Clinical cut-off scores for the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children to differentiate among adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder, other psychopathology, and no psychopathology: a replication study.
{"title":"Clinical cut-off scores for the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children to differentiate among adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder, other psychopathology, and no psychopathology: a replication study.","authors":"Tess Gecha, Veronica McLaren, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.1186/s40479-024-00264-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite being one of the most popular measures of borderline pathology in adolescents, only one study has evaluated clinical cut-off scores for the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children (BPFS-C) using a small sample without a healthy comparison group (Chang B, Sharp C, Ha C. The Criterion Validity of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children in an Adolescent Inpatient Setting. J Personal Disord. 2011;25(4):492-503. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.492 .). The purpose of the current study was to replicate and improve on the limitations of the prior study conducted by Chang et al. to more definitively establish clinical cut-off scores for the self- and parent-report versions of the BPFS-C to detect clinical and sub-clinical borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a large sample of adolescents with BPD, other psychopathology, and no psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 900 adolescents ranging from ages 12-17 participated in this study. The clinical sample consisted of 622 adolescents recruited from an inpatient psychiatric facility, and the healthy control sample consisted of 278 adolescents recruited from the community. All participants completed the BPFS-C and were administered the Child Interview for DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (CI-BPD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using three-way ROC analyses, cut-off scores on the self- and parent-report versions of the BPFS-C distinguishing adolescents with BPD from those with subclinical BPD, and those with subclinical BPD from healthy adolescents were established.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the use of both versions of the BPFS-C to detect adolescents with BPD and sub-clinical BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48586,"journal":{"name":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","volume":"11 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-024-00264-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite being one of the most popular measures of borderline pathology in adolescents, only one study has evaluated clinical cut-off scores for the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children (BPFS-C) using a small sample without a healthy comparison group (Chang B, Sharp C, Ha C. The Criterion Validity of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children in an Adolescent Inpatient Setting. J Personal Disord. 2011;25(4):492-503. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.492 .). The purpose of the current study was to replicate and improve on the limitations of the prior study conducted by Chang et al. to more definitively establish clinical cut-off scores for the self- and parent-report versions of the BPFS-C to detect clinical and sub-clinical borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a large sample of adolescents with BPD, other psychopathology, and no psychopathology.
Methods: A total of 900 adolescents ranging from ages 12-17 participated in this study. The clinical sample consisted of 622 adolescents recruited from an inpatient psychiatric facility, and the healthy control sample consisted of 278 adolescents recruited from the community. All participants completed the BPFS-C and were administered the Child Interview for DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (CI-BPD).
Results: Using three-way ROC analyses, cut-off scores on the self- and parent-report versions of the BPFS-C distinguishing adolescents with BPD from those with subclinical BPD, and those with subclinical BPD from healthy adolescents were established.
Conclusions: These findings support the use of both versions of the BPFS-C to detect adolescents with BPD and sub-clinical BPD.
背景:尽管儿童边缘型人格特征量表(Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children,BPFS-C)是最常用的青少年边缘型病理学测量方法之一,但只有一项研究在没有健康对比组的情况下,使用小样本对其临床临界分数进行了评估(Chang B, Sharp C, Ha C. The Criterion Validity of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children in an Adolescent Inpatient Setting.J Personal Disord.2011;25(4):492-503. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.492 .).本研究旨在复制Chang等人之前的研究,并改进其局限性,以更明确地确定BPFS-C自我报告版和家长报告版的临床临界分数,从而在具有边缘型人格障碍、其他精神病理学或无精神病理学的青少年大样本中检测出临床和亚临床边缘型人格障碍(BPD):共有 900 名 12-17 岁的青少年参与了这项研究。临床样本包括622名从精神病住院机构招募的青少年,健康对照样本包括278名从社区招募的青少年。所有参与者都填写了BPFS-C,并接受了DSM-IV边缘型人格障碍儿童访谈(CI-BPD):结果:通过三向ROC分析,确定了BPFS-C自我报告版和家长报告版的临界分数,可将患有边缘型人格障碍的青少年与患有亚临床边缘型人格障碍的青少年区分开来,也可将患有亚临床边缘型人格障碍的青少年与健康青少年区分开来:这些研究结果支持使用两种版本的 BPFS-C 来检测患有 BPD 和亚临床 BPD 的青少年。
期刊介绍:
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation provides a platform for researchers and clinicians interested in borderline personality disorder (BPD) as a currently highly challenging psychiatric disorder. Emotion dysregulation is at the core of BPD but also stands on its own as a major pathological component of the underlying neurobiology of various other psychiatric disorders. The journal focuses on the psychological, social and neurobiological aspects of emotion dysregulation as well as epidemiology, phenomenology, pathophysiology, treatment, neurobiology, genetics, and animal models of BPD.