Background and aims: Diabetes mellitus (DM) accelerates the onset and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD), yet metabolomic profiling in individuals with both conditions remains limited. NMR-based metabolomics offers a comprehensive assessment of metabolic alterations and may improve cardiovascular risk stratification. Hence, the objective of this study was to characterize serum metabolic signatures associated with varying CAD severity in diabetic patients and evaluate their relationship with conventional clinical measures.
Methods: Eighty-eight diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography were categorized into three groups: normal coronaries (DNC), chronic stable angina (DCSA), and myocardial infarction (DMI). Serum was mechanically filtered (3-kDa cutoff) and analyzed using 800 MHz 1H NMR spectroscopy. Spectral data underwent univariate ANOVA, PCA, PLS-DA, and OPLS-DA. Metabolites with VIP > 1.0 were identified. ROC and regression analyses assessed discriminative performance and clinical-metabolic associations.
Results: Multivariate analyses showed clear separation among DNC, DCSA, and DMI. Seventeen metabolites distinguished the groups, with aspartate, methylguanidine, arginine, and creatinine identified as key metabolic signatures. Clinical measures-Troponin I, LDL, LDH, and total cholesterol-also demonstrated strong discriminatory ability. Combined ROC models achieved high sensitivity and specificity. Significant correlations linked myocardial injury and lipid dysregulation with nitrogen- and amino-acid-related metabolites.
Conclusions: Filtered-serum 1H NMR metabolomics reliably differentiates CAD severity in diabetic patients, revealing metabolic signatures associated with oxidative stress, amino-acid disruption, and lipid imbalance. Integrating metabolic and clinical measures offers a promising precision-medicine approach for early detection and risk stratification in DM-related CAD.
Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease, and blood glucose monitoring is crucial for its management. Glycated albumin (GA) is a product of non-enzymatic glycation of glucose with human serum albumin (HSA) in the blood and can reflect the average blood glucose levels over the past 2-3 weeks. It compensates for the limitations of glycated hemoglobin (HbA₁c) in short-term blood glucose monitoring and in special populations such as those with hemoglobin disorders. However, there are various methods for detecting GA, including chemical colorimetry, boronate affinity chromatography, immunoassays, enzymatic methods, and mass spectrometry. Traditional detection methods have been replaced by enzyme-based test kits using fully automated biochemical analyzers due to their lack of traceability and cumbersome operation and enzymatic methods have thus become the most commonly used method for clinical GA detection. However, the lack of standardized reference measurement procedures leads to significant variations in detection results among different enzymatic assay kits, making the standardization of GA detection particularly critical. This review summarizes the early detection methods, clinically common enzymatic assays, and standardized liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods to elaborate on the development of GA detection methods. Further analyzes the current status and existing challenges of GA detection standardization, aiming to improve the consistency of results among different detection methods and promote the advancement of GA detection standardization.
Objectives: Phosphatases are pivotal in regulating phosphorylation homeostasis by catalyzing biomolecular dephosphorylation, thereby modulating signaling pathways, metabolic networks, and cellular functions. Dysregulation of phosphatase activity is implicated in diverse pathologies, including hepatobiliary dysfunction, metabolic bone disorders, prostate cancer, and lysosomal storage syndromes. This review aims to critically evaluate optical biosensing strategies for phosphatase detection, with emphasis on isoform-specific diagnostics and clinical applicability.
Methods: A comprehensive analysis was conducted on emerging optical biosensing platforms, including nanomaterial-assisted colorimetric assays, ratiometric fluorescence sensors, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). These modalities were assessed against key clinical criteria such as sensitivity, isoform specificity, multiplexing capability, and regulatory feasibility.
Results: Optical biosensors demonstrate significant advancements over conventional p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP)-based assays, offering enhanced sensitivity, substrate stability, and isoform discrimination. Specific applications include detection of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) in oncology, lysosomal acid phosphatase in neurodegenerative conditions, and alkaline phosphatase in bone and liver pathologies. These platforms show promise for integration into theragnostic systems and digital health infrastructures.
Conclusions: Optical biosensing technologies represent a transformative approach to phosphatase detection, enabling real-time monitoring and predictive analytics in precision diagnostics. Their integration into clinical workflows could facilitate early disease detection, personalized treatment strategies, and improved patient outcomes.
