Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00807-z
Lars Grant, Magueye Diagne, Rafael Aroutiunian, Devin Hopkins, Tian Bai, Flemming Kondrup, Gregory Clark
Study objective: This study investigates the potential to improve emergency department (ED) triage using machine learning models by comparing their predictive performance with the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) in identifying the need for critical care within 12 h of ED arrival.
Methods: Three machine learning models (LASSO regression, gradient-boosted trees, and a deep learning model with embeddings) were developed using retrospective data from 670,841 ED visits to the Jewish General Hospital from June 2012 to Jan 2021. The model outcome was the need for critical care within the first 12 h of ED arrival. Metrics, including the areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) and precision-recall curve (PRC) were used for performance evaluation. Shapley additive explanation scores were used to compare predictor importance.
Results: The three machine learning models (deep learning, gradient-boosted trees and LASSO regression) had areas under the ROC of 0.926 ± 0.003, 0.912 ± 0.003 and 0.892 ± 0.004 respectively, and areas under the PRC of 0.27 ± 0.01, 0.24 ± 0.01 and 0.23 ± 0.01 respectively. In comparison, the CTAS score had an area under the ROC of 0.804 ± 0.006 and under the PRC of 0.11 ± 0.01. The predictors of most importance were similar between the models.
Conclusions: Machine learning models outperformed CTAS in identifying, at the point of ED triage, patients likely to need early critical care. If validated in future studies, machine learning models such as the ones developed here may be considered for incorporation in future revisions of the CTAS triage algorithm, potentially improving discrimination and reliability.
{"title":"Machine learning outperforms the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in predicting need for early critical care.","authors":"Lars Grant, Magueye Diagne, Rafael Aroutiunian, Devin Hopkins, Tian Bai, Flemming Kondrup, Gregory Clark","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00807-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-024-00807-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>This study investigates the potential to improve emergency department (ED) triage using machine learning models by comparing their predictive performance with the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) in identifying the need for critical care within 12 h of ED arrival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three machine learning models (LASSO regression, gradient-boosted trees, and a deep learning model with embeddings) were developed using retrospective data from 670,841 ED visits to the Jewish General Hospital from June 2012 to Jan 2021. The model outcome was the need for critical care within the first 12 h of ED arrival. Metrics, including the areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) and precision-recall curve (PRC) were used for performance evaluation. Shapley additive explanation scores were used to compare predictor importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three machine learning models (deep learning, gradient-boosted trees and LASSO regression) had areas under the ROC of 0.926 ± 0.003, 0.912 ± 0.003 and 0.892 ± 0.004 respectively, and areas under the PRC of 0.27 ± 0.01, 0.24 ± 0.01 and 0.23 ± 0.01 respectively. In comparison, the CTAS score had an area under the ROC of 0.804 ± 0.006 and under the PRC of 0.11 ± 0.01. The predictors of most importance were similar between the models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models outperformed CTAS in identifying, at the point of ED triage, patients likely to need early critical care. If validated in future studies, machine learning models such as the ones developed here may be considered for incorporation in future revisions of the CTAS triage algorithm, potentially improving discrimination and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00811-3
Sparsh Shah, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt, Brodie Nolan
{"title":"The role of partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in pre-hospital trauma.","authors":"Sparsh Shah, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt, Brodie Nolan","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00811-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-024-00811-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00790-5
Valérie Langlois-Carbonneau, François Dufresne, Ève Labbé, Katia Hamelin, Djamal Berbiche, Sophie Gosselin
Background: ECGs performed at ED triage are mandatorily assessed by an emergency physician contributing to task interruptions, decreased quality of care and increased error risk. Recent literature suggests that a triage ECG interpreted as normal by the ECG machine software correlates with benign interpretation from attending cardiologists. Ambiguity persists regarding the safety of the normal computerized ECG interpretation and whether real-time physician review is needed.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated the GE Marquette 12SL ECG software's clinical accuracy for normal triage ECGs. We compared machine interpretation, ED physicians' real-time interpretation and management as well as cardiologists systematic but delayed review of the ECGs to establish diagnostic accuracy and safety of a normal software interpretation. Additional data were collected from the emergency department patient tracking system and charts to determine patient outcomes when machine normal interpretation differed from ED physicians and cardiologists' analysis.
