Quantifying doula association with maternal and neonatal outcomes.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.029
Lara S Lemon, Beth Quinn, Melissa Young, Hannah Keith, Amy Ruscetti, Hyagriv N Simhan
{"title":"Quantifying doula association with maternal and neonatal outcomes.","authors":"Lara S Lemon, Beth Quinn, Melissa Young, Hannah Keith, Amy Ruscetti, Hyagriv N Simhan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The US suffers from an increasing rate of severe maternal morbidity, paired with a wide disparity in maternal health by race. Doulas are posited to be a useful resource to increase positive outcomes and decrease this disparity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the association of doula care with a broad range of maternal and neonatal outcomes in various subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort of deliveries from 1/2021-12/2022 at a single institution receiving prenatal care. Exposure was receipt of doula care prenatally and at delivery. We evaluated both maternal (cesarean delivery, cesarean delivery of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex infant, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum emergency department visit, readmission and attendance at postpartum office visit) and neonatal (neonatal intensive care unit admission, unexpected complications in term newborns, breastfeeding, preterm delivery, and intrauterine fetal growth restriction) outcomes. Because our institution previously employed targeted outreach, offering doula services to patients at highest risk, we utilized multiple methods to generate an appropriate comparison population. We conducted multivariate logistic regression and conditional regressions using propensity scores, modeling likelihood of doula care, to generate adjusted risk differences associated with doula care. Analyses were repeated in populations stratified by race (White/Black) then payor status (public/commercial).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 17,831 deliveries; 486 with doula care and 17,345 without. Patients receiving doula care were more likely to self-report Black race, be publicly insured, and live in a more disadvantaged neighborhood. Regardless of analytic approach, for every 100 patients under doula care there were 15-34 more VBACs [adjRD 15.6 (95%CI: 3.8, 27.4); adjRD 34.2 (95%CI: 0.046, 68.0)] and 5-6 more patients attending a postpartum office visit [adjRD 5.4 (95%CI: 1.4, 9.5); adjRD 6.8 (95% CI:3.7, 9.9)] compared with those not receiving doula services. Infants born to these patients were 20% more like likely to be exclusively breastfed [adjRR 1.22 (95%CI: 1.07, 1.38)], and doula care was associated with 3-4 fewer preterm births [adjRD -3.8 (95%CI: -6.1, -1.5); -4.0 (95%CI: -6.2, -1.8)] for every 100 deliveries receiving doula care. Results were consistent regardless of race or insurance. Results were also consistent when doula care was redefined as having at least 3 prenatal encounters with a doula.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Doula care was associated with more VBACs, attendance at postpartum office visit, breastfeeding, and fewer preterm deliveries. The effect of doula care was consistent across race and insurance status.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The US suffers from an increasing rate of severe maternal morbidity, paired with a wide disparity in maternal health by race. Doulas are posited to be a useful resource to increase positive outcomes and decrease this disparity.

Objective: Evaluate the association of doula care with a broad range of maternal and neonatal outcomes in various subpopulations.

Study design: Retrospective cohort of deliveries from 1/2021-12/2022 at a single institution receiving prenatal care. Exposure was receipt of doula care prenatally and at delivery. We evaluated both maternal (cesarean delivery, cesarean delivery of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex infant, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum emergency department visit, readmission and attendance at postpartum office visit) and neonatal (neonatal intensive care unit admission, unexpected complications in term newborns, breastfeeding, preterm delivery, and intrauterine fetal growth restriction) outcomes. Because our institution previously employed targeted outreach, offering doula services to patients at highest risk, we utilized multiple methods to generate an appropriate comparison population. We conducted multivariate logistic regression and conditional regressions using propensity scores, modeling likelihood of doula care, to generate adjusted risk differences associated with doula care. Analyses were repeated in populations stratified by race (White/Black) then payor status (public/commercial).

