Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation最新文献

Background: Women with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are also often diagnosed with personality disorders, yet research on reliable and valid assessments of personality pathology in this population has been limited.

Methods: In this study, the psychometric properties of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale- Brief Form - 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) were examined in a sample of 171 adult women with ADHD.

Results: A two-factor structure was identified, with one factor, LPF-self, comprised of six items, reflecting impairment in self functioning; the second factor, LPF-interpersonal, comprised of six items, reflecting impairment in interpersonal functioning. LPFS-BF 2.0 factors contributed unique variance to functional impairment beyond the effects of co-occurring depression, anxiety, and ADHD.

Conclusions: These findings suggest the LPFS-BF 2.0 may be important to include in clinical care for women with ADHD, to identify those women with ADHD who may require adjunctive intervention for personality pathology.

Background: Disruptions in epistemic trust have been recognised as key sequelae of trauma and as markers of vulnerability to borderline personality pathology. However, prior research has relied primarily on self-reports and lacks behavioural measures of epistemic stance. The present pre-registered studies introduce a novel behavioural task-the Balloon Analogue Risk Task for Epistemic Trust (BART-ET)-and examine its associations with borderline personality features, trauma history, and psychological distress.

Methods: Two cross-sectional studies were conducted with a combined sample of 273 young adults aged 18-25 (Study 1: N = 120; Study 2: N = 153). Participants completed self-report measures of borderline personality features (PAI-BOR) and epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity (ETMCQ). Study 2 additionally included the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-GSI). All participants completed the BART-ET in a laboratory setting, which operationalised epistemic mistrust as the degree of deviation from a confederate experimenter's advice during a risk-taking task. Analyses involved correlational tests and structural equation modelling (SEM) to evaluate hypothesised associations and mediation pathways.

Results: As expected, across both studies, higher levels of borderline personality traits were associated with greater epistemic mistrust-both behaviourally (on the BART-ET) and via self-report (ETMCQ)-and with greater epistemic credulity, but not with epistemic trust, as measured with the ETMCQ. Behavioural and self-report measures of mistrust were significantly correlated, suggesting convergent validity of the BART-ET as an index of epistemic mistrust. In Study 2, childhood trauma exposure was associated with borderline features and with epistemic mistrust assessed behaviourally and via self-report. Preregistered mediation models controlling for general distress (BSI-GSI) suggested that the association between childhood trauma and epistemic mistrust was not unique to BPD features.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that epistemic mistrust-rather than a simple absence of trust-is a social-cognitive correlate of borderline personality vulnerability and trauma exposure in young adults. The results also indicate that the BART-ET may be a useful behavioural tool for studying epistemic mistrust in clinical contexts, though further validation is needed.

Background: Mothers with borderline personality disorder face unique challenges in parenting, as borderline symptoms have been shown to negatively affect parent-child relationships. These challenges can lead to non-supportive reactions to children's negative emotions, a form of parent emotion socialization (PES) that has been linked to negative outcomes in children. Given the inherent emotional arousal evoked by parenting, emotion dysregulation likely influences the type of PES parents utilize. However, few studies have specifically examined how emotion dysregulation affects PES in mothers with borderline pathology. Against this background, this study aims to (1) investigate the link between maternal emotion dysregulation and PES strategies and (2) assess if emotion dysregulation moderates the relationship between presence of significant borderline pathology and PES.

Methods: The study sample was comprised of 148 mothers (Mage = 34.92). Of these mothers, 53 had significant borderline features-that is, they either met full diagnostic criteria or exhibited marked subthreshold symptoms. Emotion regulation was evaluated using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form, and PES was assessed using the Coping with Children's Negative Emotion Scale. Significant borderline features were determined using the Personality Assessment Inventory Borderline Scale. As a part of aim 1, bivariate correlations were conducted to examine relationships between emotion dysregulation and two PES strategies: supportive and non-supportive. The moderating role of emotion dysregulation on the relationships between borderline features and supportive and non-supportive PES was assessed using two moderation models.

Results: Results from the first aim revealed a small, negative correlation between emotion dysregulation and supportive PES and a medium, positive correlation between emotion dysregulation and non-supportive PES. Emotion dysregulation was found to be a significant moderator of the relationship between borderline pathology and non-supportive PES.

Conclusions: The current study significantly contributes to the literature by further elucidating the relationship between maternal borderline pathology and PES and its underlying mechanisms.