Results: Between November 16th 2020 and November 19th 2021, we collected 1220 machine-normal ECGs performed at Charles-Le Moyne Hospital ED triage. 1051 ECGs were eligible for inclusion. ED physicians agreed with the machine for 1028 normal diagnoses (97.8% IC (0.95): 96.7-98.5) and cardiologists agreed with the machine for 1037 ECGs (98.7% IC (0.95) 97.8-99.2). Relevant changes in ED management were recorded in three patients (0.29% IC (0.95): 0.1-0.8) whose ECGs were read as normal by the software: two emergent referrals to the catheterization lab and one emergent transfer to the resuscitation bay with next day coronarography.
Conclusion: A normal ECG interpretation from the GE Marquette 12SL ECG software at ED triage has a very high accuracy and a very low probability of clinically relevant change in patient outcome and ED trajectory.
背景:急诊室分诊时所做的心电图必须由急诊医生进行评估,这会导致任务中断、护理质量下降和出错风险增加。最近的文献表明,由心电图机软件解释为正常的分诊心电图与心脏科主治医生的良性解释相关。关于计算机化正常心电图判读的安全性以及是否需要医生实时复查的问题仍不明确:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们评估了 GE Marquette 12SL 心电图软件对正常分诊心电图的临床准确性。我们比较了机器判读、急诊科医生的实时判读和管理以及心内科医生对心电图的系统但延迟的审查,以确定正常软件判读的诊断准确性和安全性。我们还从急诊科患者追踪系统和病历中收集了其他数据,以确定当机器的正常判读与急诊科医生和心脏病专家的分析不同时,患者的治疗效果:在 2020 年 11 月 16 日至 2021 年 11 月 19 日期间,我们收集了查尔斯-勒莫恩医院急诊科分诊室的 1220 份机器正常心电图。符合纳入条件的心电图有 1051 份。急诊室医生与机器一致同意 1028 项正常诊断(97.8% IC (0.95): 96.7-98.5),心脏病专家与机器一致同意 1037 项心电图(98.7% IC (0.95) 97.8-99.2)。有三名患者(0.29% IC (0.95):0.1-0.8)的心电图被软件判读为正常,因此急诊室的处理发生了相关变化:两名患者紧急转诊至导管室,一名患者紧急转入复苏室,第二天进行冠状动脉造影:结论:在急诊室分诊时,GE Marquette 12SL 心电图软件对正常心电图的解读具有极高的准确性,而对患者预后和急诊室轨迹造成临床相关改变的可能性极低。
{"title":"Safety and accuracy of the computer interpretation of normal ECGs at triage.","authors":"Valérie Langlois-Carbonneau, François Dufresne, Ève Labbé, Katia Hamelin, Djamal Berbiche, Sophie Gosselin","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00790-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00790-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ECGs performed at ED triage are mandatorily assessed by an emergency physician contributing to task interruptions, decreased quality of care and increased error risk. Recent literature suggests that a triage ECG interpreted as normal by the ECG machine software correlates with benign interpretation from attending cardiologists. Ambiguity persists regarding the safety of the normal computerized ECG interpretation and whether real-time physician review is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated the GE Marquette 12SL ECG software's clinical accuracy for normal triage ECGs. We compared machine interpretation, ED physicians' real-time interpretation and management as well as cardiologists systematic but delayed review of the ECGs to establish diagnostic accuracy and safety of a normal software interpretation. Additional data were collected from the emergency department patient tracking system and charts to determine patient outcomes when machine normal interpretation differed from ED physicians and cardiologists' analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 16th 2020 and November 19th 2021, we collected 1220 machine-normal ECGs performed at Charles-Le Moyne Hospital ED triage. 1051 ECGs were eligible for inclusion. ED physicians agreed with the machine for 1028 normal diagnoses (97.8% IC (0.95): 96.7-98.5) and cardiologists agreed with the machine for 1037 ECGs (98.7% IC (0.95) 97.8-99.2). Relevant changes in ED management were recorded in three patients (0.29% IC (0.95): 0.1-0.8) whose ECGs were read as normal by the software: two emergent referrals to the catheterization lab and one emergent transfer to the resuscitation bay with next day coronarography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A normal ECG interpretation from the GE Marquette 12SL ECG software at ED triage has a very high accuracy and a very low probability of clinically relevant change in patient outcome and ED trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142640489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00820-2
