{"title":"Matters We Metric Vs. Metrics that Matter.","authors":"Naoko Onizuka, Liron Sinvani, Carmen Quatman","doi":"10.1177/21514593241277737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Geriatric fracture is a pressing global health issue, marked by elevated mortality and morbidity rates and escalating health care costs. The evolving health care system from fee-for-service to quality-based reimbursement has led to externally driven reward and reimbursement systems that may not account for the complexity of caring for older adults with fracture.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The aim of this review is to highlight the need for a shift towards meaningful metrics that impact geriatric fracture care and to issue a call to action for all medical societies to advocate for national reimbursement and ranking systems that focus on metrics that truly matter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional metrics, while easier to capture, may not necessarily represent high quality care and may even have unintentional adverse consequences. For example, the focus on reducing length of stay may lead to older patients being discharged too early, without adequately addressing pain, constipation, or delirium. In addition, a focus on mortality may miss the opportunity to deliver compassionate end-of-life care. Existing geriatric fracture care metrics have expanded beyond traditional metrics to include assessment by geriatricians, fracture prevention, and delirium assessments. However, there is a need to further consider and develop patient-focused metrics. The Age-Friendly Health Initiative (4 Ms), which includes Mobility, Medication, Mentation, and what Matters is an evidence-based framework for assessing and acting on critical issues in the care of older adults. Additional metrics that should be considered include an assessment of nutrition and secondary fracture prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the realm of geriatric fracture care, the metrics currently employed often revolve around adherence to established guidelines and are heavily influenced by financial considerations. It is crucial to shift the paradigm towards metrics that truly matter for geriatric fracture patients, recognizing the multifaceted nature of their care and the profound impact these fractures have on their lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"15 ","pages":"21514593241277737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241277737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Geriatric fracture is a pressing global health issue, marked by elevated mortality and morbidity rates and escalating health care costs. The evolving health care system from fee-for-service to quality-based reimbursement has led to externally driven reward and reimbursement systems that may not account for the complexity of caring for older adults with fracture.
Significance: The aim of this review is to highlight the need for a shift towards meaningful metrics that impact geriatric fracture care and to issue a call to action for all medical societies to advocate for national reimbursement and ranking systems that focus on metrics that truly matter.
Results: Traditional metrics, while easier to capture, may not necessarily represent high quality care and may even have unintentional adverse consequences. For example, the focus on reducing length of stay may lead to older patients being discharged too early, without adequately addressing pain, constipation, or delirium. In addition, a focus on mortality may miss the opportunity to deliver compassionate end-of-life care. Existing geriatric fracture care metrics have expanded beyond traditional metrics to include assessment by geriatricians, fracture prevention, and delirium assessments. However, there is a need to further consider and develop patient-focused metrics. The Age-Friendly Health Initiative (4 Ms), which includes Mobility, Medication, Mentation, and what Matters is an evidence-based framework for assessing and acting on critical issues in the care of older adults. Additional metrics that should be considered include an assessment of nutrition and secondary fracture prevention.
Conclusion: In the realm of geriatric fracture care, the metrics currently employed often revolve around adherence to established guidelines and are heavily influenced by financial considerations. It is crucial to shift the paradigm towards metrics that truly matter for geriatric fracture patients, recognizing the multifaceted nature of their care and the profound impact these fractures have on their lives.
导言:老年骨折是一个紧迫的全球性健康问题,其特点是死亡率和发病率升高,医疗费用不断攀升。医疗保健系统从按服务收费向以质量为基础的报销制度转变,导致外部驱动的奖励和报销制度可能无法考虑到老年人骨折护理的复杂性:本综述旨在强调需要向影响老年骨折护理的有意义的指标转变,并呼吁所有医学协会采取行动,倡导以真正重要的指标为重点的国家报销和排名制度:结果:传统指标虽然更容易获取,但并不一定代表高质量的护理,甚至可能会产生无意的不良后果。例如,关注缩短住院时间可能会导致老年患者过早出院,而没有充分解决疼痛、便秘或谵妄等问题。此外,关注死亡率可能会错失提供富有同情心的临终关怀的机会。现有的老年骨折护理指标已经超越了传统的指标,包括老年病学专家评估、骨折预防和谵妄评估。然而,还需要进一步考虑和制定以患者为中心的指标。老年友好健康倡议(Age-Friendly Health Initiative,简称 4 Ms),包括行动、用药、指导和重要事项,是评估和解决老年人护理关键问题的循证框架。其他应考虑的指标包括营养评估和二级骨折预防:结论:在老年骨折护理领域,目前采用的衡量标准通常围绕对既定指南的遵守情况,并在很大程度上受到经济因素的影响。认识到老年骨折患者护理的多面性以及骨折对其生活的深远影响,将模式转向对老年骨折患者真正重要的指标至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).