POCUS literature primer: key papers on cardiac and lung POCUS.

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00755-8
Daniel J Kim, Gillian Sheppard, David Lewis, Ian M Buchanan, Tomislav Jelic, Rajiv Thavanathan, Frank Myslik, Elizabeth Lalande, Colin R Bell, Jordan Chenkin, Claire L Heslop, Paul Olszynski, Paul Atkinson, Talia Burwash-Brennan
{"title":"POCUS literature primer: key papers on cardiac and lung POCUS.","authors":"Daniel J Kim, Gillian Sheppard, David Lewis, Ian M Buchanan, Tomislav Jelic, Rajiv Thavanathan, Frank Myslik, Elizabeth Lalande, Colin R Bell, Jordan Chenkin, Claire L Heslop, Paul Olszynski, Paul Atkinson, Talia Burwash-Brennan","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00755-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although point of care ultrasound (POCUS) use has become prevalent in medicine, clinicians may not be familiar with the evidence supporting its utility in patient care. The objective of this study is to identify the top five most influential papers published on the use of cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 14-member expert panel from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Emergency Ultrasound Committee and the Canadian Ultrasound Fellowship Collaborative used a modified Delphi process. Panel members are ultrasound fellowship trained or equivalent, are engaged in POCUS scholarship, and are leaders in POCUS locally and nationally in Canada. The modified Delphi process consisted of three rounds of sequential surveys and discussion to achieve consensus on the top five most influential papers on cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 relevant papers on cardiac POCUS and 68 relevant papers on lung POCUS were nominated by the panel. There was 100% participation by the panel members in all three rounds of the modified Delphi process. At the end of this process, we identified the top five most influential papers on cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS. Papers include studies supporting the use of POCUS for accurately assessing left ventricular systolic function, diagnosing pericardial effusion, clarifying its test characteristics for pulmonary embolism, identifying pulmonary edema and pneumonia, as well as consensus statements on the use of cardiac and lung POCUS in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have created a list of the top five influential papers on cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS as an evidence-based resource for trainees, clinicians, and researchers. This will help trainees and clinicians better understand how to use POCUS when scanning the heart and lungs, and it will also help researchers better understand where to direct their scholarly efforts with future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"713-720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00755-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although point of care ultrasound (POCUS) use has become prevalent in medicine, clinicians may not be familiar with the evidence supporting its utility in patient care. The objective of this study is to identify the top five most influential papers published on the use of cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS in adult patients.

Methods: A 14-member expert panel from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Emergency Ultrasound Committee and the Canadian Ultrasound Fellowship Collaborative used a modified Delphi process. Panel members are ultrasound fellowship trained or equivalent, are engaged in POCUS scholarship, and are leaders in POCUS locally and nationally in Canada. The modified Delphi process consisted of three rounds of sequential surveys and discussion to achieve consensus on the top five most influential papers on cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS.

Results: A total of 66 relevant papers on cardiac POCUS and 68 relevant papers on lung POCUS were nominated by the panel. There was 100% participation by the panel members in all three rounds of the modified Delphi process. At the end of this process, we identified the top five most influential papers on cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS. Papers include studies supporting the use of POCUS for accurately assessing left ventricular systolic function, diagnosing pericardial effusion, clarifying its test characteristics for pulmonary embolism, identifying pulmonary edema and pneumonia, as well as consensus statements on the use of cardiac and lung POCUS in clinical practice.

Conclusion: We have created a list of the top five influential papers on cardiac POCUS and lung POCUS as an evidence-based resource for trainees, clinicians, and researchers. This will help trainees and clinicians better understand how to use POCUS when scanning the heart and lungs, and it will also help researchers better understand where to direct their scholarly efforts with future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
POCUS 文献入门:有关心脏和肺部 POCUS 的重要文献。
目的:尽管医疗点超声(POCUS)的使用在医学界已十分普遍,但临床医生可能并不熟悉支持其在患者护理中的实用性的证据。本研究旨在找出发表的关于在成人患者中使用心脏 POCUS 和肺部 POCUS 的最有影响力的五篇论文:由加拿大急诊医师协会(CAEP)急诊超声委员会和加拿大超声研究员合作组织的 14 位成员组成的专家小组采用了改良的德尔菲流程。专家组成员均接受过超声研究培训或同等培训,从事 POCUS 学术研究,并且是加拿大当地和全国 POCUS 领域的领军人物。改良德尔菲法包括三轮顺序调查和讨论,以就心脏 POCUS 和肺部 POCUS 方面最有影响力的五篇论文达成共识:专家组共提名了 66 篇心脏 POCUS 相关论文和 68 篇肺部 POCUS 相关论文。在改良德尔菲法的三轮过程中,专家组成员的参与率均为 100%。在这一过程结束时,我们确定了关于心脏 POCUS 和肺部 POCUS 的五篇最具影响力的论文。这些论文包括支持使用 POCUS 准确评估左心室收缩功能、诊断心包积液、明确肺栓塞的检查特征、识别肺水肿和肺炎的研究,以及在临床实践中使用心脏和肺部 POCUS 的共识声明:我们创建了一份关于心脏 POCUS 和肺部 POCUS 的五大影响力论文列表,作为学员、临床医生和研究人员的循证资源。这将帮助学员和临床医生更好地了解在扫描心脏和肺部时如何使用 POCUS,也将帮助研究人员更好地了解未来研究的学术方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine learning outperforms the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in predicting need for early critical care. The role of partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in pre-hospital trauma. Just the facts: evaluation and management of epistaxis. Safety and accuracy of the computer interpretation of normal ECGs at triage. Correction: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of rapid HIV testing in Canadian Emergency Departments: a mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1