Quantitative support for the benefits of proactive management for wildlife disease control.

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1111/cobi.14363
Molly C Bletz, Evan H Campbell Grant, Graziella DiRenzo
{"title":"Quantitative support for the benefits of proactive management for wildlife disease control.","authors":"Molly C Bletz, Evan H Campbell Grant, Graziella DiRenzo","doi":"10.1111/cobi.14363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Finding effective pathogen mitigation strategies is one of the biggest challenges humans face today. In the context of wildlife, emerging infectious diseases have repeatedly caused widespread host morbidity and population declines of numerous taxa. In areas yet unaffected by a pathogen, a proactive management approach has the potential to minimize or prevent host mortality. However, typically critical information on disease dynamics in a novel host system is lacking, empirical evidence on efficacy of management interventions is limited, and there is a lack of validated predictive models. As such, quantitative support for identifying effective management interventions is largely absent, and the opportunity for proactive management is often missed. We considered the potential invasion of the chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal), whose expected emergence in North America poses a severe threat to hundreds of salamander species in this global salamander biodiversity hotspot. We developed and parameterized a dynamic multistate occupancy model to forecast host and pathogen occurrence, following expected emergence of the pathogen, and evaluated the response of salamander populations to different management scenarios. Our model forecasted that taking no action is expected to be catastrophic to salamander populations. Proactive action was predicted to maximize host occupancy outcomes relative to wait-and-see reactive management, thus providing quantitative support for proactive management opportunities. The eradication of Bsal was unlikely under all the evaluated management options. Contrary to our expectations, even early pathogen detection had little effect on Bsal or host occupancy outcomes. Our results provide quantitative support that proactive management is the optimal strategy for promoting persistence of disease-threatened salamander populations. Our approach fills a critical gap by defining a framework for evaluating management options prior to pathogen invasion and can thus serve as a template for addressing novel disease threats that jeopardize wildlife and human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14363","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding effective pathogen mitigation strategies is one of the biggest challenges humans face today. In the context of wildlife, emerging infectious diseases have repeatedly caused widespread host morbidity and population declines of numerous taxa. In areas yet unaffected by a pathogen, a proactive management approach has the potential to minimize or prevent host mortality. However, typically critical information on disease dynamics in a novel host system is lacking, empirical evidence on efficacy of management interventions is limited, and there is a lack of validated predictive models. As such, quantitative support for identifying effective management interventions is largely absent, and the opportunity for proactive management is often missed. We considered the potential invasion of the chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal), whose expected emergence in North America poses a severe threat to hundreds of salamander species in this global salamander biodiversity hotspot. We developed and parameterized a dynamic multistate occupancy model to forecast host and pathogen occurrence, following expected emergence of the pathogen, and evaluated the response of salamander populations to different management scenarios. Our model forecasted that taking no action is expected to be catastrophic to salamander populations. Proactive action was predicted to maximize host occupancy outcomes relative to wait-and-see reactive management, thus providing quantitative support for proactive management opportunities. The eradication of Bsal was unlikely under all the evaluated management options. Contrary to our expectations, even early pathogen detection had little effect on Bsal or host occupancy outcomes. Our results provide quantitative support that proactive management is the optimal strategy for promoting persistence of disease-threatened salamander populations. Our approach fills a critical gap by defining a framework for evaluating management options prior to pathogen invasion and can thus serve as a template for addressing novel disease threats that jeopardize wildlife and human health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为野生动物疾病控制主动管理的益处提供量化支持。
寻找有效的病原体缓解策略是当今人类面临的最大挑战之一。就野生动物而言,新出现的传染病已多次造成宿主大面积发病和众多类群数量下降。在尚未受到病原体影响的地区,积极的管理方法有可能最大限度地减少或防止宿主死亡。然而,在新的寄主系统中,通常缺乏有关疾病动态的关键信息,有关管理干预措施效果的经验证据也很有限,而且缺乏经过验证的预测模型。因此,确定有效管理干预措施的定量支持在很大程度上是缺失的,主动管理的机会往往被错过。我们考虑了蝾螈糜烂真菌 Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans(Bsal)的潜在入侵,预计其在北美的出现将对这一全球蝾螈生物多样性热点地区的数百种蝾螈物种构成严重威胁。我们开发了一个动态多州占位模型并将其参数化,以预测病原体预计出现后宿主和病原体的发生情况,并评估了大鲵种群对不同管理方案的反应。我们的模型预测,如果不采取任何行动,预计将对大鲵种群造成灾难性影响。据预测,相对于静观其变的被动管理,积极主动的行动能最大限度地提高宿主占有率,从而为积极主动的管理机会提供量化支持。在所有评估的管理方案中,根除 Bsal 的可能性都不大。与我们的预期相反,即使是早期病原体检测对 Bsal 或宿主占用结果的影响也很小。我们的研究结果提供了定量支持,即主动管理是促进受疾病威胁的大鲵种群持续生存的最佳策略。我们的方法填补了一个重要空白,确定了在病原体入侵之前评估管理方案的框架,因此可以作为应对危害野生动物和人类健康的新型疾病威胁的模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
期刊最新文献
Misrepresentation of invasive species in the mass media with images of unrelated organisms Eliciting diverse perspectives to prioritize community actions for biodiversity conservation Show me the theory: Response to Birdsong et al. (2024) Systematic conservation prioritization with the prioritizr R package Impacts of ecosystem service message framing and dynamic social norms on public support for tropical forest restoration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1