A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home-based Virtual Rehabilitation to Improve Adherence to Prescribed Home Therapy After Burn Injury: A Northwest Regional Burn Model System Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae166
Stephen H Sibbett, Gretchen J Carrougher, Caitlin M Orton, Jody I Sabel, Tonya Terken, Andrew Humbert, Aaron Bunnell, Nicole S Gibran, Tam N Pham, Barclay T Stewart
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home-based Virtual Rehabilitation to Improve Adherence to Prescribed Home Therapy After Burn Injury: A Northwest Regional Burn Model System Trial.","authors":"Stephen H Sibbett, Gretchen J Carrougher, Caitlin M Orton, Jody I Sabel, Tonya Terken, Andrew Humbert, Aaron Bunnell, Nicole S Gibran, Tam N Pham, Barclay T Stewart","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily rehabilitation after burn injury is vital for the prevention of function-limiting contractures. However, adherence to prescribed therapy following acute burn hospitalization has historically been low and not well-studied. Studies involving virtual reality technology have demonstrated an association with improved functional outcomes in burn therapy. We conducted a 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing 12 weeks of a home-based virtual rehabilitation (HBVR) system with standard burn therapy. Our primary outcome was adherence to prescribed home therapy, measured by e-diary self-report. Secondary outcomes included steps walked daily and patient-reported outcomes regarding stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility. We enrolled 50 subjects, of which 48 provided data for analysis (23 HBVR, 25 control). Overall adherence to prescribed home therapy was low, 37.2% in the HBVR group and 60.0% in the control group. Reasons for nonadherence in the HBVR group included lack of time, engagement, and replacement of therapy with other physical activity. However, some subjects enjoyed HBVR and believed it aided their recovery. There was no difference in daily steps walked between the 2 groups. Daily walking gradually improved from 3500 steps per day in the first week after baseline and plateaued at 6000 steps per day at week 5. There were no differences in stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility between the 2 groups at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Subjects demonstrated improved upper extremity function and mobility in the first year after discharge, which coincided with increasing stiffness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"197-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daily rehabilitation after burn injury is vital for the prevention of function-limiting contractures. However, adherence to prescribed therapy following acute burn hospitalization has historically been low and not well-studied. Studies involving virtual reality technology have demonstrated an association with improved functional outcomes in burn therapy. We conducted a 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing 12 weeks of a home-based virtual rehabilitation (HBVR) system with standard burn therapy. Our primary outcome was adherence to prescribed home therapy, measured by e-diary self-report. Secondary outcomes included steps walked daily and patient-reported outcomes regarding stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility. We enrolled 50 subjects, of which 48 provided data for analysis (23 HBVR, 25 control). Overall adherence to prescribed home therapy was low, 37.2% in the HBVR group and 60.0% in the control group. Reasons for nonadherence in the HBVR group included lack of time, engagement, and replacement of therapy with other physical activity. However, some subjects enjoyed HBVR and believed it aided their recovery. There was no difference in daily steps walked between the 2 groups. Daily walking gradually improved from 3500 steps per day in the first week after baseline and plateaued at 6000 steps per day at week 5. There were no differences in stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility between the 2 groups at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Subjects demonstrated improved upper extremity function and mobility in the first year after discharge, which coincided with increasing stiffness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于家庭虚拟康复的随机对照试验,以提高烧伤后家庭治疗处方的依从性:西北地区烧伤模型系统试验》。
烧伤后的日常康复对于预防功能受限性挛缩至关重要。然而,在急性烧伤住院治疗后,对处方治疗的依从性一直很低,而且研究也不充分。涉及虚拟现实技术的研究表明,虚拟现实技术与改善烧伤治疗的功能结果有关。我们进行了一项为期五年的随机对照试验,比较了为期 12 周的家庭虚拟康复(HBVR)系统与标准烧伤治疗。我们的主要结果是对规定的家庭治疗的依从性,通过电子日记自我报告来衡量。次要结果包括每天行走的步数以及患者报告的有关僵硬、上肢功能和活动能力的结果。我们招募了 50 名受试者,其中 48 人提供了分析数据(23 名 HBVR,25 名对照组)。对处方家庭治疗的总体依从性较低,HBVR 组为 37.2%,对照组为 60.0%。HBVR 组未坚持治疗的原因包括缺乏时间、参与度以及用其他体育活动代替治疗。不过,一些受试者喜欢 HBVR,并认为它有助于他们的康复。两组受试者每天行走的步数没有差异。每日步行从基线后第一周的每天 3,500 步逐渐增加,到第五周时稳定在每天 6,000 步。在基线、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的随访中,两组在僵硬度、上肢功能和活动能力方面没有差异。受试者在出院后第一年的上肢功能和活动能力有所改善,但与此同时,僵硬度也在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Burn center versus burn unit, which is better? Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and its Use in Burn Wounds: An Updated Systematic Review. Burn Progression in Human Skin - A Review of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research. Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review. Wildland Firefighters Suffer Increasing Risk of Job-Related Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1