Effects of intermittent calorie restriction in non-diabetic patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.051
Han Ah Lee, Hyeyoung Moon, Yuri Kim, Jeong Kyong Lee, Hye Ah Lee, Hwi Young Kim
{"title":"Effects of intermittent calorie restriction in non-diabetic patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.","authors":"Han Ah Lee, Hyeyoung Moon, Yuri Kim, Jeong Kyong Lee, Hye Ah Lee, Hwi Young Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>We compared the effects of a 12-week intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) and standard of care (SOC) diet on liver fat content (LFC) in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial included patients with MRI-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) ≥8%. Patients were randomly assigned to the ICR (5:2 diet) or SOC (80% of the recommended calorie intake) groups and stratified according to the body mass index (≥ or <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a relative LFC reduction as measured by MRI-PDFF ≥30%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two participants underwent randomization (36 patients with and 36 without obesity), and 63 (34 patients with and 29 without obesity) completed the trial. At week 12, a higher proportion of patients in the ICR arm achieved a relative LFC reduction of ≥30% compared to the SOC arm (72.2% vs. 44.4%; P=0.033), which was more prominent in the group with obesity (61.1% vs. 27.7%; P=0.033) than in the group without obesity (83.3% vs. 61.1%; P=0.352). The relative weight reduction was insignificant between the ICR and SOC arms (-5.3% vs. -4.2%; P=0.273); however, it was higher in the ICR arm compared to the SOC arm (-5.5% vs. -2.9%; P=0.039) in the group with obesity. Changes in fibrosis, muscle and fat mass, and liver enzyme levels were similar between the two groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ICR diet reduced LFC more effectively than SOC in patients with MASLD, particularly in patients with obesity. Additional studies are warranted in larger and more diverse cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: We compared the effects of a 12-week intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) and standard of care (SOC) diet on liver fat content (LFC) in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial included patients with MRI-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) ≥8%. Patients were randomly assigned to the ICR (5:2 diet) or SOC (80% of the recommended calorie intake) groups and stratified according to the body mass index (≥ or <25 kg/m2). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a relative LFC reduction as measured by MRI-PDFF ≥30%.

Results: Seventy-two participants underwent randomization (36 patients with and 36 without obesity), and 63 (34 patients with and 29 without obesity) completed the trial. At week 12, a higher proportion of patients in the ICR arm achieved a relative LFC reduction of ≥30% compared to the SOC arm (72.2% vs. 44.4%; P=0.033), which was more prominent in the group with obesity (61.1% vs. 27.7%; P=0.033) than in the group without obesity (83.3% vs. 61.1%; P=0.352). The relative weight reduction was insignificant between the ICR and SOC arms (-5.3% vs. -4.2%; P=0.273); however, it was higher in the ICR arm compared to the SOC arm (-5.5% vs. -2.9%; P=0.039) in the group with obesity. Changes in fibrosis, muscle and fat mass, and liver enzyme levels were similar between the two groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusions: The ICR diet reduced LFC more effectively than SOC in patients with MASLD, particularly in patients with obesity. Additional studies are warranted in larger and more diverse cohorts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间歇性卡路里限制对患有代谢功能障碍相关脂肪肝的非糖尿病患者的影响。
背景与目的:我们比较了为期12周的间歇性卡路里限制(ICR)和标准护理(SOC)饮食对代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)患者肝脏脂肪含量(LFC)的影响:这项随机对照试验包括核磁共振质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)≥8%的患者。患者被随机分配到ICR(5:2饮食)或SOC(推荐卡路里摄入量的80%)组,并根据体重指数(≥或2)进行分层。主要结果是通过 MRI-PDFF 测定 LFC 相对减少≥30%的患者比例:72名参与者接受了随机分组(36名肥胖症患者和36名非肥胖症患者),63名参与者(34名肥胖症患者和29名非肥胖症患者)完成了试验。第12周时,与SOC治疗组相比,ICR治疗组有更高比例的患者实现了LFC相对降幅≥30%(72.2% vs. 44.4%; P=0.033),其中肥胖组(61.1% vs. 27.7%; P=0.033)比无肥胖组(83.3% vs. 61.1%; P=0.352)更为显著。在肥胖组中,ICR治疗组和SOC治疗组的相对体重减轻不显著(-5.3% vs. -4.2%;P=0.273);但在肥胖组中,ICR治疗组的相对体重减轻高于SOC治疗组(-5.5% vs. -2.9%;P=0.039)。两组的纤维化、肌肉和脂肪质量以及肝酶水平的变化相似(P均大于0.05):结论:ICR 饮食比 SOC 更能有效减少 MASLD 患者的 LFC,尤其是肥胖患者。有必要在更大规模和更多样化的队列中进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
The association between obesity and malignant progression of Barrett's Esophagus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Correction. NORTH AMERICAN EXPERT CONSENSUS ON THE POST-PROCEDURAL CARE OF PATIENTS AFTER PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY USING A DELPHI PROCESS. Accuracy of Computer-aided Diagnosis in Colonoscopy Varies according to Polyp Location. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Alcohol Rehabilitation Within 3 Months after Alcohol Hepatitis and Survival - A National Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1