Access to community-based eye services in Meru, Kenya: a cross-sectional equity analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1186/s12939-024-02244-x
Luke N Allen, Sarah Karanja, Michael Gichangi, Cosmas Bunywera, Hillary Rono, David Macleod, Min Jung Kim, Malebogo Tlhajoane, Matthew J Burton, Jacqueline Ramke, Nigel M Bolster, Andrew Bastawrous
{"title":"Access to community-based eye services in Meru, Kenya: a cross-sectional equity analysis.","authors":"Luke N Allen, Sarah Karanja, Michael Gichangi, Cosmas Bunywera, Hillary Rono, David Macleod, Min Jung Kim, Malebogo Tlhajoane, Matthew J Burton, Jacqueline Ramke, Nigel M Bolster, Andrew Bastawrous","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02244-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 80% of blindness in Kenya is due to curable or preventable causes and 7.5 m Kenyans currently need eye services. Embedding sociodemographic data collection into screening programmes could help identify the groups facing systematic barriers to care. We aimed to determine the sociodemographic characteristics that were associated with access among patients diagnosed with an eye problem and referred for treatment in the Vision Impact Programme, currently operating in Meru County.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used an embedded, pragmatic, cross-sectional design. A list of sociodemographic questions was developed with input from key stakeholders. The final question set included the following domains: age, gender, religion, marital status, disability, education, occupation, income, housing, assets, and health insurance. These were integrated into an app that is used to screen, refer, and check-in (register) participants within a major eye screening programme. We gathered data from 4,240 people who screened positive and were referred to their local outreach treatment clinic. We used logistic regression to identify which groups were facing the greatest barriers to accessing care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A quarter of those screened between April - July 2023 were found to have an eye problem and were referred, however only 46% of these people were able to access care. In our fully adjusted model, at the 0.05 level there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of attendance within the domains of disability, health insurance, housing, income, or religion. Strong evidence (p < 0.001) was found of an association between access and age, gender, and occupation; with males, younger adults, and those working in sales, services and manual jobs the least likely to receive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to essential eye services is low and unequal in Meru, with less than a third of those aged 18-44 receiving the care they need. Future work should explore the specific barriers faced by this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02244-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over 80% of blindness in Kenya is due to curable or preventable causes and 7.5 m Kenyans currently need eye services. Embedding sociodemographic data collection into screening programmes could help identify the groups facing systematic barriers to care. We aimed to determine the sociodemographic characteristics that were associated with access among patients diagnosed with an eye problem and referred for treatment in the Vision Impact Programme, currently operating in Meru County.

Method: We used an embedded, pragmatic, cross-sectional design. A list of sociodemographic questions was developed with input from key stakeholders. The final question set included the following domains: age, gender, religion, marital status, disability, education, occupation, income, housing, assets, and health insurance. These were integrated into an app that is used to screen, refer, and check-in (register) participants within a major eye screening programme. We gathered data from 4,240 people who screened positive and were referred to their local outreach treatment clinic. We used logistic regression to identify which groups were facing the greatest barriers to accessing care.

Results: A quarter of those screened between April - July 2023 were found to have an eye problem and were referred, however only 46% of these people were able to access care. In our fully adjusted model, at the 0.05 level there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of attendance within the domains of disability, health insurance, housing, income, or religion. Strong evidence (p < 0.001) was found of an association between access and age, gender, and occupation; with males, younger adults, and those working in sales, services and manual jobs the least likely to receive care.

Conclusions: Access to essential eye services is low and unequal in Meru, with less than a third of those aged 18-44 receiving the care they need. Future work should explore the specific barriers faced by this group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚梅鲁的社区眼科服务:横断面公平分析。
背景:在肯尼亚,超过 80% 的失明是由于可治愈或可预防的原因造成的,目前有 750 万肯尼亚人需要眼科服务。将社会人口学数据收集纳入筛查计划有助于确定哪些群体在接受治疗时面临系统性障碍。我们的目的是确定与目前在梅鲁县开展的 "视觉影响计划 "中被诊断出有眼疾并转诊治疗的患者接受治疗有关的社会人口特征:我们采用了嵌入式、务实、横断面设计。在征求主要利益相关者的意见后,我们制定了一份社会人口学问题清单。最终的问题集包括以下方面:年龄、性别、宗教、婚姻状况、残疾、教育、职业、收入、住房、资产和医疗保险。这些问题被整合到一个应用程序中,该应用程序用于在一个大型眼科筛查项目中对参与者进行筛查、转介和签到(登记)。我们收集了 4240 名筛查结果呈阳性并被转诊到当地外展治疗诊所的患者的数据。我们使用逻辑回归法来确定哪些群体在接受治疗时面临最大的障碍:在 2023 年 4 月至 7 月期间接受筛查的人中,有四分之一被发现患有眼疾并被转诊,但其中只有 46% 的人能够获得治疗。在我们的完全调整模型中,在 0.05 的水平上,残疾、医疗保险、住房、收入或宗教等领域的就诊几率没有明显的统计学差异。有力证据(p 结论:在梅鲁,获得基本眼科服务的机会很少且不平等,18-44 岁的人群中只有不到三分之一的人获得了所需的护理。今后的工作应探讨这一群体面临的具体障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Layers of inequality: gender, medicalisation and obstetric violence in Ghana. "They pulled that funding away and we're not recovering. it's getting worse": deaths of despair in post-austerity north east England. A hill tribe community advisory board in Northern Thailand: lessons learned one year on. Unpacking occupational and sex divides to understand the moderate progress in life expectancy in recent years (France, 2010's). Correction: Making health inequality analysis accessible: WHO tools and resources using Microsoft Excel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1