The integration of omics and cultivation-dependent methods could effectively determine the biological risks associated with the utilization of soil conditioners in agriculture.

Journal of hazardous materials Pub Date : 2024-10-05 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135567
Arianna Peruzzo, Sara Petrin, Aurora Boscolo Anzoletti, Marzia Mancin, Andrea Di Cesare, Raffaella Sabatino, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo, Giovanni Beggio, Giulia Baggio, Patrizia Danesi, Lisa Barco, Carmen Losasso
{"title":"The integration of omics and cultivation-dependent methods could effectively determine the biological risks associated with the utilization of soil conditioners in agriculture.","authors":"Arianna Peruzzo, Sara Petrin, Aurora Boscolo Anzoletti, Marzia Mancin, Andrea Di Cesare, Raffaella Sabatino, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo, Giovanni Beggio, Giulia Baggio, Patrizia Danesi, Lisa Barco, Carmen Losasso","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the circular economy, reusing agricultural residues, treated biowaste, and sewage sludges-commonly referred to as soil conditioners-in agriculture is essential for converting waste into valuable resources. However, these materials can also contribute to the spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in treated soils. In this study, we analyzed different soil conditioners categorized into five groups: compost from source-separated biowaste and green waste, agro-industrial digestate, digestate from anaerobic digestion of source-separated biowaste, compost from biowaste digestate, and sludges from wastewater treatment plants. Under Italian law, only the first two categories are approved for agricultural use, despite Regulation 1009/2019/EU allowing the use of digestate from anaerobic digestion of source-separated biowaste in CE-marked fertilizers. We examined the bacterial community and associated resistome of each sample using metagenomic approaches. Additionally, we detected and isolated various pathogens to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential risks associated with sludge application in agriculture. The compost samples exhibited higher bacterial diversity and a greater abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria compared to other samples, except for wastewater treatment plant sludges, which had the highest frequency of Salmonella isolation and resistome diversity. Our findings suggest integrating omics and cultivation-dependent methods to accurately assess the biological risks of using sludge in agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":94082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the circular economy, reusing agricultural residues, treated biowaste, and sewage sludges-commonly referred to as soil conditioners-in agriculture is essential for converting waste into valuable resources. However, these materials can also contribute to the spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in treated soils. In this study, we analyzed different soil conditioners categorized into five groups: compost from source-separated biowaste and green waste, agro-industrial digestate, digestate from anaerobic digestion of source-separated biowaste, compost from biowaste digestate, and sludges from wastewater treatment plants. Under Italian law, only the first two categories are approved for agricultural use, despite Regulation 1009/2019/EU allowing the use of digestate from anaerobic digestion of source-separated biowaste in CE-marked fertilizers. We examined the bacterial community and associated resistome of each sample using metagenomic approaches. Additionally, we detected and isolated various pathogens to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential risks associated with sludge application in agriculture. The compost samples exhibited higher bacterial diversity and a greater abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria compared to other samples, except for wastewater treatment plant sludges, which had the highest frequency of Salmonella isolation and resistome diversity. Our findings suggest integrating omics and cultivation-dependent methods to accurately assess the biological risks of using sludge in agriculture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将全息图学和依赖于栽培的方法结合起来,可以有效地确定与农业中使用土壤改良剂相关的生物风险。
在循环经济中,将农业残留物、经处理的生物废物和污水淤泥(通常称为土壤改良剂)重新用于农业是将废物转化为宝贵资源的关键。然而,这些材料也可能导致抗菌病原体在处理过的土壤中传播。在这项研究中,我们对不同的土壤改良剂进行了分析,这些土壤改良剂分为五类:从源头分离的生物垃圾和绿色废物中提取的堆肥、农用工业沼渣、从源头分离的生物垃圾厌氧消化中提取的沼渣、从生物垃圾沼渣中提取的堆肥以及污水处理厂产生的污泥。根据意大利法律,尽管第 1009/2019/EU 号法规允许将源分离生物废物厌氧消化产生的沼渣用于 CE 标志肥料,但只有前两类沼渣获准用于农业。我们使用元基因组学方法研究了每个样本的细菌群落和相关抗性组。此外,我们还检测并分离了各种病原体,以全面了解污泥在农业中应用的潜在风险。与其他样品相比,堆肥样品表现出更高的细菌多样性和更丰富的潜在致病菌,但污水处理厂污泥除外,其沙门氏菌分离频率和抗性组多样性最高。我们的研究结果表明,要准确评估在农业中使用污泥的生物风险,必须将全息图学方法和依赖培养的方法结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic exploration of COVlD-19 antiviral drug ritonavir on anaerobic digestion through experimental validation coupled with metagenomics analysis. Antibiotic intermediates and antibiotics synergistically promote the development of multiple antibiotic resistance in antibiotic production wastewater. Study on the variation mechanism of Zn isotope in polluted farmland soil. Catalytic membrane with dual-layer structure for ultrafast degradation of emerging contaminants in surface water treatment. Phototransformation and photoreactivity of MPs-DOM in aqueous environment: Key role of MPs structure decoded by optical and molecular signatures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1