The Relationship Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Markers of Chronic Pain Risk: Findings From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP).
Parker A Kell, Felicitas A Huber, Travis S Lowe, Joanna O Shadlow, Jamie L Rhudy
{"title":"The Relationship Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Markers of Chronic Pain Risk: Findings From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP).","authors":"Parker A Kell, Felicitas A Huber, Travis S Lowe, Joanna O Shadlow, Jamie L Rhudy","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to health inequities, including chronic pain. Yet, research examining socioeconomic disadvantage and pain risk in Native Americans (NAs) is scant. This exploratory analysis assessed relationships between socioeconomic position (SEP), ethnicity, and neighborhood disadvantage on pronociceptive processes in 272 healthy, chronic pain-free NAs (n = 139) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs, n = 133) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP). Neighborhood disadvantage was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Regression models tested whether ADI predicted pain-promoting outcomes (ie, peripheral fiber functionality, pain sensitivity, pain and nociceptive amplification, and endogenous pain inhibition) above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. The Ethnicity × ADI interaction was also tested. Of the 11 outcomes tested, 9 were not statistically significant. Of the significant findings, neighborhood disadvantage predicted impaired inhibition of the nociceptive flexion reflex above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. Additionally, ethnicity moderated the relationship between ADI and warm detection threshold; disadvantage was associated with higher thresholds for NAs, but not for NHWs. Together, the results suggest neighborhood disadvantage is associated with reduced C-fiber function and impaired spinal inhibition, thus pointing to a role of neighborhood disadvantage in the relationship between the environment and pain inequities. PERSPECTIVE: This study assessed neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and pronociceptive processes in chronic pain-free Native Americans (NAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Irrespective of ethnicity, greater neighborhood disadvantage predicted less descending inhibition of spinal nociception. Neighborhood disadvantage was associated with a marker of C-fiber impairment (higher warm detection threshold) in NAs only.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to health inequities, including chronic pain. Yet, research examining socioeconomic disadvantage and pain risk in Native Americans (NAs) is scant. This exploratory analysis assessed relationships between socioeconomic position (SEP), ethnicity, and neighborhood disadvantage on pronociceptive processes in 272 healthy, chronic pain-free NAs (n = 139) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs, n = 133) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP). Neighborhood disadvantage was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Regression models tested whether ADI predicted pain-promoting outcomes (ie, peripheral fiber functionality, pain sensitivity, pain and nociceptive amplification, and endogenous pain inhibition) above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. The Ethnicity × ADI interaction was also tested. Of the 11 outcomes tested, 9 were not statistically significant. Of the significant findings, neighborhood disadvantage predicted impaired inhibition of the nociceptive flexion reflex above-and-beyond SEP and ethnicity. Additionally, ethnicity moderated the relationship between ADI and warm detection threshold; disadvantage was associated with higher thresholds for NAs, but not for NHWs. Together, the results suggest neighborhood disadvantage is associated with reduced C-fiber function and impaired spinal inhibition, thus pointing to a role of neighborhood disadvantage in the relationship between the environment and pain inequities. PERSPECTIVE: This study assessed neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and pronociceptive processes in chronic pain-free Native Americans (NAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Irrespective of ethnicity, greater neighborhood disadvantage predicted less descending inhibition of spinal nociception. Neighborhood disadvantage was associated with a marker of C-fiber impairment (higher warm detection threshold) in NAs only.
社会经济劣势导致健康不公平,包括慢性疼痛。然而,对美国原住民(NAs)的社会经济劣势和疼痛风险的研究却很少。这项探索性分析评估了来自俄克拉荷马州美国原住民疼痛风险研究(OK-SNAP)的 272 名健康、无慢性疼痛的美国原住民(139 人)和非西班牙裔白人(133 人)的社会经济地位(SEP)、种族和邻里劣势与前感觉过程之间的关系。邻里劣势通过地区贫困指数(ADI)进行量化。回归模型检验了 ADI 对疼痛促进结果(即外周纤维功能、疼痛敏感性、疼痛和痛觉放大、内源性疼痛抑制)的预测是否超过了 SEP 和种族。此外,还测试了种族 x ADI 的交互作用。在测试的 11 项结果中,有 9 项没有统计学意义。在有意义的结果中,邻里劣势预示着痛觉屈曲反射抑制能力的减弱,其程度高于 SEP 和种族。此外,种族也调节了 ADI 与温暖检测阈值之间的关系;弱势与有色人种较高的阈值有关,但与非有色人种无关。总之,研究结果表明,邻里劣势与 C 纤维功能降低和脊髓抑制受损有关;因此,邻里劣势在环境与疼痛不平等之间的关系中扮演着重要角色。观点:本研究评估了无慢性疼痛的美国原住民(NAs)和非西班牙裔白人(NHWs)的邻里社会经济劣势和前感觉过程。无论种族如何,邻里劣势越大,脊髓痛觉的降序抑制作用就越弱。邻里劣势仅与美国原住民的 C 纤维受损标志物(较高的温暖检测阈值)有关。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.