首页 > 最新文献

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features diagnosed at less than 24 weeks. 对 24 周以内确诊的重度子痫前期进行预产期管理。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.031
Kristen A Cagino, Rylee D Trotter, Katherine E Lambert, Saloni C Kumar, Baha M Sibai

Background: The recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin offers no guidance on the management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation. Historically, immediate delivery was recommended because of poor perinatal outcomes and high maternal morbidity. Recently, advances in neonatal resuscitation have led to increased survival at periviable gestational ages.

Objective: This study aimed to report perinatal and maternal outcomes after expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation.

Study design: This was a retrospective case series of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation at a level 4 center between 2017 and 2023. Individuals requiring delivery within 24 hours of diagnosis were excluded. Perinatal and maternal outcomes were analyzed. Categorical variables from our database were compared with previously published data using chi-square tests.

Results: A total of 41 individuals were diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation. After the exclusion of delivery within 24 hours, 30 individuals (73%) were evaluated. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 22 weeks (interquartile range, 22-23). Moreover, 16% of individuals had assisted reproductive technology, 27% of individuals had chronic hypertension, 13% of individuals had pregestational diabetes mellitus, 30% of individuals had previous preeclampsia, and 73% of individuals had a body mass index of >30 kg/m2. The median latency periods at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation were 7 days (interquartile range, 4-23) and 8 days (interquartile range, 4-13). In preeclampsia with severe features, neonatal survival rates were 44% (95% confidence interval, 3%-85%) at 22 weeks of gestation and 29% (95% confidence interval, 1%-56%) at 23 weeks of gestation. There were 2 cases of acute kidney injury (7%) and 2 cases of pericardial or pleural effusions (7%). Overall perinatal survival at <24 weeks of gestation was 30% in our current study vs 7% in previous reports (P=.02).

Conclusion: For cases of expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation, our findings showed an increased perinatal survival rate with decreased maternal morbidity compared with previously published data. This information may be used when counseling on expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation.