Results: Our cohort included 17,831 deliveries; 486 with doula care and 17,345 without. Patients receiving doula care were more likely to self-report Black race, be publicly insured, and live in a more disadvantaged neighborhood. Regardless of analytic approach, for every 100 patients under doula care there were 15-34 more VBACs [adjRD 15.6 (95%CI: 3.8, 27.4); adjRD 34.2 (95%CI: 0.046, 68.0)] and 5-6 more patients attending a postpartum office visit [adjRD 5.4 (95%CI: 1.4, 9.5); adjRD 6.8 (95% CI:3.7, 9.9)] compared with those not receiving doula services. Infants born to these patients were 20% more like likely to be exclusively breastfed [adjRR 1.22 (95%CI: 1.07, 1.38)], and doula care was associated with 3-4 fewer preterm births [adjRD -3.8 (95%CI: -6.1, -1.5); -4.0 (95%CI: -6.2, -1.8)] for every 100 deliveries receiving doula care. Results were consistent regardless of race or insurance. Results were also consistent when doula care was redefined as having at least 3 prenatal encounters with a doula.

Conclusions: Doula care was associated with more VBACs, attendance at postpartum office visit, breastfeeding, and fewer preterm deliveries. The effect of doula care was consistent across race and insurance status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化朵拉与孕产妇和新生儿结局的关联。
背景:美国孕产妇严重发病率不断上升,同时不同种族的孕产妇健康状况也存在很大差异。朵拉被认为是一种有用的资源,可以增加积极的结果并减少这种差异:研究设计:研究设计:对 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在接受产前护理的单一机构分娩的产妇进行回顾性队列研究。研究对象在产前和分娩时接受了朵拉护理。我们评估了孕产妇(剖宫产、无胎儿、足月、单胎、顶点婴儿的剖宫产、剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)、妊娠高血压、子痫前期、产后急诊就诊、再入院和产后就诊)和新生儿(新生儿重症监护室入院、足月新生儿意外并发症、母乳喂养、早产和宫内胎儿生长受限)的结局。由于我们的医疗机构之前采用了有针对性的外展服务,为风险最高的患者提供朵拉服务,因此我们采用了多种方法来产生适当的对比人群。我们使用倾向评分进行了多变量逻辑回归和条件回归,模拟了朵拉护理的可能性,从而得出了与朵拉护理相关的调整后风险差异。在按种族(白人/黑人)和支付者状况(公共/商业)分层的人群中重复进行了分析:我们的队列包括17831例分娩,其中486例接受了朵拉护理,17345例未接受朵拉护理。接受朵拉护理的患者更有可能自述为黑人、参加了公共保险、居住在较为贫困的社区。无论采用哪种分析方法,与未接受朵拉服务的患者相比,每100名接受朵拉护理的患者中,VBACs增加了15-34例[adjRD 15.6 (95%CI: 3.8, 27.4); adjRD 34.2 (95%CI: 0.046, 68.0)],接受产后门诊的患者增加了5-6例[adjRD 5.4 (95%CI: 1.4, 9.5); adjRD 6.8 (95% CI:3.7, 9.9)]。在接受朵拉护理的每 100 例分娩中,这些患者所生的婴儿纯母乳喂养的可能性要高出 20% [adjRR 1.22 (95%CI: 1.07, 1.38)],而且朵拉护理使早产率降低了 3-4 [adjRD -3.8 (95%CI: -6.1, -1.5); -4.0 (95%CI: -6.2, -1.8)] 。无论种族或保险情况如何,结果都是一致的。如果将朵拉护理重新定义为至少3次与朵拉的产前接触,结果也是一致的:结论:朵拉护理与更多的VBAC、产后就诊、母乳喂养和更少的早产有关。朵拉护理对不同种族和保险状况的影响是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopic Myomectomy and the Risk for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Implications for Subfertile Patients and Underlying Pathophysiology. Advancing Maternal and Neonatal Health: A Comprehensive Approach to Methamphetamine Use in Pregnancy. Methamphetamine use in pregnancy: Avenues for future research. Risk of placenta accreta spectrum following myomectomy. Blood Pressure Control in Pregnant Patients with Chronic Hypertension and Diabetes: Should <130/80 be the Target?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1