Brit Long, Morgan Langille, Hans Rosenberg, Paul Atkinson
{"title":"Just the facts: evaluation and management of epistaxis.","authors":"Brit Long, Morgan Langille, Hans Rosenberg, Paul Atkinson","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00820-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00820-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142640488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00819-9
Jessica T Kent, Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie, Michelle Klaiman, Evelyn Marion Dell, Meghan Garnett, Megan Landes, Galo Fernando Ginocchio, Aya Alsefaou
{"title":"Correction: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of rapid HIV testing in Canadian Emergency Departments: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Jessica T Kent, Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie, Michelle Klaiman, Evelyn Marion Dell, Meghan Garnett, Megan Landes, Galo Fernando Ginocchio, Aya Alsefaou","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00819-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00819-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-10DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00809-x
Muhammad Taha Khan, Ammar Ishaq, Samia Rohail, Samia Aziz Sulaiman, Fatima Ali Raza, Haris Habib, Aman Goyal
Objective: Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric emergency department (ED) settings by investigating the incidence of cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurological adverse events associated with different sedation medications.
Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive database search for randomized controlled trials was performed across ten databases from January 2005 to June 2024. Our inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials involving children under 18 years old undergoing pediatric sedation and analgesia in the ED. Data on medication types, dosages, administration routes, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. Primary endpoints included cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurological adverse events.
Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, a total of 2,302 procedural sedations. The most common adverse events were vomiting, agitation, and hypoxia, which occurred in 104.9 [95% CI = 76.9-132.9], 37.5 [95% CI = 20.6-54.4], 38.3 [95% CI = 23.9-52.6] of each 1000 sedations, respectively. Other adverse events included apnea, hypotension, and the need for bag-valve mask ventilation, which occurred in 8.6 [95% CI: 3.5-13.6], 9.3 [95% CI: -1.4 to 20.1], and 13.5 [95% CI: 3.2-23.8] of each 1,000 sedations, respectively. Severe adverse events were rare, with no reported instances of intubation and only one case of laryngospasm. Subgroup analyses revealed varying incidence rates of adverse events across different sedation protocols, with ketamine and its combinations showing higher rates of specific respiratory complications.
Conclusions: Procedural sedation in pediatric EDs is generally safe, with a low incidence of adverse events, such as vomiting, agitation, and hypoxia. Life-threatening respiratory adverse events are extremely rare. Our findings thus support the careful selection and monitoring of sedation protocols to minimize risks.
