The Relationship Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Markers of Chronic Pain Risk: Findings From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP).

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104659
Parker A Kell, Felicitas A Huber, Travis S Lowe, Joanna O Shadlow, Jamie L Rhudy
{"title":"The Relationship Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Markers of Chronic Pain Risk: Findings From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP).","authors":"Parker A Kell, Felicitas A Huber, Travis S Lowe, Joanna O Shadlow, Jamie L Rhudy","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to health inequities, including chronic pain. Yet, research examining socioeconomic disadvantage and pain risk in Native Americans (NAs) is scant. This exploratory analysis assessed relationships between socioeconomic position (SEP), ethnicity, and neighborhood disadvantage on pronociceptive processes in 272 healthy, chronic pain-free NAs (n = 139) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs, n = 133) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP). Neighborhood disadvantage was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Regression models tested whether ADI predicted pain-promoting outcomes (ie, peripheral fiber functionality, pain sensitivity, pain and nociceptive amplification, and endogenous pain inhibition) above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. The Ethnicity × ADI interaction was also tested. Of the 11 outcomes tested, 9 were not statistically significant. Of the significant findings, neighborhood disadvantage predicted impaired inhibition of the nociceptive flexion reflex above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. Additionally, ethnicity moderated the relationship between ADI and warm detection threshold; disadvantage was associated with higher thresholds for NAs, but not for NHWs. Together, the results suggest neighborhood disadvantage is associated with reduced C-fiber function and impaired spinal inhibition, thus pointing to a role of neighborhood disadvantage in the relationship between the environment and pain inequities. PERSPECTIVE: This study assessed neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and pronociceptive processes in chronic pain-free Native Americans (NAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Irrespective of ethnicity, greater neighborhood disadvantage predicted less descending inhibition of spinal nociception. Neighborhood disadvantage was associated with a marker of C-fiber impairment (higher warm detection threshold) in NAs only.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to health inequities, including chronic pain. Yet, research examining socioeconomic disadvantage and pain risk in Native Americans (NAs) is scant. This exploratory analysis assessed relationships between socioeconomic position (SEP), ethnicity, and neighborhood disadvantage on pronociceptive processes in 272 healthy, chronic pain-free NAs (n = 139) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs, n = 133) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP). Neighborhood disadvantage was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Regression models tested whether ADI predicted pain-promoting outcomes (ie, peripheral fiber functionality, pain sensitivity, pain and nociceptive amplification, and endogenous pain inhibition) above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. The Ethnicity × ADI interaction was also tested. Of the 11 outcomes tested, 9 were not statistically significant. Of the significant findings, neighborhood disadvantage predicted impaired inhibition of the nociceptive flexion reflex above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. Additionally, ethnicity moderated the relationship between ADI and warm detection threshold; disadvantage was associated with higher thresholds for NAs, but not for NHWs. Together, the results suggest neighborhood disadvantage is associated with reduced C-fiber function and impaired spinal inhibition, thus pointing to a role of neighborhood disadvantage in the relationship between the environment and pain inequities. PERSPECTIVE: This study assessed neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and pronociceptive processes in chronic pain-free Native Americans (NAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Irrespective of ethnicity, greater neighborhood disadvantage predicted less descending inhibition of spinal nociception. Neighborhood disadvantage was associated with a marker of C-fiber impairment (higher warm detection threshold) in NAs only.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邻里劣势与慢性疼痛风险标记之间的关系:俄克拉荷马州美国原住民疼痛风险研究 (OK-SNAP) 的发现。
社会经济劣势导致健康不公平,包括慢性疼痛。然而,对美国原住民(NAs)的社会经济劣势和疼痛风险的研究却很少。这项探索性分析评估了来自俄克拉荷马州美国原住民疼痛风险研究(OK-SNAP)的 272 名健康、无慢性疼痛的美国原住民(139 人)和非西班牙裔白人(133 人)的社会经济地位(SEP)、种族和邻里劣势与前感觉过程之间的关系。邻里劣势通过地区贫困指数(ADI)进行量化。回归模型检验了 ADI 对疼痛促进结果(即外周纤维功能、疼痛敏感性、疼痛和痛觉放大、内源性疼痛抑制)的预测是否超过了 SEP 和种族。此外,还测试了种族 x ADI 的交互作用。在测试的 11 项结果中,有 9 项没有统计学意义。在有意义的结果中,邻里劣势预示着痛觉屈曲反射抑制能力的减弱,其程度高于 SEP 和种族。此外,种族也调节了 ADI 与温暖检测阈值之间的关系;弱势与有色人种较高的阈值有关,但与非有色人种无关。总之,研究结果表明,邻里劣势与 C 纤维功能降低和脊髓抑制受损有关;因此,邻里劣势在环境与疼痛不平等之间的关系中扮演着重要角色。观点:本研究评估了无慢性疼痛的美国原住民(NAs)和非西班牙裔白人(NHWs)的邻里社会经济劣势和前感觉过程。无论种族如何,邻里劣势越大,脊髓痛觉的降序抑制作用就越弱。邻里劣势仅与美国原住民的 C 纤维受损标志物(较高的温暖检测阈值)有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) use for self-management of pain: Insights from cross-sectional and ecological momentary assessment data. Optimizing Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Findings from the Pain Management Collaboratory. Corrigendum to "Mobile app use among persons with fibromyalgia: a cross-sectional survey" [J Pain, Volume 25, Issue 8, August 2024, 104515]. Pain prevalence rates and the mediating role of negative affect in adults referred to personality disorder treatment: A cross-sectional study. A conceptual model for assessing the risk of unidentified pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1