Analysis of user acceptance of information and communications technology for electrical safety inspection based on a choice experiment and hierarchical Bayesian model

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123688
{"title":"Analysis of user acceptance of information and communications technology for electrical safety inspection based on a choice experiment and hierarchical Bayesian model","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The development of information and communications technology has resulted in changes in electrical safety inspection. Electrical safety inspectors plan to introduce smart devices that detect causes of extensive electrical fires in real time without problems of power disconnections and on-site visits. However, smart inspection is expected to encounter acceptance issues because users are unaccustomed to it and obligated to pay additional costs for device installation and data communications. This study aims to investigate smart inspection acceptance using survey data. A hierarchical Bayesian model is employed to explore the effects of users' characteristics on its acceptance. The respondents prefer attributes of smart inspection to those of the prevailing method of on-site inspection, excluding monthly inspection costs. They prefer more frequent and extensive inspections, and prefer to avoid power disconnections and physical interaction. Accordingly, the government should inform users that smart inspection is convenient and accurate. It is also attractive to users who wish to avoid on-site visits because of privacy issues. The acceptance rate can increase if the government reduces inspection costs using the existing smart devices and communications infrastructure, and offers real-time electrical safety information using smart phones and in-home displays.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524004864","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of information and communications technology has resulted in changes in electrical safety inspection. Electrical safety inspectors plan to introduce smart devices that detect causes of extensive electrical fires in real time without problems of power disconnections and on-site visits. However, smart inspection is expected to encounter acceptance issues because users are unaccustomed to it and obligated to pay additional costs for device installation and data communications. This study aims to investigate smart inspection acceptance using survey data. A hierarchical Bayesian model is employed to explore the effects of users' characteristics on its acceptance. The respondents prefer attributes of smart inspection to those of the prevailing method of on-site inspection, excluding monthly inspection costs. They prefer more frequent and extensive inspections, and prefer to avoid power disconnections and physical interaction. Accordingly, the government should inform users that smart inspection is convenient and accurate. It is also attractive to users who wish to avoid on-site visits because of privacy issues. The acceptance rate can increase if the government reduces inspection costs using the existing smart devices and communications infrastructure, and offers real-time electrical safety information using smart phones and in-home displays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于选择实验和层次贝叶斯模型的用户对用于电气安全检查的信息和通信技术的接受程度分析
信息和通信技术的发展使电气安全检查发生了变化。电气安全检查人员计划引进智能设备,实时检测大面积电气火灾的原因,而无需断电和实地考察。然而,智能检查预计会遇到接受度问题,因为用户不习惯使用智能检查,而且必须为设备安装和数据通信支付额外费用。本研究旨在利用调查数据调查智能检测的接受程度。研究采用分层贝叶斯模型来探讨用户特征对智能检测接受度的影响。除每月检查费用外,受访者更喜欢智能检查的属性,而不喜欢现行的现场检查方法。他们更喜欢更频繁、更广泛的检查,更喜欢避免断电和身体接触。因此,政府应告知用户,智能检测既方便又准确。这对那些因隐私问题而希望避免实地考察的用户也有吸引力。如果政府利用现有的智能设备和通信基础设施降低检查成本,并利用智能手机和家庭显示屏提供实时电气安全信息,那么接受率就会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Structural imbalance and integrated economic development of RCEP countries on perspective of industrial network Social media data-based spatio-temporal assessment of public attitudes towards digital contact tracing applications: A case of health code application in mainland China Climate risks, financial performance and lending growth: Evidence from the banking industry Geopolitics and the changing landscape of global value chains and competition in the global semiconductor industry: Rivalry and catch-up in chip manufacturing in East Asia Digital inequalities among internet users before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison from two cross-sectional surveys in Slovenia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1