目的我们的荟萃分析旨在通过调查与不同镇静药物相关的心脏、呼吸、胃肠道和神经系统不良事件的发生率,评估儿科急诊室(ED)手术镇静和镇痛的安全性:根据 PRISMA 指南,我们对 2005 年 1 月至 2024 年 6 月期间的 10 个数据库进行了随机对照试验的全面数据库检索。我们的纳入标准包括涉及在急诊室接受儿科镇静和镇痛治疗的 18 岁以下儿童的随机对照试验。我们提取并分析了有关药物类型、剂量、给药途径和不良事件的数据。主要终点包括心脏、呼吸、胃肠道和神经系统不良事件:17项研究符合纳入标准,共进行了2302次手术镇静。最常见的不良事件是呕吐、躁动和缺氧,在每1000次镇静中分别发生104.9次[95% CI = 76.9-132.9]、37.5次[95% CI = 20.6-54.4]、38.3次[95% CI = 23.9-52.6]。其他不良事件包括呼吸暂停、低血压和需要进行袋阀面罩通气,在每1000例镇静剂中分别发生8.6例[95% CI:3.5-13.6]、9.3例[95% CI:-1.4-20.1]和13.5例[95% CI:3.2-23.8]。严重不良事件很少发生,没有插管的报道,只有一例喉痉挛。亚组分析显示,不同镇静方案的不良事件发生率不同,氯胺酮及其复合制剂的特定呼吸系统并发症发生率较高:结论:在儿科急诊室进行手术镇静总体上是安全的,呕吐、躁动和缺氧等不良事件的发生率较低。危及生命的呼吸系统不良事件极为罕见。因此,我们的研究结果支持谨慎选择和监控镇静方案,以最大限度地降低风险。
{"title":"Evaluating the safety of procedural sedation in emergency department settings among the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Muhammad Taha Khan, Ammar Ishaq, Samia Rohail, Samia Aziz Sulaiman, Fatima Ali Raza, Haris Habib, Aman Goyal","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00809-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00809-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric emergency department (ED) settings by investigating the incidence of cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurological adverse events associated with different sedation medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive database search for randomized controlled trials was performed across ten databases from January 2005 to June 2024. Our inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials involving children under 18 years old undergoing pediatric sedation and analgesia in the ED. Data on medication types, dosages, administration routes, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. Primary endpoints included cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurological adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, a total of 2,302 procedural sedations. The most common adverse events were vomiting, agitation, and hypoxia, which occurred in 104.9 [95% CI = 76.9-132.9], 37.5 [95% CI = 20.6-54.4], 38.3 [95% CI = 23.9-52.6] of each 1000 sedations, respectively. Other adverse events included apnea, hypotension, and the need for bag-valve mask ventilation, which occurred in 8.6 [95% CI: 3.5-13.6], 9.3 [95% CI: -1.4 to 20.1], and 13.5 [95% CI: 3.2-23.8] of each 1,000 sedations, respectively. Severe adverse events were rare, with no reported instances of intubation and only one case of laryngospasm. Subgroup analyses revealed varying incidence rates of adverse events across different sedation protocols, with ketamine and its combinations showing higher rates of specific respiratory complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Procedural sedation in pediatric EDs is generally safe, with a low incidence of adverse events, such as vomiting, agitation, and hypoxia. Life-threatening respiratory adverse events are extremely rare. Our findings thus support the careful selection and monitoring of sedation protocols to minimize risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00796-z
Fumiya Inoue, Yuji Okazaki, Toshihisa Ichiba, Dai Agari, Akira Namera
Introduction: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus is a severe complication of lithium intoxication that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. While conventional electroencephalography (EEG) remains the gold standard for diagnosis for nonconvulsive status epilepticus, its implementation in emergency settings can be challenging and time-consuming. We present a case in which simplified EEG with six electrodes enabled rapid detection and monitoring of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in lithium intoxication in the emergency setting.
Case presentation: A 65-year-old woman with stable bipolar disorder presented to our emergency department with impaired consciousness. She had been maintained on lithium carbonate (1600 mg daily) and carbamazepine (400 mg daily) for over 10 years. Following two weeks of nausea and recent onset of agitation and slurred speech, she developed generalized convulsions. Laboratory examinations revealed elevated serum lithium (3.88 mEq/L) and acute renal dysfunction (creatinine 347.5 μmol/L). After resolving initial convulsions, a simplified sixelectrode EEG (Neurofax EEG-1250, Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), applied by an emergency physician, demonstrated generalized spike and wave patterns consistent with nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Despite initial seizure control with midazolam during intubation, continuous EEG monitoring revealed recurrent nonconvulsive status epilepticus. After hemodialysis and continued deep sedation, she was discharged on day 40 without neurological sequelae.