背景:最近的美国妇产科协会实践公告没有对 24 周以内重度子痫前期(PreE with SF)的处理提供指导。一直以来,由于围产期预后差和产妇发病率高,建议立即分娩。最近,新生儿复苏技术的进步提高了围产期的存活率:研究设计:我们旨在报告围产期不足24周的SF早产儿的预产期管理后的围产期和孕产妇结局:这是一项回顾性病例系列研究,研究对象为2017-2023年间在一家IV级中心发生的PreE伴SF<24周的产妇。需要在确诊后24小时内分娩的患者被排除在外。对围产期和产妇结局进行了分析。使用卡方检验将我们数据库中的分类变量与之前发表的数据进行比较:结果:共有 41 人被诊断为 SF < 24 周的早产儿。在排除 24 小时内分娩的情况后,有 30 人(73%)接受了评估。诊断时的中位孕龄为 22 周(IQR 22-23 周)。16%的患者采用了辅助生殖技术,27%的患者患有慢性高血压,13%的患者患有妊娠糖尿病,30%的患者曾患有子痫前期,73%的患者体重指数大于30 kg/m2。22 周和 23 周的中位潜伏期分别为 7 天(IQR 4-23 天)和 8 天(IQR 4-13 天)。22周时SF发病的PreE新生儿存活率为44%(95% CI 3-85%),23周时为29%(95% CI 1-56%)。有两例急性肾损伤(7%)和两例心包/胸膜积液(7%)。在我们目前的研究中,小于24周的总体围产期存活率为30%,而在之前的报告中为7%(P=0.02):结论:与之前发表的数据相比,我们的研究结果表明,对于小于 24 周的 SFE 预产期管理病例,围产期存活率提高,产妇发病率降低。在对 SF<24 周的早产儿进行预产期管理咨询时,可以利用这一信息。
{"title":"Expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features diagnosed at less than 24 weeks.","authors":"Kristen A Cagino, Rylee D Trotter, Katherine E Lambert, Saloni C Kumar, Baha M Sibai","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin offers no guidance on the management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation. Historically, immediate delivery was recommended because of poor perinatal outcomes and high maternal morbidity. Recently, advances in neonatal resuscitation have led to increased survival at periviable gestational ages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to report perinatal and maternal outcomes after expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective case series of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation at a level 4 center between 2017 and 2023. Individuals requiring delivery within 24 hours of diagnosis were excluded. Perinatal and maternal outcomes were analyzed. Categorical variables from our database were compared with previously published data using chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 individuals were diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation. After the exclusion of delivery within 24 hours, 30 individuals (73%) were evaluated. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 22 weeks (interquartile range, 22-23). Moreover, 16% of individuals had assisted reproductive technology, 27% of individuals had chronic hypertension, 13% of individuals had pregestational diabetes mellitus, 30% of individuals had previous preeclampsia, and 73% of individuals had a body mass index of >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The median latency periods at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation were 7 days (interquartile range, 4-23) and 8 days (interquartile range, 4-13). In preeclampsia with severe features, neonatal survival rates were 44% (95% confidence interval, 3%-85%) at 22 weeks of gestation and 29% (95% confidence interval, 1%-56%) at 23 weeks of gestation. There were 2 cases of acute kidney injury (7%) and 2 cases of pericardial or pleural effusions (7%). Overall perinatal survival at <24 weeks of gestation was 30% in our current study vs 7% in previous reports (P=.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For cases of expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation, our findings showed an increased perinatal survival rate with decreased maternal morbidity compared with previously published data. This information may be used when counseling on expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"212.e1-212.e8"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140850071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validity of a Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn for identifying neonatal morbidity. 德尔菲共识中新生儿生长受限的定义在确定新生儿发病率方面的有效性。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.033
Isabelle Monier, Anne Ego, Alice Hocquette, Alexandra Benachi, Francois Goffinet, Nathalie Lelong, Camille Le Ray, Jennifer Zeitlin
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small for gestational age is defined as a birthweight below a birthweight percentile threshold, usually the 10th percentile, with the third or fifth percentile used to identify severe small for gestational age. Small for gestational age is used as a proxy for growth restriction in the newborn, but small-for-gestational-age newborns can be physiologically small and healthy. In addition, this definition excludes growth-restricted newborns who have weights more than the 10th percentile. To address these limits, a Delphi study developed a new consensus definition of growth restriction in newborns on the basis of neonatal anthropometric and clinical parameters, but it has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of growth restriction in the newborn according to the Delphi consensus definition and to investigate associated morbidity risks compared with definitions of Small for gestational age using birthweight percentile thresholds.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Data come from the 2016 and 2021 French National Perinatal Surveys, which include all births ≥22 weeks and/or with birthweights ≥500 g in all maternity units in France over 1 week. Data are collected from medical records and interviews with mothers after the delivery. The study population included 23,897 liveborn singleton births. The Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction was birthweight less than third percentile or at least 3 of the following criteria: birthweight, head circumference or length <10th percentile, antenatal diagnosis of growth restriction, or maternal hypertension. A composite of neonatal morbidity at birth, defined as 5-minute Apgar score <7, cord arterial pH <7.10, resuscitation and/or neonatal admission, was compared using the Delphi definition and usual birthweight percentile thresholds for defining small for gestational age using the following birthweight percentile groups: less than a third, third to fourth, and fifth to ninth percentiles. Relative risks were adjusted for maternal characteristics (age, parity, body mass index, smoking, educational level, preexisting hypertension and diabetes, and study year) and then for the consensus definition and birthweight percentile groups. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Analyses were carried out in the overall sample and among term and preterm newborns separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified that 4.9% (95% confidence intervals, 4.6-5.2) of newborns had growth restriction. Of these infants, 29.7% experienced morbidity, yielding an adjusted relative risk of 2.5 (95% confidence intervals, 2.2-2.7) compared with newborns without growth restriction. Compared with birthweight ≥10th percentile, morbidity risks were higher for low birthweight percentiles (less than third percentile: adjusted relative risk, 3.3 [95% confidence intervals, 3.0-3.7]; third to fourth percentile: relative risk, 1.4
