Alignment of contraception use with the ACR reproductive health guidelines in women with systemic lupus erythematosus within the RISE registry.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Lupus Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1136/lupus-2024-001192
Megan E B Clowse, Jing Li, Amanda Snyderman, Gabriela Schmajuk
{"title":"Alignment of contraception use with the ACR reproductive health guidelines in women with systemic lupus erythematosus within the RISE registry.","authors":"Megan E B Clowse, Jing Li, Amanda Snyderman, Gabriela Schmajuk","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Contraception is crucial for safely timing pregnancies in patients with SLE. This study investigated predictors of contraception documentation in patients with SLE, and the alignment of contraception practices with the 2020 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines, within the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Female patients (aged 18-44 years) with SLE were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 coding within the RISE registry, which includes data from rheumatology clinics across the USA. Eligible patients were required to have ≥1 clinical visit in 2019 (prepandemic) or between 1 April 2020 and 30 March 2021 (mid-pandemic). Adjusted multilevel logistic modelling assessed patient, provider and practice characteristics for associations with contraception documentation. Contraception patterns were identified and compared with the 2020 ACR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contraception documentation rates were similar in the prepandemic and mid-pandemic groups (8.1% and 8.5%, respectively). Higher documentation rates were found in women who were younger, White, and had more visits, as well as those seen within a health system, by a female provider, and within specific regions and electronic health record (EHR) systems. Prescription of a teratogenic medication did not influence contraception documentation or type. Oestrogen-containing contraceptives were prescribed less often to women at high risk for thrombosis (26.2% with thrombotic risk vs 60.6% without, p<0.0001) and history of lupus nephritis (LN) (53.8% with history of LN vs 63.2% without, p=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practices participating in the RISE registry do not currently record contraception in the large majority of women with SLE, although increased documentation in some EHRs suggests that system changes may improve rates of documentation. Women at higher risk for thrombosis were less likely to receive oestrogen, suggesting that warnings against oestrogen use has impacted contraception prescription, although the limited documentation and limited contraception among women taking teratogenic medications suggest a high unmet need.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Contraception is crucial for safely timing pregnancies in patients with SLE. This study investigated predictors of contraception documentation in patients with SLE, and the alignment of contraception practices with the 2020 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines, within the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry.

Materials and methods: Female patients (aged 18-44 years) with SLE were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 coding within the RISE registry, which includes data from rheumatology clinics across the USA. Eligible patients were required to have ≥1 clinical visit in 2019 (prepandemic) or between 1 April 2020 and 30 March 2021 (mid-pandemic). Adjusted multilevel logistic modelling assessed patient, provider and practice characteristics for associations with contraception documentation. Contraception patterns were identified and compared with the 2020 ACR guidelines.

Results: Contraception documentation rates were similar in the prepandemic and mid-pandemic groups (8.1% and 8.5%, respectively). Higher documentation rates were found in women who were younger, White, and had more visits, as well as those seen within a health system, by a female provider, and within specific regions and electronic health record (EHR) systems. Prescription of a teratogenic medication did not influence contraception documentation or type. Oestrogen-containing contraceptives were prescribed less often to women at high risk for thrombosis (26.2% with thrombotic risk vs 60.6% without, p<0.0001) and history of lupus nephritis (LN) (53.8% with history of LN vs 63.2% without, p=0.024).

Conclusions: Practices participating in the RISE registry do not currently record contraception in the large majority of women with SLE, although increased documentation in some EHRs suggests that system changes may improve rates of documentation. Women at higher risk for thrombosis were less likely to receive oestrogen, suggesting that warnings against oestrogen use has impacted contraception prescription, although the limited documentation and limited contraception among women taking teratogenic medications suggest a high unmet need.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 RISE 登记册中,系统性红斑狼疮女性患者的避孕措施使用情况与 ACR 生殖健康指南保持一致。
目的:避孕对于系统性红斑狼疮患者安全把握怀孕时机至关重要。本研究调查了系统性红斑狼疮患者避孕记录的预测因素,以及在风湿病学疗效信息系统(RISE)登记中,避孕措施与2020年美国风湿病学会(ACR)指南的一致性:通过 RISE 登记系统中的国际疾病分类 (ICD)-9/ICD-10 编码确定系统性红斑狼疮女性患者(18-44 岁),该登记系统包括来自美国各地风湿病诊所的数据。符合条件的患者必须在2019年(流行前期)或2020年4月1日至2021年3月30日(流行中期)期间进行过≥1次临床就诊。调整后的多层次逻辑模型评估了患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗机构的特征与避孕记录的关联。确定了避孕模式,并与 2020 年 ACR 指南进行了比较:大流行前组和大流行中期组的避孕记录率相似(分别为 8.1% 和 8.5%)。更年轻、更白、就诊次数更多的妇女,以及在医疗系统内就诊、由女性医疗服务提供者提供服务、在特定地区和电子健康记录 (EHR) 系统内就诊的妇女的记录率更高。处方致畸药物并不影响避孕文件或类型。给血栓风险高的妇女开具含雌激素避孕药的情况较少(有血栓风险的妇女占 26.2%,无血栓风险的妇女占 60.6%,P=0):参与 RISE 登记的医疗机构目前并未记录大部分系统性红斑狼疮女性患者的避孕情况,尽管一些电子病历中记录的情况有所增加,这表明系统的改变可能会提高记录率。血栓风险较高的女性接受雌激素的可能性较低,这表明禁止使用雌激素的警告对避孕处方产生了影响,尽管有限的记录和服用致畸药物的女性中有限的避孕措施表明仍有大量需求未得到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. Using photovoice to investigate patient experiences of lupus nephritis in Canada. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on pregnancy outcome in patients with SLE: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Improving routine mental health screening for depression and anxiety in a paediatric lupus clinic: a quality improvement initiative for enhanced mental healthcare. Validating claims-based algorithms for a systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis in Medicare data for informed use of the Lupus Index: a tool for geospatial research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1