Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/iraf011
Cameron Nelson, Isaac Weigel, Colette Galet, Lucy Wibbenmeyer, Alexander Kurjatko
{"title":"Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Cameron Nelson, Isaac Weigel, Colette Galet, Lucy Wibbenmeyer, Alexander Kurjatko","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unplanned extubation rates in burn patients were previously reported at 27% (3 cases per 100 ventilator days). As facial burns pose a unique challenge to tube securement, patients in our unit have surgically placed bite blocks to secure the endotracheal tube at the provider's discretion. Herein, we assessed unplanned extubation rates at our burn center. We performed a retrospective cohort study including burn patients who required mechanical ventilation from 7/01/2015 to 6/30/2023. Demographics, comorbidities, injuries, and hospital course information were collected and compared between patients who had an unplanned extubation and those who did not. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with unplanned extubation and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) complication. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Of 360 patients, 17 (4.7%) had unplanned extubations, representing 0.7 cases per 100 ventilator days. There were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or burn injury characteristics between groups. Patients with unplanned extubation were more likely to have an inhalation injury (70.6% vs. 42.6%, p=0.001), paCO2 ≥50 (70.6% vs. 39.1%, p=0.031), more ventilator days (6 [2-15] vs. 2 [1-4] days, p<0.001), and more hospital days (14 [8.5-25.5] vs. 8 [2-20], p=0.020). VAP rate tended to be higher in the unplanned extubation group (17.6% vs. 5.5%, p=0.077. On multivariate analysis, inhalation injury was associated with increased risk of unplanned extubation (Odds ratio (OR) = 4.68 [1.59-13.81], p=0.005). No patients with bite blocks had an unplanned extubation. Further study on the utility of advanced securement devices is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unplanned extubation rates in burn patients were previously reported at 27% (3 cases per 100 ventilator days). As facial burns pose a unique challenge to tube securement, patients in our unit have surgically placed bite blocks to secure the endotracheal tube at the provider's discretion. Herein, we assessed unplanned extubation rates at our burn center. We performed a retrospective cohort study including burn patients who required mechanical ventilation from 7/01/2015 to 6/30/2023. Demographics, comorbidities, injuries, and hospital course information were collected and compared between patients who had an unplanned extubation and those who did not. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with unplanned extubation and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) complication. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Of 360 patients, 17 (4.7%) had unplanned extubations, representing 0.7 cases per 100 ventilator days. There were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or burn injury characteristics between groups. Patients with unplanned extubation were more likely to have an inhalation injury (70.6% vs. 42.6%, p=0.001), paCO2 ≥50 (70.6% vs. 39.1%, p=0.031), more ventilator days (6 [2-15] vs. 2 [1-4] days, p<0.001), and more hospital days (14 [8.5-25.5] vs. 8 [2-20], p=0.020). VAP rate tended to be higher in the unplanned extubation group (17.6% vs. 5.5%, p=0.077. On multivariate analysis, inhalation injury was associated with increased risk of unplanned extubation (Odds ratio (OR) = 4.68 [1.59-13.81], p=0.005). No patients with bite blocks had an unplanned extubation. Further study on the utility of advanced securement devices is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review. Wildland Firefighters Suffer Increasing Risk of Job-Related Death. An Evaluation of Burn Fellowship Program Websites' Presence and Content. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix Application for Complex Wound Reconstruction. A Systematic Review of Simulation in Burn Care: Education, Assessment, and Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1