背景:小于胎龄(SGA)的定义是出生体重低于出生体重百分位数的临界值,通常是第 10 个百分位数,第 3 或第 5 个百分位数用于识别严重 SGA。SGA 是新生儿生长受限的代名词,但 SGA 新生儿在生理上可能是小而健康的。该定义还排除了体重超过第 10 百分位数的生长受限新生儿。为了解决这些限制,一项德尔菲研究根据新生儿人体测量和临床参数制定了新生儿生长受限的新共识定义,但尚未对其进行评估:目的:根据德尔菲共识定义评估新生儿生长受限的发生率,并与使用出生体重百分位数阈值的 SGA 定义相比,调查相关的发病风险:数据来源于2016年和2021年法国全国围产期调查,该调查包括法国所有产科医院一周内出生周数≥22周和/或出生体重≥500克的所有新生儿。数据来自医疗记录和产后对母亲的访谈。研究对象包括 23,897 名活产单胎婴儿。德尔菲共识对生长受限的定义是出生体重 rd 百分位数或至少符合以下 3 个标准:出生体重、头围或身长 th 百分位数、产前诊断为生长受限或产妇高血压。新生儿出生时的综合发病率,定义为 5 分钟阿普加评分 rd、第 3-4 和第 5-9 百分位数。根据产妇特征(年龄、胎次、体重指数、吸烟、教育程度、原有高血压和糖尿病以及研究年份),然后根据共识定义和出生体重百分位数组调整相对风险(aRR)。采用连锁方程进行多重估算,以弥补缺失数据。对总体样本以及足月儿和早产儿新生儿分别进行了分析:结果:4.9%(95% 置信区间:4.6-5.2)的新生儿被确认为生长受限,其中 29.7% 的新生儿发病,与无生长受限的新生儿相比,aRR 为 2.5(95% 置信区间:2.2-2.7)。与出生体重≥10百分位数的新生儿相比,低出生体重百分位数的新生儿发病风险更高(rd aRR=3.3 (95%CI: 3.0-3.7), 3rd-4th RR=1.4 (95%CI:1.1-1.7), 5th-9th RR=1.4, (95%CI:1.2-1.6) )。在包括生长受限定义和出生体重百分位数组别的调整模型中,不包括出生体重rd百分位数(两种定义都包括rd百分位数),出生体重在第3-4百分位数(aRR=1.4,95%CI:1.1-1.7)和第5-9百分位数(aRR=1.4,95%CI:1.2-1.6)的发病风险仍然较高,但德尔菲定义的生长受限的发病风险不高(aRR=0.9,95%CI:0.7-1.2)。足月儿和早产儿的情况类似:结论:德尔菲共识的生长受限定义并不比基于出生体重百分位数的 SGA 定义能识别出更多的发病新生儿。这些发现说明了在临床实践中采用德尔菲共识研究结果之前对其进行评估的重要性。
{"title":"Validity of a Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn for identifying neonatal morbidity.","authors":"Isabelle Monier, Anne Ego, Alice Hocquette, Alexandra Benachi, Francois Goffinet, Nathalie Lelong, Camille Le Ray, Jennifer Zeitlin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.033","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Small for gestational age is defined as a birthweight below a birthweight percentile threshold, usually the 10th percentile, with the third or fifth percentile used to identify severe small for gestational age. Small for gestational age is used as a proxy for growth restriction in the newborn, but small-for-gestational-age newborns can be physiologically small and healthy. In addition, this definition excludes growth-restricted newborns who have weights more than the 10th percentile. To address these limits, a Delphi study developed a new consensus definition of growth restriction in newborns on the basis of neonatal anthropometric and clinical parameters, but it has not been evaluated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the prevalence of growth restriction in the newborn according to the Delphi consensus definition and to investigate associated morbidity risks compared with definitions of Small for gestational age using birthweight percentile thresholds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study design: &lt;/strong&gt;Data come from the 2016 and 2021 French National Perinatal Surveys, which include all births ≥22 weeks and/or with birthweights ≥500 g in all maternity units in France over 1 week. Data are collected from medical records and interviews with mothers after the delivery. The study population included 23,897 liveborn singleton births. The Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction was birthweight less than third percentile or at least 3 of the following criteria: birthweight, head circumference or length &lt;10th percentile, antenatal diagnosis of growth restriction, or maternal hypertension. A composite of neonatal morbidity at birth, defined as 5-minute Apgar score &lt;7, cord arterial pH &lt;7.10, resuscitation and/or neonatal admission, was compared using the Delphi definition and usual birthweight percentile thresholds for defining small for gestational age using the following birthweight percentile groups: less than a third, third to fourth, and fifth to ninth percentiles. Relative risks were adjusted for maternal characteristics (age, parity, body mass index, smoking, educational level, preexisting hypertension and diabetes, and study year) and then for the consensus definition and birthweight percentile groups. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Analyses were carried out in the overall sample and among term and preterm newborns separately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;We identified that 4.9% (95% confidence intervals, 4.6-5.2) of newborns had growth restriction. Of these infants, 29.7% experienced morbidity, yielding an adjusted relative risk of 2.5 (95% confidence intervals, 2.2-2.7) compared with newborns without growth restriction. Compared with birthweight ≥10th percentile, morbidity risks were higher for low birthweight percentiles (less than third percentile: adjusted relative risk, 3.3 [95% confidence intervals, 3.0-3.7]; third to fourth percentile: relative risk, 1.4 ","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"224.e1-224.e13"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140850314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Racial disparities in maternal health. 孕产妇健康中的种族差异。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.013
Emily D S Hales, Amy K Ferketich, Mark A Klebanoff
{"title":"Racial disparities in maternal health.","authors":"Emily D S Hales, Amy K Ferketich, Mark A Klebanoff","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost of ovarian cancer by the phase of care in the United States. 美国按治疗阶段划分的卵巢癌费用。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.023
Naomi N Adjei, Allen M Haas, Charlotte C Sun, Hui Zhao, Paul G Yeh, Sharon H Giordano, Iakovos Toumazis, Larissa A Meyer