Discussion: This case demonstrates the utility of simplified EEG in emergency settings for early detection and monitoring of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in lithium intoxication. The ability of emergency physicians to apply and interpret simplified EEG enabled timely intervention and prevention of neurological complications. While further research is needed to validate interpretation protocols by non-EEG specialists, simplified EEG shows promise as an accessible tool for rapid assessment of neurotoxicity in lithium intoxication, potentially improving patient outcomes through earlier intervention.
简介非惊厥性癫痫状态是锂中毒的一种严重并发症,需要及时诊断和治疗。虽然传统脑电图(EEG)仍是诊断非惊厥性癫痫的黄金标准,但在急诊环境中实施这种诊断具有挑战性且耗时较长。我们介绍了一个病例,在该病例中,使用六个电极的简化脑电图能够在急诊环境中快速检测和监测锂中毒的非惊厥性癫痫状态:一名患有稳定型双相情感障碍的 65 岁女性因意识障碍到我院急诊科就诊。她服用碳酸锂(每天 1600 毫克)和卡马西平(每天 400 毫克)已超过 10 年。在两周的恶心症状和最近出现的烦躁不安、言语不清之后,她出现了全身抽搐。实验室检查显示血清锂升高(3.88 mEq/L)和急性肾功能障碍(肌酐 347.5 μmol/L)。最初的抽搐缓解后,急诊医生对其进行了简化的六电极脑电图检查(Neurofax EEG-1250, Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan),结果显示其全身棘波和波型与非惊厥性癫痫状态一致。尽管在插管期间使用咪达唑仑控制了最初的癫痫发作,但持续的脑电图监测显示非惊厥性癫痫状态反复发作。经过血液透析和持续深度镇静后,她于第40天出院,没有留下神经系统后遗症:本病例显示了简化脑电图在急诊环境中早期检测和监测锂中毒非惊厥性癫痫状态的实用性。急诊医生应用和解释简化脑电图的能力有助于及时干预和预防神经系统并发症。虽然还需要进一步的研究来验证非 EEG 专家的解读方案,但简化脑电图显示出其作为快速评估锂中毒神经毒性的便捷工具的前景,并有可能通过早期干预改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Early diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus due to lithium intoxication using 6-channel electroencephalography.","authors":"Fumiya Inoue, Yuji Okazaki, Toshihisa Ichiba, Dai Agari, Akira Namera","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00796-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00796-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nonconvulsive status epilepticus is a severe complication of lithium intoxication that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. While conventional electroencephalography (EEG) remains the gold standard for diagnosis for nonconvulsive status epilepticus, its implementation in emergency settings can be challenging and time-consuming. We present a case in which simplified EEG with six electrodes enabled rapid detection and monitoring of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in lithium intoxication in the emergency setting.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 65-year-old woman with stable bipolar disorder presented to our emergency department with impaired consciousness. She had been maintained on lithium carbonate (1600 mg daily) and carbamazepine (400 mg daily) for over 10 years. Following two weeks of nausea and recent onset of agitation and slurred speech, she developed generalized convulsions. Laboratory examinations revealed elevated serum lithium (3.88 mEq/L) and acute renal dysfunction (creatinine 347.5 μmol/L). After resolving initial convulsions, a simplified sixelectrode EEG (Neurofax EEG-1250, Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), applied by an emergency physician, demonstrated generalized spike and wave patterns consistent with nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Despite initial seizure control with midazolam during intubation, continuous EEG monitoring revealed recurrent nonconvulsive status epilepticus. After hemodialysis and continued deep sedation, she was discharged on day 40 without neurological sequelae.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case demonstrates the utility of simplified EEG in emergency settings for early detection and monitoring of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in lithium intoxication. The ability of emergency physicians to apply and interpret simplified EEG enabled timely intervention and prevention of neurological complications. While further research is needed to validate interpretation protocols by non-EEG specialists, simplified EEG shows promise as an accessible tool for rapid assessment of neurotoxicity in lithium intoxication, potentially improving patient outcomes through earlier intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142570682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00779-0
Kwasi Nkansah-Junior, Rawaan S Elsawi, Ian R Drennan, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan
Purpose: This study aimed to understand current prehospital trauma air-ambulance policies and triage guidelines across Canada. The research question centered on understanding the guidelines used by provinces and territories and identifying potential regional variations in air-ambulance triage.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from November 2022 to May 2023, involving trauma leaders from Canada's 13 provinces and territories. Participants were identified via the Trauma Association of Canada and professional networks. The survey, developed with expert input and pilot tested for clarity, focused on prehospital trauma-triage guidelines, level of adoption of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) triage guidelines, and auto-launch air-ambulance policies. Data were collected using an 18-item electronic survey. Potential response bias was considered, and confidentiality was maintained. A cross-sectional qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the guidelines' adoption and variations, with responses compared across regions.
