Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Occupational Health: A Systematic Literature Review.

Zaira S Chaudhry, Avishek Choudhury
{"title":"Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Occupational Health: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Zaira S Chaudhry, Avishek Choudhury","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of the study are to identify and to critically analyze studies using artificial intelligence (AI) in occupational health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant articles published in English between January 2014-January 2024. Quality was assessed with the validated APPRAISE-AI tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 27 included articles were categorized as follows: health risk assessment ( n = 17), return to work and disability duration ( n = 5), injury severity ( n = 3), and injury management ( n = 2). Forty-seven AI algorithms were utilized, with artificial neural networks, support vector machines, and random forest being most common. Model accuracy ranged from 0.60-0.99 and area under the curve (AUC) from 0.7-1.0. Most studies ( n = 15) were of moderate quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While AI has potential clinical utility in occupational health, explainable models that are rigorously validated in real-world settings are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"943-955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of the study are to identify and to critically analyze studies using artificial intelligence (AI) in occupational health.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant articles published in English between January 2014-January 2024. Quality was assessed with the validated APPRAISE-AI tool.

Results: The 27 included articles were categorized as follows: health risk assessment ( n = 17), return to work and disability duration ( n = 5), injury severity ( n = 3), and injury management ( n = 2). Forty-seven AI algorithms were utilized, with artificial neural networks, support vector machines, and random forest being most common. Model accuracy ranged from 0.60-0.99 and area under the curve (AUC) from 0.7-1.0. Most studies ( n = 15) were of moderate quality.

Conclusions: While AI has potential clinical utility in occupational health, explainable models that are rigorously validated in real-world settings are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在职业健康领域的临床应用:系统性文献综述。
目的识别并批判性分析在职业健康中使用人工智能(AI)的研究:方法:对PubMed、IEEE Xplore和Web of Science进行系统检索,以确定2014年1月至2024年1月期间发表的相关英文文章。采用经过验证的 APPRAISE-AI 工具对文章质量进行评估:纳入的 27 篇文章分类如下:健康风险评估(17 篇)、重返工作岗位和残疾持续时间(5 篇)、伤害严重程度(3 篇)和伤害管理(2 篇)。使用了 47 种人工智能算法,其中以人工神经网络、支持向量机和随机森林最为常见。模型准确率在 0.60-0.99 之间,AUC 在 0.7-1.0 之间。大多数研究(n = 15)质量中等:结论:虽然人工智能在职业健康领域具有潜在的临床实用性,但还需要在真实世界环境中经过严格验证的可解释模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating power into research, outreach, and practice to make the most of the next decade of the Total Worker Health® Program. Employment productivity and cancer-related psychological symptoms among adult cancer dyads. Is Well-being Associated with Burnout? From a Multi-center Cross-sectional Study in Taiwan. Interactive Workshop on Identifying Health Effects of Climate Change in the Clinical Setting: An Occupational and Environmental Health Solution. A cross-sectional analysis of acute injuries among U.S. Coast Guard responders to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1