Background: Ovarian cancer is associated with delayed diagnosis and poor survival; thus, interest is high in identifying predictive and prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic agents. Although the costs of ovarian cancer care are likely to increase as newer, more effective, but more expensive treatment regimens become available, information on the current costs of care for ovarian cancer-across the care continuum from diagnosis to the end of life-are lacking.

Objective: This study aimed to estimate real-world mean and median costs of ovarian cancer care within the first 5 years after diagnosis by patients' phase of care, age, race/ethnicity, and geographic region.

Study design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of ovarian cancer patients diagnosed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. We used claims data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database, which includes inpatient, outpatient, and prescription claims for commercial insurance and Medicare beneficiaries nationwide. Cost of ovarian cancer care were calculated for the start of care (ie, the first 6 months), continuing care (ie, period between the initial and end-of-life care), and end-of-life care (ie, the last 6 months) phases and reported in 2021 U.S. dollar amounts. Ovarian cancer care costs were stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and geographic region. Due to the skewed nature of cost data, the mean cost data were log-transformed for modeling. Ordinary least-squares regression was conducted on the log costs, adjusting for patient categorical age, race/ethnicity, and geographic region.

Results: A total of 7913 patients were included in the analysis. The mean cost per year for ovarian cancer care was >$200,000 during the start of care, between $26,000 and $88,000 during the continuing care phase, and >$129,000 during the end-of-life care phase. There were statistically significant associations between age and costs during each phase of care. Compared to younger patients, older patients incurred higher costs during the continuing care phase and lower costs during the end-of-life care phase. Geographic differences in the costs of ovarian cancer care were also noted regardless of the phase of care. There were no associations between cost and race/ethnicity in our cohort.

Conclusion: Ovarian cancer care costs are substantial and vary by the phase of care, age category, and geographic region. As more effective but expensive treatment options for ovarian cancer become available with potential survival benefit, sustainable interventions to reduce the cost of care for ovarian cancer will be needed throughout the cancer care continuum.

