Deep learning model for intravascular ultrasound image segmentation with temporal consistency.

Hyeonmin Kim, June-Goo Lee, Gyu-Jun Jeong, Geunyoung Lee, Hyunseok Min, Hyungjoo Cho, Daegyu Min, Seung-Whan Lee, Jun Hwan Cho, Sungsoo Cho, Soo-Jin Kang
{"title":"Deep learning model for intravascular ultrasound image segmentation with temporal consistency.","authors":"Hyeonmin Kim, June-Goo Lee, Gyu-Jun Jeong, Geunyoung Lee, Hyunseok Min, Hyungjoo Cho, Daegyu Min, Seung-Whan Lee, Jun Hwan Cho, Sungsoo Cho, Soo-Jin Kang","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03221-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to develop and validate a deep learning model for delineating intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of coronary arteries.Using a total of 1240 40-MHz IVUS pullbacks with 191,407 frames, the model for lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM) segmentation was developed. Both frame- and vessel-level performances and clinical impact of the model on 3-year cardiovascular events were evaluated in the independent data sets. In the test set, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were 0.966 ± 0.025 and 0.982 ± 0.017 for the lumen and EEM, respectively. Even at sites of extensive attenuation, the frame-level performance was excellent (DSCs > 0.96 for the lumen and EEM). The model (vs. the expert) showed a better temporal consistency for contouring the EEM. The agreement between the model- vs. the expert-derived cross-sectional and volumetric measurements was excellent in the independent retrospective cohort (all, intra-class coefficients > 0.94). The model-derived percent atheroma volume > 52.5% (area under curve 0.70, sensitivity 71% and specificity 67%) and plaque burden at the minimal lumen area site (area under curve 0.72, sensitivity 72% and specificity 66%) best predicted 3-year cardiac death and nonculprit-related target vessel revascularization, respectively. In the stented segment, the DSCs > 0.96 for contouring lumen and EEM were achieved. Applied to the 60-MHz IVUS images, the DSCs were > 0.97. In the external cohort with 45-MHz IVUS, the DSCs were > 0.96. The deep learning model accurately delineated vascular geometry, which may be cost-saving and support clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2283-2292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03221-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop and validate a deep learning model for delineating intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of coronary arteries.Using a total of 1240 40-MHz IVUS pullbacks with 191,407 frames, the model for lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM) segmentation was developed. Both frame- and vessel-level performances and clinical impact of the model on 3-year cardiovascular events were evaluated in the independent data sets. In the test set, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were 0.966 ± 0.025 and 0.982 ± 0.017 for the lumen and EEM, respectively. Even at sites of extensive attenuation, the frame-level performance was excellent (DSCs > 0.96 for the lumen and EEM). The model (vs. the expert) showed a better temporal consistency for contouring the EEM. The agreement between the model- vs. the expert-derived cross-sectional and volumetric measurements was excellent in the independent retrospective cohort (all, intra-class coefficients > 0.94). The model-derived percent atheroma volume > 52.5% (area under curve 0.70, sensitivity 71% and specificity 67%) and plaque burden at the minimal lumen area site (area under curve 0.72, sensitivity 72% and specificity 66%) best predicted 3-year cardiac death and nonculprit-related target vessel revascularization, respectively. In the stented segment, the DSCs > 0.96 for contouring lumen and EEM were achieved. Applied to the 60-MHz IVUS images, the DSCs were > 0.97. In the external cohort with 45-MHz IVUS, the DSCs were > 0.96. The deep learning model accurately delineated vascular geometry, which may be cost-saving and support clinical decision-making.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有时间一致性的血管内超声图像分割深度学习模型。
这项研究旨在开发和验证一种用于冠状动脉血管内超声(IVUS)图像分界的深度学习模型。利用总共1240个40兆赫IVUS回放和191,407个帧,开发了用于管腔和外部弹性膜(EEM)分割的模型。在独立数据集中评估了该模型在帧和血管层面的性能以及对3年心血管事件的临床影响。在测试集中,管腔和 EEM 的 Dice 相似系数 (DSC) 分别为 0.966 ± 0.025 和 0.982 ± 0.017。即使在广泛衰减的部位,帧级性能也非常出色(管腔和 EEM 的 DSCs > 0.96)。在绘制 EEM 的轮廓时,模型(与专家相比)显示出更好的时间一致性。在独立的回顾性队列中,模型与专家得出的横截面和容积测量值之间的一致性非常好(所有测量值的类内系数均大于 0.94)。模型得出的动脉粥样斑块体积百分比 > 52.5%(曲线下面积 0.70,灵敏度 71%,特异度 67%)和最小管腔面积部位的斑块负荷(曲线下面积 0.72,灵敏度 72%,特异度 66%)分别是 3 年心源性死亡和非斑块相关靶血管血运重建的最佳预测指标。在支架段,轮廓管腔和 EEM 的 DSC 均大于 0.96。应用 60-MHz IVUS 图像时,DSCs > 0.97。在使用 45-MHz IVUS 的外部队列中,DSC 均大于 0.96。深度学习模型准确地勾勒出了血管的几何形状,这可能会节约成本并支持临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and structure by ultrasound radiomics in acute and chronic coronary patients. Redundant and aneurysmal interatrial septum motion: a commentary on anatomical factors and clinical implications. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR. When a common sore throat unmasks a rare disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1