonas Dubin , Rik Vandenberghe , Koen Poesen
{"title":"Interval-specific likelihood ratios and probability-based models for interpreting combined CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Jonas Dubin ,&nbsp;Rik Vandenberghe ,&nbsp;Koen Poesen","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2024.119941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis, a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker panel is commonly interpreted with binary cutoff values. However, these values are not generic and do not reflect the disease continuum. We explored the use of interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) and probability-based models for AD using a CSF biomarker panel.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CSF biomarker (Aβ<sub>1-42</sub>, tTau and pTau<sub>181</sub>) data for both a clinical discovery cohort of 241 patients (measured with INNOTEST) and a clinical validation cohort of 129 patients (measured with EUROIMMUN), both including AD and non-AD dementia/cognitive complaints were retrospectively retrieved in a single-center study. Interval-specific LRs for AD were calculated and validated for univariate and combined (Aβ<sub>1-42</sub>/tTau and pTau<sub>181</sub>) biomarkers, and a continuous bivariate probability-based model for AD, plotting Aβ<sub>1-42</sub>/tTau versus pTau<sub>181</sub> was constructed and validated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>LR for AD increased as individual CSF biomarker values deviated from normal. Interval-specific LRs of a combined biomarker model showed that once one biomarker became abnormal, LRs increased even further when another biomarker largely deviated from normal, as replicated in the validation cohort. A bivariate probability-based model predicted AD with a validated accuracy of 88% on a continuous scale.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Interval-specific LRs in a combined biomarker model and prediction of AD using a continuous bivariate biomarker probability-based model, offer a more meaningful interpretation of CSF AD biomarkers on a (semi-)continuous scale with respect to the post-test probability of AD across different assays and cohorts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898124021946/pdfft?md5=05e0ecf9d219f9e140dab945711e40ca&pid=1-s2.0-S0009898124021946-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898124021946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis, a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker panel is commonly interpreted with binary cutoff values. However, these values are not generic and do not reflect the disease continuum. We explored the use of interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) and probability-based models for AD using a CSF biomarker panel.

Methods

CSF biomarker (Aβ1-42, tTau and pTau181) data for both a clinical discovery cohort of 241 patients (measured with INNOTEST) and a clinical validation cohort of 129 patients (measured with EUROIMMUN), both including AD and non-AD dementia/cognitive complaints were retrospectively retrieved in a single-center study. Interval-specific LRs for AD were calculated and validated for univariate and combined (Aβ1-42/tTau and pTau181) biomarkers, and a continuous bivariate probability-based model for AD, plotting Aβ1-42/tTau versus pTau181 was constructed and validated.

Results

LR for AD increased as individual CSF biomarker values deviated from normal. Interval-specific LRs of a combined biomarker model showed that once one biomarker became abnormal, LRs increased even further when another biomarker largely deviated from normal, as replicated in the validation cohort. A bivariate probability-based model predicted AD with a validated accuracy of 88% on a continuous scale.

Conclusions

Interval-specific LRs in a combined biomarker model and prediction of AD using a continuous bivariate biomarker probability-based model, offer a more meaningful interpretation of CSF AD biomarkers on a (semi-)continuous scale with respect to the post-test probability of AD across different assays and cohorts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于解释阿尔茨海默病 CSF 综合生物标记物的特定区间似然比和基于概率的模型。
背景:在阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断中,脑脊液(CSF)生物标记物面板通常以二元截断值来解释。然而,这些值并不是通用的,不能反映疾病的连续性。我们利用脑脊液生物标记物面板探索了使用特定区间似然比(LRs)和基于概率的AD模型:在一项单中心研究中,我们回顾性地检索了241名患者组成的临床发现队列(用INNOTEST测量)和129名患者组成的临床验证队列(用EUROIMMUN测量)的CSF生物标志物(Aβ1-42、tTau和pTau181)数据,其中包括AD和非AD痴呆/认知症状。计算并验证了单变量生物标记物和组合生物标记物(Aβ1-42/tTau 和 pTau181)的AD特异性区间LR,构建并验证了AD连续双变量概率模型,绘制了Aβ1-42/tTau 与 pTau181 的对比图:结果:随着单个 CSF 生物标志物值偏离正常值,AD 的 LR 值也随之增加。综合生物标志物模型的特定区间LRs显示,一旦一个生物标志物出现异常,当另一个生物标志物在很大程度上偏离正常值时,LRs会进一步增加,这在验证队列中得到了验证。基于二元概率的模型预测AD的验证准确率为88%:综合生物标志物模型中的特异性区间LRs,以及使用连续的基于生物标志物概率的双变量模型预测AD,为CSF AD生物标志物在(半)连续尺度上对不同检测方法和队列的AD检测后概率提供了更有意义的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Chimica Acta
Clinica Chimica Acta 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
1268
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells. The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Long non-coding RNAs in pancreatic cancer. Navigating liver health with metabolomics: A comprehensive review. Comprehensive evaluation of the impact of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) on the fragmentomic characteristics of plasma cell-free DNA. Prevalence and heterogeneity of antinuclear antibody patterns in adult Italian patients with autoimmune liver diseases: Our experience. The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1