背景:卵巢癌与诊断延迟和生存率低有关;因此,人们对确定预测和预后生物标志物及新型治疗药物的兴趣很高。虽然随着更新、更有效但更昂贵的治疗方案的出现,卵巢癌的治疗成本可能会增加,但目前缺乏从诊断到生命终结的整个治疗过程中卵巢癌治疗成本的信息:本研究旨在按患者的治疗阶段、年龄、种族/民族和地理区域估算卵巢癌确诊后前 5 年的实际平均和中位治疗费用:我们对 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间确诊的卵巢癌患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们使用的理赔数据来自 Optum 的去标识化 Clinformatics® Data Mart 数据库,其中包括全国范围内商业保险和医疗保险受益人的住院、门诊和处方理赔数据。卵巢癌护理成本按护理开始阶段(即前 6 个月)、持续护理阶段(即初始护理与生命终结护理之间的阶段)和生命终结护理阶段(即最后 6 个月)计算,并以 2021 美元的金额报告。卵巢癌护理成本按年龄、种族/人种和地理区域进行了分层。由于成本数据具有偏斜性,因此在建模时对平均成本数据进行了对数变换。对成本对数进行普通最小二乘法回归,并对患者的分类年龄、种族/人种和地理区域进行调整:共有 7913 名患者纳入分析。卵巢癌护理的每年平均费用在护理开始阶段>20万美元,在持续护理阶段介于2.6万美元至8.8万美元之间,在生命终结护理阶段>12.9万美元。在每个护理阶段,年龄与费用之间都存在统计学意义上的重大关联。与年轻患者相比,老年患者在持续护理阶段的费用较高,而在临终护理阶段的费用较低。无论护理阶段如何,卵巢癌护理成本也存在地域差异。在我们的队列中,成本与种族/人种之间没有关联:结论:卵巢癌的治疗费用很高,而且因治疗阶段、年龄段和地理区域而异。由于卵巢癌的治疗方法越来越有效,但费用也越来越高,而且可能会对患者的生存带来益处,因此需要在整个癌症治疗过程中采取可持续的干预措施来降低卵巢癌的治疗费用。
{"title":"Cost of ovarian cancer by the phase of care in the United States.","authors":"Naomi N Adjei, Allen M Haas, Charlotte C Sun, Hui Zhao, Paul G Yeh, Sharon H Giordano, Iakovos Toumazis, Larissa A Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer is associated with delayed diagnosis and poor survival; thus, interest is high in identifying predictive and prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic agents. Although the costs of ovarian cancer care are likely to increase as newer, more effective, but more expensive treatment regimens become available, information on the current costs of care for ovarian cancer-across the care continuum from diagnosis to the end of life-are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to estimate real-world mean and median costs of ovarian cancer care within the first 5 years after diagnosis by patients' phase of care, age, race/ethnicity, and geographic region.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of ovarian cancer patients diagnosed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. We used claims data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database, which includes inpatient, outpatient, and prescription claims for commercial insurance and Medicare beneficiaries nationwide. Cost of ovarian cancer care were calculated for the start of care (ie, the first 6 months), continuing care (ie, period between the initial and end-of-life care), and end-of-life care (ie, the last 6 months) phases and reported in 2021 U.S. dollar amounts. Ovarian cancer care costs were stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and geographic region. Due to the skewed nature of cost data, the mean cost data were log-transformed for modeling. Ordinary least-squares regression was conducted on the log costs, adjusting for patient categorical age, race/ethnicity, and geographic region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7913 patients were included in the analysis. The mean cost per year for ovarian cancer care was >$200,000 during the start of care, between $26,000 and $88,000 during the continuing care phase, and >$129,000 during the end-of-life care phase. There were statistically significant associations between age and costs during each phase of care. Compared to younger patients, older patients incurred higher costs during the continuing care phase and lower costs during the end-of-life care phase. Geographic differences in the costs of ovarian cancer care were also noted regardless of the phase of care. There were no associations between cost and race/ethnicity in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ovarian cancer care costs are substantial and vary by the phase of care, age category, and geographic region. As more effective but expensive treatment options for ovarian cancer become available with potential survival benefit, sustainable interventions to reduce the cost of care for ovarian cancer will be needed throughout the cancer care continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"204.e1-204.e13"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142003387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive reflections on first-trimester anomaly scan implementation in the Dutch national screening program. 荷兰国家筛查计划中实施 FTAS 的综合思考。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.034
Meng Ding, Chenyu Chi
{"title":"Comprehensive reflections on first-trimester anomaly scan implementation in the Dutch national screening program.","authors":"Meng Ding, Chenyu Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.034","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e79"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Performance of first-trimester anomaly scan. 第一胎异常扫描的性能。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.032
Eline E R Lust, Kim Bronsgeest, Monique C Haak, Mireille N Bekker
{"title":"Performance of first-trimester anomaly scan.","authors":"Eline E R Lust, Kim Bronsgeest, Monique C Haak, Mireille N Bekker","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e74"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142091391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Performance of first-trimester fetal anomaly scan: not just high sensitivity. 产前胎儿异常扫描的性能:不仅仅是高灵敏度。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.031
Li Zhen, Dong-Zhi Li
{"title":"Performance of first-trimester fetal anomaly scan: not just high sensitivity.","authors":"Li Zhen, Dong-Zhi Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e72-e73"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142091392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is there evidence that decreased maternal activity increases fetal growth? 是否有证据表明母体活动减少会促进胎儿生长?
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.112
Greggory R DeVore, Bardo Polanco, Wesley Lee, Jeffrey Brian Fowlkes, Emma E Peek, Manesha Putra, John C Hobbins
{"title":"Is there evidence that decreased maternal activity increases fetal growth?","authors":"Greggory R DeVore, Bardo Polanco, Wesley Lee, Jeffrey Brian Fowlkes, Emma E Peek, Manesha Putra, John C Hobbins","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.112","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e57-e60"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142363973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reduced number of regulatory T cells in maternal circulation precede idiopathic spontaneous preterm labor in a subset of patients. 减少数量的调节性T细胞在母体循环先于特发性自发性早产患者的一个子集。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.001
Michal Koucky, Zdenek Lastuvka, Helena Koprivova, Tereza Cindrova-Davies, Jiri Hrdy, Karin Cerna, Pavel Calda