Results: The analysis revealed a nationwide adoption (11 of 11 respondents) of the CDC guidelines, indicating a standardized approach to patient transportation. Notably, many provinces and territories (5 of 11) endorse auto-launch protocols for air ambulances in specific scenarios. These policies offer advantages in geographically vast regions weighed against the cost of over-triage and inefficient resource allocation. Each province and territory tailors its approach based on factors such as geographic areas served, and available resources.
Conclusion: This study provides a snapshot of the current state of prehospital trauma-triage guidelines in Canada. With some differences in nomenclature, Canadian provinces and territories widely apply the CDC guidelines to serve their populations. There is some regional variation on how transport is initiated within their borders. The findings underscore the delicate balance required for optimizing air-ambulance policies, considering factors such as timely access, resource allocation, and the local application of guidelines.
{"title":"Ready to launch: a cross-sectional study of field trauma triage and air-ambulance policies across Canada.","authors":"Kwasi Nkansah-Junior, Rawaan S Elsawi, Ian R Drennan, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00779-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-024-00779-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to understand current prehospital trauma air-ambulance policies and triage guidelines across Canada. The research question centered on understanding the guidelines used by provinces and territories and identifying potential regional variations in air-ambulance triage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey from November 2022 to May 2023, involving trauma leaders from Canada's 13 provinces and territories. Participants were identified via the Trauma Association of Canada and professional networks. The survey, developed with expert input and pilot tested for clarity, focused on prehospital trauma-triage guidelines, level of adoption of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) triage guidelines, and auto-launch air-ambulance policies. Data were collected using an 18-item electronic survey. Potential response bias was considered, and confidentiality was maintained. A cross-sectional qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the guidelines' adoption and variations, with responses compared across regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed a nationwide adoption (11 of 11 respondents) of the CDC guidelines, indicating a standardized approach to patient transportation. Notably, many provinces and territories (5 of 11) endorse auto-launch protocols for air ambulances in specific scenarios. These policies offer advantages in geographically vast regions weighed against the cost of over-triage and inefficient resource allocation. Each province and territory tailors its approach based on factors such as geographic areas served, and available resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a snapshot of the current state of prehospital trauma-triage guidelines in Canada. With some differences in nomenclature, Canadian provinces and territories widely apply the CDC guidelines to serve their populations. There is some regional variation on how transport is initiated within their borders. The findings underscore the delicate balance required for optimizing air-ambulance policies, considering factors such as timely access, resource allocation, and the local application of guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"797-803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142334378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00800-6
Gillian Sheppard, Keerat Grewal, Teresa M Chan
{"title":"What's luck got to do with it? Taking an institutional approach to gender inequity in academic EM leadership.","authors":"Gillian Sheppard, Keerat Grewal, Teresa M Chan","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00800-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00800-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":"26 11","pages":"765-767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-10DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00761-w
Benjamin Gompels, Luke McCarron, Luka Jovanovic, Thomas Molloy, Vazeer Ahmed, Martin Gargan, Mike Barrett
{"title":"Just the Facts: Assessing and managing soft tissue knee injuries in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Benjamin Gompels, Luke McCarron, Luka Jovanovic, Thomas Molloy, Vazeer Ahmed, Martin Gargan, Mike Barrett","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00761-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-024-00761-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"778-780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141914872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}