Background: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome and end-stage renal disease, but the gold-standard diagnostic method is invasive. This study aims to develop a non-invasive diagnostic model for IMN, focus on the diagnostic value of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody (anti-PLA2R-Ab).
Patients and methods: In this single-center retrospective study,we included 9524 patients with chronic kidney disease patients who received renal biopsies, extracted 139 clinicopathological data from their records, and divided them into two groups based on pathological results.Renal biopsy cases were collected to form an independent external validation cohort.Seven machine learning methods were used to develop and verify models, and anti-PLA2R-Ab data were used to optimize and evaluate these models. Seventy percent of the patients were used for training, and the other 30% for verification. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, F1-score, accuracy, and confusion matrix were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the models.
Results: We analyzed 8840 patients and 10 indicators, excluding anti-PLA2R-Ab, to develop and validate diagnostic models, and then analyzed 2457 patients and 6 indicators, including anti-PLA2R-Ab, to develop and validate optimized models. With or without anti-PLA2R-Ab, the CatBoost model provided more accurate diagnosis of IMN (internal vs. external verification AUC:0.921 vs.0.901 and 0.950 vs.0.904, respectively) than anti-PLA2R-Ab alone (AUC: 0.867).
Conclusion: The CatBoost model was an accurate and non-invasive method that provided better diagnosis of IMN than anti-PLA2R-Ab in Chinese patients. This model is especially when anti-PLA2R-Ab testing and kidney biopsy are difficult or impossible.
Objectives: Detection of antinuclear antibody (ANA) via indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells is a screening test for the serological diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Automated interpretation of ANA classification by novel artificial intelligence (AI)-aided pattern recognition was compared with expert reading under routine conditions.
Methods: Consecutive serum samples of 2671 individuals referred to a routine laboratory were analysed for ANA titers and patterns using the automated interpretation system akironNeo. AI-based ANA detection was compared with independent classification by two experienced immunologists according to the international consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP) competence level.
Results: Overall, a good agreement (κ > 0.60) between the different evaluators both for positive/negative classification of ANA fluorescence images as well as for the pattern classification of positive samples with a titer ≥ 1:320 was observed. Positive/negative differentiation at different cut-offs revealed κ values from 0.584 to 0.760 whereas corresponding pattern recognition for interphase, metaphase and cytoplasmic patterns demonstrated κ values from 0.560 to 0.736 for samples scored as positive by all three evaluators.
Conclusions: The AI-based software showed a similar performance compared to human observers. AI-aided ANA image analysis can facilitate the diagnostic workflow of ANA IIF assays and reduce subjectivity during image classification.
Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is recommended to screen people living with HIV (PLWH) for tuberculosis (TB). LumiraDx is a portable platform that uses fingerprick blood. How CRP compares in fingerprick blood and serum is unknown.
Methods: CRP was measured in 1034 consecutively recruited contacts of people with TB using fresh fingerprick blood (LumiraDx at point-of-care) and stored (-80 °C) serum [LumiraDx and cobas C-Reactive Protein (Latex) High Sensitive (CRPHS) in laboratories]. Agreement was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Passing-Bablok (PB) regression, and Bland-Altman (BA) plots. Sensitivity and specificity for TB were evaluated in 156 contacts with microbiological reference standard information, namely culture, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, or both.
Results: Strong agreement [CCC = 0.85, PB slope -0.27 (95% confidence interval -0.82, 0.2), BA mean difference 1 (-1,3)] was observed between LumiraDx on fingerprick blood and serum. Similar agreement occurred for serum CRPHS vs. LumiraDx on serum [0.79; 1.1 (-1.1, 2.3); 11 (9, 14)] or fingerprick blood [0.75; 1.3 (-0.6, 2.5); 10 (8, 13)]. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were 0.747 (0.595, 0.899) for fingerprick LumiraDx, 0.761 (0.628, 0.893) for serum LumiraDx and 0.775 (0.636, 0.914) for serum CRPHS. At >5 mg/L, all tests showed identical sensitivity [77% (70, 83)]. Specificities were 60% (53, 68), 64% (57, 72) and 50% (43, 58), respectively. Serum storage duration did not affect performance.
Conclusions: LumiraDx CRP readouts on fingerprick blood and serum correlate closely. Stored serum can be used for LumiraDx CRP measurement. High sensitivity methods increase the proportion of people who screen false-positive.