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that spontaneous preterm labor is a syndrome caused by multiple pathological processes. The breakdown of maternal-fetal tolerance has been proposed as a key mechanism of idiopathic spontaneous preterm labor, often viewed as a chronic inflammatory process resulting from the maternal immune system's impaired tolerance of the fetus from early pregnancy. Regulatory T cells are crucial for maintaining maternal-fetal tolerance. Even a partial reduction in their levels can disrupt this tolerance, leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm labor. Given the complexity of the T lymphocyte-mediated immune response, identifying candidate signaling pathways involved in maternal-fetal tolerance is challenging. However, current literature highlights the importance of the functional and developmental markers FoxP3, CD45RA, Helios, and CD39 due to their immunosuppressive abilities essential for maintaining pregnancy.

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether changes in numbers of selected regulatory T cell subpopulations in the first trimester are associated with subsequent spontaneous preterm labor.

Study design: This prospective study enrolled 43 women with early singleton pregnancies, excluding those with autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus (type 1, type 2), primary hypertension, or who had been treated with vaginal progesterone prior to sample collection. We analyzed regulatory T cell subpopulations in maternal circulation using the DURAClone IM T cell kit, focusing on the following subsets: CD4+CD25+FoxP3+, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+, and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39-.

Results: Among the participants, 7 experienced spontaneous preterm labor between the 23rd and 33rd weeks of gestation, while 36 delivered at term. The preterm group showed a significant reduction in numbers of all analyzed regulatory T cell subpopulations: CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ (median 0.0410×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0550×10ˆ9/L, P=.0217), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA- (median 0.0310×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0420×10ˆ9/L, P=.0216), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+ (median 0.0270×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0370×10ˆ9/L, P=.0260), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39- (median 0.0300×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0420×10ˆ9/L, P=.0427).

Conclusion: Early first trimester alterations in specific regulatory T cell subpopulations, including diminished levels of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA-, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+, and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39-, are associated with idiopathic spontaneous preterm labor. These findings suggest that early changes in these lymphocyte subpopulations may be linked to spontaneous preterm birth. This highlights the need for further research to understand the mechanisms underlying regulatory T-cell dynamics and their impact on pregnancy outcomes.

背景:越来越多的证据表明自发性早产是一种由多种病理过程引起的综合征。母体-胎儿耐受性的破坏被认为是特发性自发性早产的一个关键机制,通常被认为是由于母体免疫系统在妊娠早期对胎儿的耐受性受损而导致的慢性炎症过程。调节性T细胞对维持母胎耐受性至关重要。即使它们水平的部分降低也会破坏这种耐受性,导致不良的妊娠结果,如早产。鉴于T淋巴细胞介导的免疫反应的复杂性,确定参与母胎耐受的候选信号通路是具有挑战性的。然而,目前的文献强调了功能和发育标记FoxP3、CD45RA、Helios和CD39的重要性,因为它们的免疫抑制能力对维持妊娠至关重要。目的:本研究旨在确定妊娠早期选择性调节性T细胞亚群数量的变化是否与随后的自发性早产有关。研究设计:这项前瞻性研究纳入了43名早期单胎妊娠的妇女,排除了那些患有自身免疫性疾病、糖尿病(1型、2型)、原发性高血压或在样本采集前接受过阴道孕酮治疗的妇女。我们使用DURAClone IM T细胞试剂盒分析了母体循环中的调节性T细胞亚群,重点关注以下亚群:CD4+CD25+FoxP3+, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+和CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39-。结果:7例在妊娠23 ~ 33周发生自然早产,36例足月分娩。早产组显示所有分析的调节性T细胞亚群的数量显著减少:CD4+CD25+FoxP3+(中位数0.0410×10º9/L vs中位数0.0550×10º9/L, P= 0.0217), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA-(中位数0.0310×10º9/L vs中位数0.0420×10º9/L, P= 0.0216), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+(中位数0.0270×10º9/L vs中位数0.0370×10º9/L, P= 0.0260), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39-(中位数0.0300×10º9/L vs中位数0.0420×10º9/L, P= 0.0427)。结论:孕早期特异性调节性T细胞亚群的改变,包括CD4+CD25+FoxP3+、CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA-、CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+和CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39-水平的降低,与特发性自发性早产有关。这些发现表明,这些淋巴细胞亚群的早期变化可能与自发性早产有关。这突出了进一步研究的必要性,以了解调节t细胞动力学的机制及其对妊娠结局的影响。
{"title":"Reduced number of regulatory T cells in maternal circulation precede idiopathic spontaneous preterm labor in a subset of patients.","authors":"Michal Koucky, Zdenek Lastuvka, Helena Koprivova, Tereza Cindrova-Davies, Jiri Hrdy, Karin Cerna, Pavel Calda","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accumulating evidence suggests that spontaneous preterm labor is a syndrome caused by multiple pathological processes. The breakdown of maternal-fetal tolerance has been proposed as a key mechanism of idiopathic spontaneous preterm labor, often viewed as a chronic inflammatory process resulting from the maternal immune system's impaired tolerance of the fetus from early pregnancy. Regulatory T cells are crucial for maintaining maternal-fetal tolerance. Even a partial reduction in their levels can disrupt this tolerance, leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm labor. Given the complexity of the T lymphocyte-mediated immune response, identifying candidate signaling pathways involved in maternal-fetal tolerance is challenging. However, current literature highlights the importance of the functional and developmental markers FoxP3, CD45RA, Helios, and CD39 due to their immunosuppressive abilities essential for maintaining pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether changes in numbers of selected regulatory T cell subpopulations in the first trimester are associated with subsequent spontaneous preterm labor.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 43 women with early singleton pregnancies, excluding those with autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus (type 1, type 2), primary hypertension, or who had been treated with vaginal progesterone prior to sample collection. We analyzed regulatory T cell subpopulations in maternal circulation using the DURAClone IM T cell kit, focusing on the following subsets: CD4+CD25+FoxP3+, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+, and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39-.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the participants, 7 experienced spontaneous preterm labor between the 23rd and 33rd weeks of gestation, while 36 delivered at term. The preterm group showed a significant reduction in numbers of all analyzed regulatory T cell subpopulations: CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ (median 0.0410×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0550×10ˆ9/L, P=.0217), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA- (median 0.0310×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0420×10ˆ9/L, P=.0216), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+ (median 0.0270×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0370×10ˆ9/L, P=.0260), CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39- (median 0.0300×10ˆ9/L vs median 0.0420×10ˆ9/L, P=.0427).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early first trimester alterations in specific regulatory T cell subpopulations, including diminished levels of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD45RA-, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Helios+, and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD39-, are associated with idiopathic spontaneous preterm labor. These findings suggest that early changes in these lymphocyte subpopulations may be linked to spontaneous preterm birth. This highlights the need for further research to understand the mechanisms underlying regulatory T-cell dynamics and their impact on pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"222.e1-222.e11"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Obstetric violence is not a misnomer. 产科暴力并非名不副实。
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.012
Meesha Vullikanti, Alica Ely Yamin
{"title":"Obstetric violence is not a misnomer.","authors":"Meesha Vullikanti, Alica Ely Yamin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e51"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141615736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1